Cargando…

Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy

BACKGROUND: Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy shows the ability to deliver high doses to tumors while sparing normal tissues. However, interfraction dose delivery introduces uncertainties to high dose estimation, which relates to normal tissue toxicity. The purpose of this study was to investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Binbing, Hu, Weibiao, Shan, Guoping, Xu, Xiaoxian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00942-z
_version_ 1784585578863394816
author Wang, Binbing
Hu, Weibiao
Shan, Guoping
Xu, Xiaoxian
author_facet Wang, Binbing
Hu, Weibiao
Shan, Guoping
Xu, Xiaoxian
author_sort Wang, Binbing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy shows the ability to deliver high doses to tumors while sparing normal tissues. However, interfraction dose delivery introduces uncertainties to high dose estimation, which relates to normal tissue toxicity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the high-dose regions of two applicator approaches in brachytherapy. METHOD: For 32 cervical cancer patients, the CT images from each fraction were wrapped to a reference image, and the displacement vector field (DVF) was calculated with a hybrid intensity-based deformable registration algorithm. The fractional dose was then accumulated to calculate the position and the overlap of high dose (D2cc) during multiple fractions. RESULT: The overall Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the deformation algorithm for the bladder and the rectum was (0.97 and 0.91). No significant difference was observed between the two applicators. However, the location of the intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) high-dose region was relatively concentrated. The overlap volume of bladder and rectum D2cc was 0.42 and 0.71, respectively, which was higher than that of interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) (0.26 and 0.31). The cumulative dose was overestimated in ISBT cases when using the GEC-recommended method. The ratio of bladder and rectum D2cc to the GEC method was 0.99 and 1, respectively, which was higher than that of the ISBT method (0.96 and 0.94). CONCLUSION: High-dose regions for brachytherapy based on different applicator types were different. The 3D-printed ICBT has better high-dose region consistency than freehand ISBT and hence is more predictable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8524953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85249532021-10-22 Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy Wang, Binbing Hu, Weibiao Shan, Guoping Xu, Xiaoxian Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy shows the ability to deliver high doses to tumors while sparing normal tissues. However, interfraction dose delivery introduces uncertainties to high dose estimation, which relates to normal tissue toxicity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the high-dose regions of two applicator approaches in brachytherapy. METHOD: For 32 cervical cancer patients, the CT images from each fraction were wrapped to a reference image, and the displacement vector field (DVF) was calculated with a hybrid intensity-based deformable registration algorithm. The fractional dose was then accumulated to calculate the position and the overlap of high dose (D2cc) during multiple fractions. RESULT: The overall Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the deformation algorithm for the bladder and the rectum was (0.97 and 0.91). No significant difference was observed between the two applicators. However, the location of the intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) high-dose region was relatively concentrated. The overlap volume of bladder and rectum D2cc was 0.42 and 0.71, respectively, which was higher than that of interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) (0.26 and 0.31). The cumulative dose was overestimated in ISBT cases when using the GEC-recommended method. The ratio of bladder and rectum D2cc to the GEC method was 0.99 and 1, respectively, which was higher than that of the ISBT method (0.96 and 0.94). CONCLUSION: High-dose regions for brachytherapy based on different applicator types were different. The 3D-printed ICBT has better high-dose region consistency than freehand ISBT and hence is more predictable. BioMed Central 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8524953/ /pubmed/34663336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00942-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Binbing
Hu, Weibiao
Shan, Guoping
Xu, Xiaoxian
Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy
title Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy
title_full Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy
title_fullStr Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy
title_short Estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy
title_sort estimating the accumulative dose uncertainty for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00942-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wangbinbing estimatingtheaccumulativedoseuncertaintyforintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapy
AT huweibiao estimatingtheaccumulativedoseuncertaintyforintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapy
AT shanguoping estimatingtheaccumulativedoseuncertaintyforintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapy
AT xuxiaoxian estimatingtheaccumulativedoseuncertaintyforintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapy