Cargando…

Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Dry needling (DN) is increasingly used for treating myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and has shown significant effects on pain and function. This study aimed to assess feasibility of conducting a randomized sham-controlled trial and to collect preliminary data on the effects of infraspi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laramée, Antoine, Léonard, Guillaume, Morin, Mélanie, Roch, Mélanie, Gaudreault, Nathaly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-021-00118-x
_version_ 1784585566085447680
author Laramée, Antoine
Léonard, Guillaume
Morin, Mélanie
Roch, Mélanie
Gaudreault, Nathaly
author_facet Laramée, Antoine
Léonard, Guillaume
Morin, Mélanie
Roch, Mélanie
Gaudreault, Nathaly
author_sort Laramée, Antoine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dry needling (DN) is increasingly used for treating myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and has shown significant effects on pain and function. This study aimed to assess feasibility of conducting a randomized sham-controlled trial and to collect preliminary data on the effects of infraspinatus DN on corticospinal excitability and mechanical pain sensitivity. METHOD: This randomized feasibility study included adults with chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain and a infraspinatus MTrP. Participants were randomized to receive real DN or sham DN in the infraspinatus MTrP. Feasibility outcomes included data pertaining to recruitment, retention of participants, completeness and safety of assessment procedures. Neurophysiological and psychophysical outcomes included corticospinal excitability and mechanical pain sensitivity measured by active motor threshold (aMT) and pressure pain threshold (PPT), respectively. They were assessed at baseline, immediately after and 24 h post-intervention. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants were recruited over a 6-month period. Nineteen participants completed the treatment and follow-up assessment. Motor evoked potential responses were discernible in all but 1 participant. Only 1 minor adverse event related to transcranial magnetic stimulation (mild headache) affected the measurements. No DN adverse effects were recorded in both groups. An overall completeness rate of 81% was reached, with 70% completeness in the DN group and 91% in the sham group. Data analysis revealed that real DN increased corticospinal excitability (reduced aMT) 24 h post-intervention (Mdn = − 5.96% MSO, IQR = 5.17, p = 0.04) and that sham DN triggered similar responses immediately after the intervention (Mdn = − 1.93% MSO, IQR = 1.11, p = 0.03). Increased mechanical pain sensitivity (reduced PPT) was significant only in the sham group, both immediately (Mdn = − 0.44 kg/cm(2), IQR = 0.49, p = 0.01) and 24 h post-intervention (Mdn = − 0.52 kg/cm(2), IQR = 1.02, p = 0.02). Changes in corticospinal excitability was positively correlated with changes in mechanical pain sensitivity in the DN group, both immediately (r = 0.77, p = 0.02) and 24 h post-intervention (r = 0.75, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates the feasibility of quantifying the neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of DN, and provides recommendations and guidelines for future studies. Moreover, it provides preliminary evidence that DN may increase corticospinal excitability of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain and that the relationship of neurophysiological and psychophysical effects is promising to better understand its mechanisms of action. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04316793; retrospectively registered November 3, 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8524890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85248902021-10-22 Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study Laramée, Antoine Léonard, Guillaume Morin, Mélanie Roch, Mélanie Gaudreault, Nathaly Arch Physiother Research Article BACKGROUND: Dry needling (DN) is increasingly used for treating myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and has shown significant effects on pain and function. This study aimed to assess feasibility of conducting a randomized sham-controlled trial and to collect preliminary data on the effects of infraspinatus DN on corticospinal excitability and mechanical pain sensitivity. METHOD: This randomized feasibility study included adults with chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain and a infraspinatus MTrP. Participants were randomized to receive real DN or sham DN in the infraspinatus MTrP. Feasibility outcomes included data pertaining to recruitment, retention of participants, completeness and safety of assessment procedures. Neurophysiological and psychophysical outcomes included corticospinal excitability and mechanical pain sensitivity measured by active motor threshold (aMT) and pressure pain threshold (PPT), respectively. They were assessed at baseline, immediately after and 24 h post-intervention. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants were recruited over a 6-month period. Nineteen participants completed the treatment and follow-up assessment. Motor evoked potential responses were discernible in all but 1 participant. Only 1 minor adverse event related to transcranial magnetic stimulation (mild headache) affected the measurements. No DN adverse effects were recorded in both groups. An overall completeness rate of 81% was reached, with 70% completeness in the DN group and 91% in the sham group. Data analysis revealed that real DN increased corticospinal excitability (reduced aMT) 24 h post-intervention (Mdn = − 5.96% MSO, IQR = 5.17, p = 0.04) and that sham DN triggered similar responses immediately after the intervention (Mdn = − 1.93% MSO, IQR = 1.11, p = 0.03). Increased mechanical pain sensitivity (reduced PPT) was significant only in the sham group, both immediately (Mdn = − 0.44 kg/cm(2), IQR = 0.49, p = 0.01) and 24 h post-intervention (Mdn = − 0.52 kg/cm(2), IQR = 1.02, p = 0.02). Changes in corticospinal excitability was positively correlated with changes in mechanical pain sensitivity in the DN group, both immediately (r = 0.77, p = 0.02) and 24 h post-intervention (r = 0.75, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates the feasibility of quantifying the neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of DN, and provides recommendations and guidelines for future studies. Moreover, it provides preliminary evidence that DN may increase corticospinal excitability of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain and that the relationship of neurophysiological and psychophysical effects is promising to better understand its mechanisms of action. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04316793; retrospectively registered November 3, 2020. BioMed Central 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8524890/ /pubmed/34663474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-021-00118-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Laramée, Antoine
Léonard, Guillaume
Morin, Mélanie
Roch, Mélanie
Gaudreault, Nathaly
Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study
title Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study
title_full Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study
title_fullStr Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study
title_short Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study
title_sort neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-021-00118-x
work_keys_str_mv AT larameeantoine neurophysiologicalandpsychophysicaleffectsofdryversusshamneedlingoftheinfraspinatusmuscleinpatientswithchronicshoulderpainarandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT leonardguillaume neurophysiologicalandpsychophysicaleffectsofdryversusshamneedlingoftheinfraspinatusmuscleinpatientswithchronicshoulderpainarandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT morinmelanie neurophysiologicalandpsychophysicaleffectsofdryversusshamneedlingoftheinfraspinatusmuscleinpatientswithchronicshoulderpainarandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT rochmelanie neurophysiologicalandpsychophysicaleffectsofdryversusshamneedlingoftheinfraspinatusmuscleinpatientswithchronicshoulderpainarandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT gaudreaultnathaly neurophysiologicalandpsychophysicaleffectsofdryversusshamneedlingoftheinfraspinatusmuscleinpatientswithchronicshoulderpainarandomizedfeasibilitystudy