Cargando…

Evaluation of the Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment Suicide Risk Modeling Clinical Program in the Veterans Health Administration

IMPORTANCE: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a national clinical program using a suicide risk prediction algorithm, Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment (REACH VET), in which clinicians facilitate care enhancements for individuals identified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarthy, John F., Cooper, Samantha A., Dent, Kallisse R., Eagan, Aaron E., Matarazzo, Bridget B., Hannemann, Claire M., Reger, Mark A., Landes, Sara J., Trafton, Jodie A., Schoenbaum, Michael, Katz, Ira R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34661661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29900
_version_ 1784585487832317952
author McCarthy, John F.
Cooper, Samantha A.
Dent, Kallisse R.
Eagan, Aaron E.
Matarazzo, Bridget B.
Hannemann, Claire M.
Reger, Mark A.
Landes, Sara J.
Trafton, Jodie A.
Schoenbaum, Michael
Katz, Ira R.
author_facet McCarthy, John F.
Cooper, Samantha A.
Dent, Kallisse R.
Eagan, Aaron E.
Matarazzo, Bridget B.
Hannemann, Claire M.
Reger, Mark A.
Landes, Sara J.
Trafton, Jodie A.
Schoenbaum, Michael
Katz, Ira R.
author_sort McCarthy, John F.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a national clinical program using a suicide risk prediction algorithm, Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment (REACH VET), in which clinicians facilitate care enhancements for individuals identified in local top 0.1% suicide risk tiers. Evaluation studies are needed. OBJECTIVE: To determine associations with treatment engagement, health care utilization, suicide attempts, safety plan documentation, and 6-month mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used triple differences analyses comparing 6-month changes in outcomes after vs before program entry for individuals entering the REACH VET program (March 2017-December 2018) vs a similarly identified top 0.1% suicide risk tier cohort from prior to program initiation (March 2014-December 2015), adjusting for trends across subthreshold cohorts. Subcohort analyses (including individuals from March 2017-June 2018) evaluated difference-in-differences for cause-specific mortality using death certificate data. The subthreshold cohorts included individuals in the top 0.3% to 0.1% suicide risk tier, below the threshold for REACH VET eligibility, from the concurrent REACH VET period and from the pre–REACH VET period. Data were analyzed from December 2019 through September 2021. EXPOSURES: REACH VET–designated clinicians treatment reevaluation and outreach for care enhancements, including safety planning, increased monitoring, and interventions to enhance coping. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Process outcomes included VHA scheduled, completed, and missed appointments; mental health visits; and safety plan documentation and documentation within 6 months for individuals without plans within the prior 2 years. Clinical outcomes included mental health admissions, emergency department visits, nonfatal suicide attempts, and all-cause, suicide, and nonsuicide external-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 173 313 individuals (mean [SD] age, 51.0 [14.7] years; 161 264 [93.1%] men and 12 049 [7.0%] women) were included in analyses, including 40 816 individuals eligible for REACH VET care and 36 604 individuals from the pre–REACH VET period in the top 0.1% of suicide risk. The REACH VET intervention was associated with significant increases in completed outpatient appointments (adjusted triple difference [ATD], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.55) and proportion of individuals with new safety plans (ATD, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.10) and reductions in mental health admissions (ATD, −0.08; 95% CI, −0.10 to −0.05), emergency department visits (ADT, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.01), and suicide attempts (ADT, −0.05; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.03). Subcohort analyses did not identify differences in suicide or all-cause mortality (eg, age-and-sex-adjusted difference-in-difference for suicide mortality, 0.0007; 95% CI, −0.0006 to 0.0019). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that REACH VET implementation was associated with greater treatment engagement and new safety plan documentation and fewer mental health admissions, emergency department visits, and suicide attempts. Clinical programs using risk modeling may be effective tools to support care enhancements and risk reduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8524305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85243052021-11-04 Evaluation of the Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment Suicide Risk Modeling Clinical Program in the Veterans Health Administration McCarthy, John F. Cooper, Samantha A. Dent, Kallisse R. Eagan, Aaron E. Matarazzo, Bridget B. Hannemann, Claire M. Reger, Mark A. Landes, Sara J. Trafton, Jodie A. Schoenbaum, Michael Katz, Ira R. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a national clinical program using a suicide risk prediction algorithm, Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment (REACH VET), in which clinicians facilitate care enhancements for individuals identified in local top 0.1% suicide risk tiers. Evaluation studies are needed. OBJECTIVE: To determine associations with treatment engagement, health care utilization, suicide attempts, safety plan documentation, and 6-month mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used triple differences analyses comparing 6-month changes in outcomes after vs before program entry for individuals entering the REACH VET program (March 2017-December 2018) vs a similarly identified top 0.1% suicide risk tier cohort from prior to program initiation (March 2014-December 2015), adjusting for trends across subthreshold cohorts. Subcohort analyses (including individuals from March 2017-June 2018) evaluated difference-in-differences for cause-specific mortality using death certificate data. The subthreshold cohorts included individuals in the top 0.3% to 0.1% suicide risk tier, below the threshold for REACH VET eligibility, from the concurrent REACH VET period and from the pre–REACH VET period. Data were analyzed from December 2019 through September 2021. EXPOSURES: REACH VET–designated clinicians treatment reevaluation and outreach for care enhancements, including safety planning, increased monitoring, and interventions to enhance coping. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Process outcomes included VHA scheduled, completed, and missed appointments; mental health visits; and safety plan documentation and documentation within 6 months for individuals without plans within the prior 2 years. Clinical outcomes included mental health admissions, emergency department visits, nonfatal suicide attempts, and all-cause, suicide, and nonsuicide external-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 173 313 individuals (mean [SD] age, 51.0 [14.7] years; 161 264 [93.1%] men and 12 049 [7.0%] women) were included in analyses, including 40 816 individuals eligible for REACH VET care and 36 604 individuals from the pre–REACH VET period in the top 0.1% of suicide risk. The REACH VET intervention was associated with significant increases in completed outpatient appointments (adjusted triple difference [ATD], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.55) and proportion of individuals with new safety plans (ATD, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.10) and reductions in mental health admissions (ATD, −0.08; 95% CI, −0.10 to −0.05), emergency department visits (ADT, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.01), and suicide attempts (ADT, −0.05; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.03). Subcohort analyses did not identify differences in suicide or all-cause mortality (eg, age-and-sex-adjusted difference-in-difference for suicide mortality, 0.0007; 95% CI, −0.0006 to 0.0019). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that REACH VET implementation was associated with greater treatment engagement and new safety plan documentation and fewer mental health admissions, emergency department visits, and suicide attempts. Clinical programs using risk modeling may be effective tools to support care enhancements and risk reduction. American Medical Association 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8524305/ /pubmed/34661661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29900 Text en Copyright 2021 McCarthy JF et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
McCarthy, John F.
Cooper, Samantha A.
Dent, Kallisse R.
Eagan, Aaron E.
Matarazzo, Bridget B.
Hannemann, Claire M.
Reger, Mark A.
Landes, Sara J.
Trafton, Jodie A.
Schoenbaum, Michael
Katz, Ira R.
Evaluation of the Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment Suicide Risk Modeling Clinical Program in the Veterans Health Administration
title Evaluation of the Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment Suicide Risk Modeling Clinical Program in the Veterans Health Administration
title_full Evaluation of the Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment Suicide Risk Modeling Clinical Program in the Veterans Health Administration
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment Suicide Risk Modeling Clinical Program in the Veterans Health Administration
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment Suicide Risk Modeling Clinical Program in the Veterans Health Administration
title_short Evaluation of the Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment Suicide Risk Modeling Clinical Program in the Veterans Health Administration
title_sort evaluation of the recovery engagement and coordination for health–veterans enhanced treatment suicide risk modeling clinical program in the veterans health administration
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34661661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29900
work_keys_str_mv AT mccarthyjohnf evaluationoftherecoveryengagementandcoordinationforhealthveteransenhancedtreatmentsuicideriskmodelingclinicalprogramintheveteranshealthadministration
AT coopersamanthaa evaluationoftherecoveryengagementandcoordinationforhealthveteransenhancedtreatmentsuicideriskmodelingclinicalprogramintheveteranshealthadministration
AT dentkallisser evaluationoftherecoveryengagementandcoordinationforhealthveteransenhancedtreatmentsuicideriskmodelingclinicalprogramintheveteranshealthadministration
AT eaganaarone evaluationoftherecoveryengagementandcoordinationforhealthveteransenhancedtreatmentsuicideriskmodelingclinicalprogramintheveteranshealthadministration
AT matarazzobridgetb evaluationoftherecoveryengagementandcoordinationforhealthveteransenhancedtreatmentsuicideriskmodelingclinicalprogramintheveteranshealthadministration
AT hannemannclairem evaluationoftherecoveryengagementandcoordinationforhealthveteransenhancedtreatmentsuicideriskmodelingclinicalprogramintheveteranshealthadministration
AT regermarka evaluationoftherecoveryengagementandcoordinationforhealthveteransenhancedtreatmentsuicideriskmodelingclinicalprogramintheveteranshealthadministration
AT landessaraj evaluationoftherecoveryengagementandcoordinationforhealthveteransenhancedtreatmentsuicideriskmodelingclinicalprogramintheveteranshealthadministration
AT traftonjodiea evaluationoftherecoveryengagementandcoordinationforhealthveteransenhancedtreatmentsuicideriskmodelingclinicalprogramintheveteranshealthadministration
AT schoenbaummichael evaluationoftherecoveryengagementandcoordinationforhealthveteransenhancedtreatmentsuicideriskmodelingclinicalprogramintheveteranshealthadministration
AT katzirar evaluationoftherecoveryengagementandcoordinationforhealthveteransenhancedtreatmentsuicideriskmodelingclinicalprogramintheveteranshealthadministration