Cargando…

Comparison of different detection methods for Ascaris suum infection on Austrian swine farms

BACKGROUND: Ascaris suum, the large roundworm of pigs, is one of the economically most important pig parasites worldwide. In Austria it is commonly diagnosed by monitoring livers for milk spots at the slaughterhouse and intravital diagnosis (flotation for detection of fecal egg shedding). Recently,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joachim, Anja, Winkler, Christian, Ruczizka, Ursula, Ladinig, Andrea, Koch, Michaela, Tichy, Alexander, Schwarz, Lukas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00236-9
_version_ 1784585568284311552
author Joachim, Anja
Winkler, Christian
Ruczizka, Ursula
Ladinig, Andrea
Koch, Michaela
Tichy, Alexander
Schwarz, Lukas
author_facet Joachim, Anja
Winkler, Christian
Ruczizka, Ursula
Ladinig, Andrea
Koch, Michaela
Tichy, Alexander
Schwarz, Lukas
author_sort Joachim, Anja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ascaris suum, the large roundworm of pigs, is one of the economically most important pig parasites worldwide. In Austria it is commonly diagnosed by monitoring livers for milk spots at the slaughterhouse and intravital diagnosis (flotation for detection of fecal egg shedding). Recently, serological diagnosis based on the detection of specific antibodies with an ELISA (SERASCA®) with high sensitivity has been developed. To introduce and evaluate serology for A. suum screening in Austrian pigs, blood (for serology) (n = 177) and feces (for copromicroscopy) (n = 177) were taken from randomly selected slaughter pig batches from 18 farms at a slaughterhouse in Lower Austria. In addition, livers presented at slaughter (n = 844; max. 70/farm) were evaluated for milk spots. RESULTS: Overall, 19% of the livers were milk spot-positive (22% of those with complete diagnostic evaluations). Thirteen percent of the fecal samples contained A. suum eggs, while 69% of the blood samples were serologically positive. Despite we did not determine the sensitivity of the ELISA specifically, results ouf our study confirmed the high sensitivity of the ELISA, which was claimed by the manufacturer prior to our work (sensitivity: liver assessment: 23.5–27.0%; copromicroscopy: 8.5–9.0%; ELISA: 99.5%), and a high percentage of A. suum infections that remained undetected by standard liver assessment. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that the current method of roundworm diagnostics is insufficient and antibody detection at the end of the fattening period should be established as the standard procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8524899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85248992021-10-22 Comparison of different detection methods for Ascaris suum infection on Austrian swine farms Joachim, Anja Winkler, Christian Ruczizka, Ursula Ladinig, Andrea Koch, Michaela Tichy, Alexander Schwarz, Lukas Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Ascaris suum, the large roundworm of pigs, is one of the economically most important pig parasites worldwide. In Austria it is commonly diagnosed by monitoring livers for milk spots at the slaughterhouse and intravital diagnosis (flotation for detection of fecal egg shedding). Recently, serological diagnosis based on the detection of specific antibodies with an ELISA (SERASCA®) with high sensitivity has been developed. To introduce and evaluate serology for A. suum screening in Austrian pigs, blood (for serology) (n = 177) and feces (for copromicroscopy) (n = 177) were taken from randomly selected slaughter pig batches from 18 farms at a slaughterhouse in Lower Austria. In addition, livers presented at slaughter (n = 844; max. 70/farm) were evaluated for milk spots. RESULTS: Overall, 19% of the livers were milk spot-positive (22% of those with complete diagnostic evaluations). Thirteen percent of the fecal samples contained A. suum eggs, while 69% of the blood samples were serologically positive. Despite we did not determine the sensitivity of the ELISA specifically, results ouf our study confirmed the high sensitivity of the ELISA, which was claimed by the manufacturer prior to our work (sensitivity: liver assessment: 23.5–27.0%; copromicroscopy: 8.5–9.0%; ELISA: 99.5%), and a high percentage of A. suum infections that remained undetected by standard liver assessment. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that the current method of roundworm diagnostics is insufficient and antibody detection at the end of the fattening period should be established as the standard procedure. BioMed Central 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8524899/ /pubmed/34666834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00236-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Joachim, Anja
Winkler, Christian
Ruczizka, Ursula
Ladinig, Andrea
Koch, Michaela
Tichy, Alexander
Schwarz, Lukas
Comparison of different detection methods for Ascaris suum infection on Austrian swine farms
title Comparison of different detection methods for Ascaris suum infection on Austrian swine farms
title_full Comparison of different detection methods for Ascaris suum infection on Austrian swine farms
title_fullStr Comparison of different detection methods for Ascaris suum infection on Austrian swine farms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different detection methods for Ascaris suum infection on Austrian swine farms
title_short Comparison of different detection methods for Ascaris suum infection on Austrian swine farms
title_sort comparison of different detection methods for ascaris suum infection on austrian swine farms
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00236-9
work_keys_str_mv AT joachimanja comparisonofdifferentdetectionmethodsforascarissuuminfectiononaustrianswinefarms
AT winklerchristian comparisonofdifferentdetectionmethodsforascarissuuminfectiononaustrianswinefarms
AT ruczizkaursula comparisonofdifferentdetectionmethodsforascarissuuminfectiononaustrianswinefarms
AT ladinigandrea comparisonofdifferentdetectionmethodsforascarissuuminfectiononaustrianswinefarms
AT kochmichaela comparisonofdifferentdetectionmethodsforascarissuuminfectiononaustrianswinefarms
AT tichyalexander comparisonofdifferentdetectionmethodsforascarissuuminfectiononaustrianswinefarms
AT schwarzlukas comparisonofdifferentdetectionmethodsforascarissuuminfectiononaustrianswinefarms