Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Recovery Phase of Cardiovascular Diseases: Protocol for a Multicenter, Nonrandomized, Single-Arm, Interventional Trial

BACKGROUND: Conventional group-based outpatient cardiac rehabilitation through monitoring and center-based approaches for patients in the recovery phase has shown strong evidence for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. However, there are some cases in which maintaining attendance of center-ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Itoh, Hidetaka, Amiya, Eisuke, Narita, Koichi, Shimbo, Mai, Taya, Masanobu, Komuro, Issei, Hasegawa, Takashi, Makita, Shigeru, Kimura, Yutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407925
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30725
_version_ 1784585492474363904
author Itoh, Hidetaka
Amiya, Eisuke
Narita, Koichi
Shimbo, Mai
Taya, Masanobu
Komuro, Issei
Hasegawa, Takashi
Makita, Shigeru
Kimura, Yutaka
author_facet Itoh, Hidetaka
Amiya, Eisuke
Narita, Koichi
Shimbo, Mai
Taya, Masanobu
Komuro, Issei
Hasegawa, Takashi
Makita, Shigeru
Kimura, Yutaka
author_sort Itoh, Hidetaka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conventional group-based outpatient cardiac rehabilitation through monitoring and center-based approaches for patients in the recovery phase has shown strong evidence for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. However, there are some cases in which maintaining attendance of center-based cardiac rehabilitation is difficult. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to ascertain the safety and efficacy of remote cardiac rehabilitation (RCR) in the recovery phase in patients with cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Patients satisfying the study criteria will be recruited from multiple institutions (approximately 30) across Japan. In total, 75 patients (approximately 2 or 3 patients from each institution) are proposed to be recruited. Patients enrolled in the RCR group will be lent devices necessary for RCR (including calibrated ergometers and tablets). Patients will perform anaerobic exercise at home using ergometer for 30-40 minutes at least 3 times weekly. During exercise, an instructor will monitor the patient in real time (using interactive video tools and monitoring tools for various vital data). Moreover, educational instructions will be given 3 times weekly using e-learning methods. RESULTS: The primary endpoint is the peak oxygen uptake 2-3 months from the start of exercise or 6-min walk test. The extracted data will be compared between RCR patients and controls without RCR. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of the system of RCR proposed in this study will lead to the development of more extensive applications, which have been insufficient through conventional interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network—Clinical Trials Registry UMIN–CTR UMIN000042942; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000048983 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/30725
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8524329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85243292021-11-09 Efficacy and Safety of Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Recovery Phase of Cardiovascular Diseases: Protocol for a Multicenter, Nonrandomized, Single-Arm, Interventional Trial Itoh, Hidetaka Amiya, Eisuke Narita, Koichi Shimbo, Mai Taya, Masanobu Komuro, Issei Hasegawa, Takashi Makita, Shigeru Kimura, Yutaka JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Conventional group-based outpatient cardiac rehabilitation through monitoring and center-based approaches for patients in the recovery phase has shown strong evidence for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. However, there are some cases in which maintaining attendance of center-based cardiac rehabilitation is difficult. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to ascertain the safety and efficacy of remote cardiac rehabilitation (RCR) in the recovery phase in patients with cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Patients satisfying the study criteria will be recruited from multiple institutions (approximately 30) across Japan. In total, 75 patients (approximately 2 or 3 patients from each institution) are proposed to be recruited. Patients enrolled in the RCR group will be lent devices necessary for RCR (including calibrated ergometers and tablets). Patients will perform anaerobic exercise at home using ergometer for 30-40 minutes at least 3 times weekly. During exercise, an instructor will monitor the patient in real time (using interactive video tools and monitoring tools for various vital data). Moreover, educational instructions will be given 3 times weekly using e-learning methods. RESULTS: The primary endpoint is the peak oxygen uptake 2-3 months from the start of exercise or 6-min walk test. The extracted data will be compared between RCR patients and controls without RCR. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of the system of RCR proposed in this study will lead to the development of more extensive applications, which have been insufficient through conventional interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network—Clinical Trials Registry UMIN–CTR UMIN000042942; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000048983 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/30725 JMIR Publications 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8524329/ /pubmed/34407925 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30725 Text en ©Hidetaka Itoh, Eisuke Amiya, Koichi Narita, Mai Shimbo, Masanobu Taya, Issei Komuro, Takashi Hasegawa, Shigeru Makita, Yutaka Kimura. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 04.10.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Itoh, Hidetaka
Amiya, Eisuke
Narita, Koichi
Shimbo, Mai
Taya, Masanobu
Komuro, Issei
Hasegawa, Takashi
Makita, Shigeru
Kimura, Yutaka
Efficacy and Safety of Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Recovery Phase of Cardiovascular Diseases: Protocol for a Multicenter, Nonrandomized, Single-Arm, Interventional Trial
title Efficacy and Safety of Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Recovery Phase of Cardiovascular Diseases: Protocol for a Multicenter, Nonrandomized, Single-Arm, Interventional Trial
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Recovery Phase of Cardiovascular Diseases: Protocol for a Multicenter, Nonrandomized, Single-Arm, Interventional Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Recovery Phase of Cardiovascular Diseases: Protocol for a Multicenter, Nonrandomized, Single-Arm, Interventional Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Recovery Phase of Cardiovascular Diseases: Protocol for a Multicenter, Nonrandomized, Single-Arm, Interventional Trial
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Recovery Phase of Cardiovascular Diseases: Protocol for a Multicenter, Nonrandomized, Single-Arm, Interventional Trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of remote cardiac rehabilitation in the recovery phase of cardiovascular diseases: protocol for a multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm, interventional trial
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407925
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30725
work_keys_str_mv AT itohhidetaka efficacyandsafetyofremotecardiacrehabilitationintherecoveryphaseofcardiovasculardiseasesprotocolforamulticenternonrandomizedsinglearminterventionaltrial
AT amiyaeisuke efficacyandsafetyofremotecardiacrehabilitationintherecoveryphaseofcardiovasculardiseasesprotocolforamulticenternonrandomizedsinglearminterventionaltrial
AT naritakoichi efficacyandsafetyofremotecardiacrehabilitationintherecoveryphaseofcardiovasculardiseasesprotocolforamulticenternonrandomizedsinglearminterventionaltrial
AT shimbomai efficacyandsafetyofremotecardiacrehabilitationintherecoveryphaseofcardiovasculardiseasesprotocolforamulticenternonrandomizedsinglearminterventionaltrial
AT tayamasanobu efficacyandsafetyofremotecardiacrehabilitationintherecoveryphaseofcardiovasculardiseasesprotocolforamulticenternonrandomizedsinglearminterventionaltrial
AT komuroissei efficacyandsafetyofremotecardiacrehabilitationintherecoveryphaseofcardiovasculardiseasesprotocolforamulticenternonrandomizedsinglearminterventionaltrial
AT hasegawatakashi efficacyandsafetyofremotecardiacrehabilitationintherecoveryphaseofcardiovasculardiseasesprotocolforamulticenternonrandomizedsinglearminterventionaltrial
AT makitashigeru efficacyandsafetyofremotecardiacrehabilitationintherecoveryphaseofcardiovasculardiseasesprotocolforamulticenternonrandomizedsinglearminterventionaltrial
AT kimurayutaka efficacyandsafetyofremotecardiacrehabilitationintherecoveryphaseofcardiovasculardiseasesprotocolforamulticenternonrandomizedsinglearminterventionaltrial