Cargando…
Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy
BACKGROUND: Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy shows the ability to deliver high doses to tumors while sparing normal tissues. However, interfraction dose delivery introduces uncertainties to high dose estimation, which relates to normal tissue toxicity. The purpose of this study was to investigate...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00942-z |
_version_ | 1784585578863394816 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Binbing Hu, Weibiao Shan, Guoping Xu, Xiaoxian |
author_facet | Wang, Binbing Hu, Weibiao Shan, Guoping Xu, Xiaoxian |
author_sort | Wang, Binbing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy shows the ability to deliver high doses to tumors while sparing normal tissues. However, interfraction dose delivery introduces uncertainties to high dose estimation, which relates to normal tissue toxicity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the high-dose regions of two applicator approaches in brachytherapy. METHOD: For 32 cervical cancer patients, the CT images from each fraction were wrapped to a reference image, and the displacement vector field (DVF) was calculated with a hybrid intensity-based deformable registration algorithm. The fractional dose was then accumulated to calculate the position and the overlap of high dose (D2cc) during multiple fractions. RESULT: The overall Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the deformation algorithm for the bladder and the rectum was (0.97 and 0.91). No significant difference was observed between the two applicators. However, the location of the intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) high-dose region was relatively concentrated. The overlap volume of bladder and rectum D2cc was 0.42 and 0.71, respectively, which was higher than that of interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) (0.26 and 0.31). The cumulative dose was overestimated in ISBT cases when using the GEC-recommended method. The ratio of bladder and rectum D2cc to the GEC method was 0.99 and 1, respectively, which was higher than that of the ISBT method (0.96 and 0.94). CONCLUSION: High-dose regions for brachytherapy based on different applicator types were different. The 3D-printed ICBT has better high-dose region consistency than freehand ISBT and hence is more predictable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8524953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85249532021-10-22 Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy Wang, Binbing Hu, Weibiao Shan, Guoping Xu, Xiaoxian Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy shows the ability to deliver high doses to tumors while sparing normal tissues. However, interfraction dose delivery introduces uncertainties to high dose estimation, which relates to normal tissue toxicity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the high-dose regions of two applicator approaches in brachytherapy. METHOD: For 32 cervical cancer patients, the CT images from each fraction were wrapped to a reference image, and the displacement vector field (DVF) was calculated with a hybrid intensity-based deformable registration algorithm. The fractional dose was then accumulated to calculate the position and the overlap of high dose (D2cc) during multiple fractions. RESULT: The overall Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the deformation algorithm for the bladder and the rectum was (0.97 and 0.91). No significant difference was observed between the two applicators. However, the location of the intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) high-dose region was relatively concentrated. The overlap volume of bladder and rectum D2cc was 0.42 and 0.71, respectively, which was higher than that of interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) (0.26 and 0.31). The cumulative dose was overestimated in ISBT cases when using the GEC-recommended method. The ratio of bladder and rectum D2cc to the GEC method was 0.99 and 1, respectively, which was higher than that of the ISBT method (0.96 and 0.94). CONCLUSION: High-dose regions for brachytherapy based on different applicator types were different. The 3D-printed ICBT has better high-dose region consistency than freehand ISBT and hence is more predictable. BioMed Central 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8524953/ /pubmed/34663336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00942-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wang, Binbing Hu, Weibiao Shan, Guoping Xu, Xiaoxian Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy |
title | Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy |
title_full | Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy |
title_fullStr | Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy |
title_short | Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy |
title_sort | estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00942-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangbinbing estimatingtheaccumulativedoseuncertaintyforintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapy AT huweibiao estimatingtheaccumulativedoseuncertaintyforintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapy AT shanguoping estimatingtheaccumulativedoseuncertaintyforintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapy AT xuxiaoxian estimatingtheaccumulativedoseuncertaintyforintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapy |