Cargando…

Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study

BACKGROUND: In SELECT-PsA 1, a randomised double-blind phase 3 study, upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg were superior to placebo and non-inferior to adalimumab in ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at 12 weeks in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here, we report 56...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McInnes, Iain B, Kato, Koji, Magrey, Marina, Merola, Joseph F, Kishimoto, Mitsumasa, Pacheco-Tena, César, Haaland, Derek, Chen, Liang, Duan, Yuanyuan, Zueger, Patrick, Liu, John, Lippe, Ralph, Pangan, Aileen L, Behrens, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001838
_version_ 1784585501729095680
author McInnes, Iain B
Kato, Koji
Magrey, Marina
Merola, Joseph F
Kishimoto, Mitsumasa
Pacheco-Tena, César
Haaland, Derek
Chen, Liang
Duan, Yuanyuan
Zueger, Patrick
Liu, John
Lippe, Ralph
Pangan, Aileen L
Behrens, Frank
author_facet McInnes, Iain B
Kato, Koji
Magrey, Marina
Merola, Joseph F
Kishimoto, Mitsumasa
Pacheco-Tena, César
Haaland, Derek
Chen, Liang
Duan, Yuanyuan
Zueger, Patrick
Liu, John
Lippe, Ralph
Pangan, Aileen L
Behrens, Frank
author_sort McInnes, Iain B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In SELECT-PsA 1, a randomised double-blind phase 3 study, upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg were superior to placebo and non-inferior to adalimumab in ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at 12 weeks in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here, we report 56-week efficacy and safety in patients from SELECT-PsA 1. METHODS: Patients received upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg once daily, adalimumab 40 mg every other week for 56 weeks or placebo through week 24 switched thereafter to upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg until week 56. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving ≥20%/50%/70% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20/50/70), ≥75%/90%/100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75/90/100), minimal disease activity (MDA) and change from baseline in modified total Sharp/van der Heijde Score. Treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient years (PY) were summarised. RESULTS: Consistent with results through week 24, ACR20/50/70, PASI75/90/100 and MDA responses were maintained with upadacitinib through week 56 and were generally numerically higher than with adalimumab; inhibition of radiographic progression was also maintained. Patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib exhibited comparable improvements at week 56 as patients originally randomised to upadacitinib. The rates of serious adverse events were 9.1 events/100 PY with upadacitinib 15 mg and 12.3 events/100 PY with upadacitinib 30 mg. Two deaths were reported in each of the upadacitinib groups. CONCLUSION: Efficacy across various domains of PsA were maintained with upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg through week 56 with no new safety signals observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8524381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85243812021-11-15 Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study McInnes, Iain B Kato, Koji Magrey, Marina Merola, Joseph F Kishimoto, Mitsumasa Pacheco-Tena, César Haaland, Derek Chen, Liang Duan, Yuanyuan Zueger, Patrick Liu, John Lippe, Ralph Pangan, Aileen L Behrens, Frank RMD Open Psoriatic Arthritis BACKGROUND: In SELECT-PsA 1, a randomised double-blind phase 3 study, upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg were superior to placebo and non-inferior to adalimumab in ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at 12 weeks in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here, we report 56-week efficacy and safety in patients from SELECT-PsA 1. METHODS: Patients received upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg once daily, adalimumab 40 mg every other week for 56 weeks or placebo through week 24 switched thereafter to upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg until week 56. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving ≥20%/50%/70% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20/50/70), ≥75%/90%/100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75/90/100), minimal disease activity (MDA) and change from baseline in modified total Sharp/van der Heijde Score. Treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient years (PY) were summarised. RESULTS: Consistent with results through week 24, ACR20/50/70, PASI75/90/100 and MDA responses were maintained with upadacitinib through week 56 and were generally numerically higher than with adalimumab; inhibition of radiographic progression was also maintained. Patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib exhibited comparable improvements at week 56 as patients originally randomised to upadacitinib. The rates of serious adverse events were 9.1 events/100 PY with upadacitinib 15 mg and 12.3 events/100 PY with upadacitinib 30 mg. Two deaths were reported in each of the upadacitinib groups. CONCLUSION: Efficacy across various domains of PsA were maintained with upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg through week 56 with no new safety signals observed. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8524381/ /pubmed/34663636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001838 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Psoriatic Arthritis
McInnes, Iain B
Kato, Koji
Magrey, Marina
Merola, Joseph F
Kishimoto, Mitsumasa
Pacheco-Tena, César
Haaland, Derek
Chen, Liang
Duan, Yuanyuan
Zueger, Patrick
Liu, John
Lippe, Ralph
Pangan, Aileen L
Behrens, Frank
Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study
title Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study
title_full Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study
title_fullStr Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study
title_full_unstemmed Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study
title_short Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study
title_sort upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 select-psa 1 study
topic Psoriatic Arthritis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001838
work_keys_str_mv AT mcinnesiainb upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT katokoji upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT magreymarina upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT merolajosephf upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT kishimotomitsumasa upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT pachecotenacesar upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT haalandderek upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT chenliang upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT duanyuanyuan upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT zuegerpatrick upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT liujohn upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT lipperalph upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT panganaileenl upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study
AT behrensfrank upadacitinibinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritisandaninadequateresponsetononbiologicaltherapy56weekdatafromthephase3selectpsa1study