Cargando…

The effect of ultraviolet irradiation compared to oral vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure of nursing home residents with dementia

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have reported an inverse association between ultraviolet (UV) radiation and hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess differences in blood pressure changes between persons with dementia receiving UV light versus vitamin D (VD) supplementation. METHODS: Post-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veleva, Bistra I., Caljouw, Monique A. A., Muurman, Astrid, van der Steen, Jenny T., Chel, Victor G. M., Numans, Mattijs E., Poortvliet, Rosalinde K. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02538-7
_version_ 1784585577126952960
author Veleva, Bistra I.
Caljouw, Monique A. A.
Muurman, Astrid
van der Steen, Jenny T.
Chel, Victor G. M.
Numans, Mattijs E.
Poortvliet, Rosalinde K. E.
author_facet Veleva, Bistra I.
Caljouw, Monique A. A.
Muurman, Astrid
van der Steen, Jenny T.
Chel, Victor G. M.
Numans, Mattijs E.
Poortvliet, Rosalinde K. E.
author_sort Veleva, Bistra I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Observational studies have reported an inverse association between ultraviolet (UV) radiation and hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess differences in blood pressure changes between persons with dementia receiving UV light versus vitamin D (VD) supplementation. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of randomized controlled trial data concerning nursing home residents with dementia (N = 61; 41 women, mean age 84.8 years). The participants received half-body UV irradiation, twice weekly over 6 months, at one standard erythema dose (UV group, n = 22) or 5600 international units of cholecalciferol once a week (VD group, n = 39). Short-term effects were evaluated after 1 month and long-term effects after 3 and 6 months. Differences in blood pressure changes were assessed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: With the VD group as a reference, the estimated difference in mean change of systolic blood pressure was − 26.0 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -39.9, − 12.1, p = .000] at 1 month, 4.5 mmHg (95% CI -6.8, 15.9, p = 0.432) at 3 months, and 0.1 (95% CI -14.1, 14.3, p = 0.83) at 6 months. The estimated difference in diastolic blood pressure was − 10.0 mmHg (95% CI -19.2, − 0.7, p = 0.035) at 1 month, 3.6 mmHg (95% CI -4.1, 11.2, p = 0.358) at 3 months, and 2.7 (95% CI -6.8, 12.1, p = 0.580) at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: UV light had only a short-term effect but not a long-term effect on blood pressure reduction compared to VD use in this sample of normotensive to mild hypertensive nursing home residents with dementia. Future studies will be needed to determine the effect of UV light in different samples of the population and especially in a population with hypertension. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02538-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8524945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85249452021-10-22 The effect of ultraviolet irradiation compared to oral vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure of nursing home residents with dementia Veleva, Bistra I. Caljouw, Monique A. A. Muurman, Astrid van der Steen, Jenny T. Chel, Victor G. M. Numans, Mattijs E. Poortvliet, Rosalinde K. E. BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Observational studies have reported an inverse association between ultraviolet (UV) radiation and hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess differences in blood pressure changes between persons with dementia receiving UV light versus vitamin D (VD) supplementation. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of randomized controlled trial data concerning nursing home residents with dementia (N = 61; 41 women, mean age 84.8 years). The participants received half-body UV irradiation, twice weekly over 6 months, at one standard erythema dose (UV group, n = 22) or 5600 international units of cholecalciferol once a week (VD group, n = 39). Short-term effects were evaluated after 1 month and long-term effects after 3 and 6 months. Differences in blood pressure changes were assessed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: With the VD group as a reference, the estimated difference in mean change of systolic blood pressure was − 26.0 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -39.9, − 12.1, p = .000] at 1 month, 4.5 mmHg (95% CI -6.8, 15.9, p = 0.432) at 3 months, and 0.1 (95% CI -14.1, 14.3, p = 0.83) at 6 months. The estimated difference in diastolic blood pressure was − 10.0 mmHg (95% CI -19.2, − 0.7, p = 0.035) at 1 month, 3.6 mmHg (95% CI -4.1, 11.2, p = 0.358) at 3 months, and 2.7 (95% CI -6.8, 12.1, p = 0.580) at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: UV light had only a short-term effect but not a long-term effect on blood pressure reduction compared to VD use in this sample of normotensive to mild hypertensive nursing home residents with dementia. Future studies will be needed to determine the effect of UV light in different samples of the population and especially in a population with hypertension. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02538-7. BioMed Central 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8524945/ /pubmed/34666693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02538-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Veleva, Bistra I.
Caljouw, Monique A. A.
Muurman, Astrid
van der Steen, Jenny T.
Chel, Victor G. M.
Numans, Mattijs E.
Poortvliet, Rosalinde K. E.
The effect of ultraviolet irradiation compared to oral vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure of nursing home residents with dementia
title The effect of ultraviolet irradiation compared to oral vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure of nursing home residents with dementia
title_full The effect of ultraviolet irradiation compared to oral vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure of nursing home residents with dementia
title_fullStr The effect of ultraviolet irradiation compared to oral vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure of nursing home residents with dementia
title_full_unstemmed The effect of ultraviolet irradiation compared to oral vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure of nursing home residents with dementia
title_short The effect of ultraviolet irradiation compared to oral vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure of nursing home residents with dementia
title_sort effect of ultraviolet irradiation compared to oral vitamin d supplementation on blood pressure of nursing home residents with dementia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02538-7
work_keys_str_mv AT velevabistrai theeffectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT caljouwmoniqueaa theeffectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT muurmanastrid theeffectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT vandersteenjennyt theeffectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT chelvictorgm theeffectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT numansmattijse theeffectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT poortvlietrosalindeke theeffectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT velevabistrai effectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT caljouwmoniqueaa effectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT muurmanastrid effectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT vandersteenjennyt effectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT chelvictorgm effectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT numansmattijse effectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia
AT poortvlietrosalindeke effectofultravioletirradiationcomparedtooralvitamindsupplementationonbloodpressureofnursinghomeresidentswithdementia