Cargando…

Adjunctive cytoprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review

With the introduction of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), a new era for treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has arrived. However, despite the much larger recanalization rate as compared to thrombolysis alone, final outcome remains far from ideal. This raises the question if some of the previous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulder, I. A., van Bavel, E. T., de Vries, H. E., Coutinho, J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-021-00280-1
_version_ 1784585563927478272
author Mulder, I. A.
van Bavel, E. T.
de Vries, H. E.
Coutinho, J. M.
author_facet Mulder, I. A.
van Bavel, E. T.
de Vries, H. E.
Coutinho, J. M.
author_sort Mulder, I. A.
collection PubMed
description With the introduction of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), a new era for treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has arrived. However, despite the much larger recanalization rate as compared to thrombolysis alone, final outcome remains far from ideal. This raises the question if some of the previously tested neuroprotective drugs warrant re-evaluation, since these compounds were all tested in studies where large-vessel recanalization was rarely achieved in the acute phase. This review provides an overview of compounds tested in clinical AIS trials and gives insight into which of these drugs warrant a re-evaluation as an add-on therapy for AIS in the era of EVT. A literature search was performed using the search terms “ischemic stroke brain” in title/abstract, and additional filters. After exclusion of papers using pre-defined selection criteria, a total of 89 trials were eligible for review which reported on 56 unique compounds. Trial compounds were divided into 6 categories based on their perceived mode of action: systemic haemodynamics, excitotoxicity, neuro-inflammation, blood–brain barrier and vasogenic edema, oxidative and nitrosative stress, neurogenesis/-regeneration and -recovery. Main trial outcomes and safety issues are summarized and promising compounds for re-evaluation are highlighted. Looking at group effect, drugs intervening with oxidative and nitrosative stress and neurogenesis/-regeneration and -recovery appear to have a favourable safety profile and show the most promising results regarding efficacy. Finally, possible theories behind individual and group effects are discussed and recommendation for promising treatment strategies are described.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8524879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85248792021-10-22 Adjunctive cytoprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review Mulder, I. A. van Bavel, E. T. de Vries, H. E. Coutinho, J. M. Fluids Barriers CNS Review With the introduction of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), a new era for treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has arrived. However, despite the much larger recanalization rate as compared to thrombolysis alone, final outcome remains far from ideal. This raises the question if some of the previously tested neuroprotective drugs warrant re-evaluation, since these compounds were all tested in studies where large-vessel recanalization was rarely achieved in the acute phase. This review provides an overview of compounds tested in clinical AIS trials and gives insight into which of these drugs warrant a re-evaluation as an add-on therapy for AIS in the era of EVT. A literature search was performed using the search terms “ischemic stroke brain” in title/abstract, and additional filters. After exclusion of papers using pre-defined selection criteria, a total of 89 trials were eligible for review which reported on 56 unique compounds. Trial compounds were divided into 6 categories based on their perceived mode of action: systemic haemodynamics, excitotoxicity, neuro-inflammation, blood–brain barrier and vasogenic edema, oxidative and nitrosative stress, neurogenesis/-regeneration and -recovery. Main trial outcomes and safety issues are summarized and promising compounds for re-evaluation are highlighted. Looking at group effect, drugs intervening with oxidative and nitrosative stress and neurogenesis/-regeneration and -recovery appear to have a favourable safety profile and show the most promising results regarding efficacy. Finally, possible theories behind individual and group effects are discussed and recommendation for promising treatment strategies are described. BioMed Central 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8524879/ /pubmed/34666786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-021-00280-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Mulder, I. A.
van Bavel, E. T.
de Vries, H. E.
Coutinho, J. M.
Adjunctive cytoprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review
title Adjunctive cytoprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review
title_full Adjunctive cytoprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review
title_fullStr Adjunctive cytoprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Adjunctive cytoprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review
title_short Adjunctive cytoprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review
title_sort adjunctive cytoprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-021-00280-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mulderia adjunctivecytoprotectivetherapiesinacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreview
AT vanbavelet adjunctivecytoprotectivetherapiesinacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreview
AT devrieshe adjunctivecytoprotectivetherapiesinacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreview
AT coutinhojm adjunctivecytoprotectivetherapiesinacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreview