Cargando…

Leopard (Panthera pardus) occupancy in the Chure range of Nepal

Conservation of large carnivores such as leopards requires large and interconnected habitats. Despite the wide geographic range of the leopard globally, only 17% of their habitat is within protected areas. Leopards are widely distributed in Nepal, but their population status and occupancy are poorly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamichhane, Babu Ram, Lamichhane, Saneer, Regmi, Rajan, Dhungana, Milan, Thapa, Shyam Kumar, Prasai, Anil, Gurung, Aashish, Bhattarai, Santosh, Paudel, Rajan Prasad, Subedi, Naresh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34707806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8105
_version_ 1784585620947992576
author Lamichhane, Babu Ram
Lamichhane, Saneer
Regmi, Rajan
Dhungana, Milan
Thapa, Shyam Kumar
Prasai, Anil
Gurung, Aashish
Bhattarai, Santosh
Paudel, Rajan Prasad
Subedi, Naresh
author_facet Lamichhane, Babu Ram
Lamichhane, Saneer
Regmi, Rajan
Dhungana, Milan
Thapa, Shyam Kumar
Prasai, Anil
Gurung, Aashish
Bhattarai, Santosh
Paudel, Rajan Prasad
Subedi, Naresh
author_sort Lamichhane, Babu Ram
collection PubMed
description Conservation of large carnivores such as leopards requires large and interconnected habitats. Despite the wide geographic range of the leopard globally, only 17% of their habitat is within protected areas. Leopards are widely distributed in Nepal, but their population status and occupancy are poorly understood. We carried out the sign‐based leopard occupancy survey across the entire Chure range (~19,000 km(2)) to understand the habitat occupancy along with the covariates affecting their occupancy. Leopard signs were obtained from in 70 out of 223 grids surveyed, with a naïve leopard occupancy of 0.31. The model‐averaged leopard occupancy was estimated to be 0.5732 (SE 0.0082) with a replication‐level detection probability of 0.2554 (SE 0.1142). The top model shows the additive effect of wild boar, ruggedness, presence of livestock, and human population density positively affecting the leopard occupancy. The detection probability of leopard was higher outside the protected areas, less in the high NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) areas, and higher in the areas with livestock presence. The presence of wild boar was strong predictor of leopard occupancy followed by the presence of livestock, ruggedness, and human population density. Leopard occupancy was higher in west Chure (0.70 ± SE 0.047) having five protected areas compared with east Chure (0.46 ± SE 0.043) with no protected areas. Protected areas and prey species had positive influence on leopard occupancy in west Chure range. Similarly in the east Chure, the leopard occupancy increased with prey, NDVI, and terrain ruggedness. Enhanced law enforcement and mass awareness activities are necessary to reduce poaching/killing of wild ungulates and leopards in the Chure range to increase leopard occupancy. In addition, maintaining the sufficient natural prey base can contribute to minimize the livestock depredation and hence decrease the human–leopard conflict in the Chure range.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8525094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85250942021-10-26 Leopard (Panthera pardus) occupancy in the Chure range of Nepal Lamichhane, Babu Ram Lamichhane, Saneer Regmi, Rajan Dhungana, Milan Thapa, Shyam Kumar Prasai, Anil Gurung, Aashish Bhattarai, Santosh Paudel, Rajan Prasad Subedi, Naresh Ecol Evol Nature Notes Conservation of large carnivores such as leopards requires large and interconnected habitats. Despite the wide geographic range of the leopard globally, only 17% of their habitat is within protected areas. Leopards are widely distributed in Nepal, but their population status and occupancy are poorly understood. We carried out the sign‐based leopard occupancy survey across the entire Chure range (~19,000 km(2)) to understand the habitat occupancy along with the covariates affecting their occupancy. Leopard signs were obtained from in 70 out of 223 grids surveyed, with a naïve leopard occupancy of 0.31. The model‐averaged leopard occupancy was estimated to be 0.5732 (SE 0.0082) with a replication‐level detection probability of 0.2554 (SE 0.1142). The top model shows the additive effect of wild boar, ruggedness, presence of livestock, and human population density positively affecting the leopard occupancy. The detection probability of leopard was higher outside the protected areas, less in the high NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) areas, and higher in the areas with livestock presence. The presence of wild boar was strong predictor of leopard occupancy followed by the presence of livestock, ruggedness, and human population density. Leopard occupancy was higher in west Chure (0.70 ± SE 0.047) having five protected areas compared with east Chure (0.46 ± SE 0.043) with no protected areas. Protected areas and prey species had positive influence on leopard occupancy in west Chure range. Similarly in the east Chure, the leopard occupancy increased with prey, NDVI, and terrain ruggedness. Enhanced law enforcement and mass awareness activities are necessary to reduce poaching/killing of wild ungulates and leopards in the Chure range to increase leopard occupancy. In addition, maintaining the sufficient natural prey base can contribute to minimize the livestock depredation and hence decrease the human–leopard conflict in the Chure range. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8525094/ /pubmed/34707806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8105 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Nature Notes
Lamichhane, Babu Ram
Lamichhane, Saneer
Regmi, Rajan
Dhungana, Milan
Thapa, Shyam Kumar
Prasai, Anil
Gurung, Aashish
Bhattarai, Santosh
Paudel, Rajan Prasad
Subedi, Naresh
Leopard (Panthera pardus) occupancy in the Chure range of Nepal
title Leopard (Panthera pardus) occupancy in the Chure range of Nepal
title_full Leopard (Panthera pardus) occupancy in the Chure range of Nepal
title_fullStr Leopard (Panthera pardus) occupancy in the Chure range of Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Leopard (Panthera pardus) occupancy in the Chure range of Nepal
title_short Leopard (Panthera pardus) occupancy in the Chure range of Nepal
title_sort leopard (panthera pardus) occupancy in the chure range of nepal
topic Nature Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34707806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8105
work_keys_str_mv AT lamichhanebaburam leopardpantherapardusoccupancyinthechurerangeofnepal
AT lamichhanesaneer leopardpantherapardusoccupancyinthechurerangeofnepal
AT regmirajan leopardpantherapardusoccupancyinthechurerangeofnepal
AT dhunganamilan leopardpantherapardusoccupancyinthechurerangeofnepal
AT thapashyamkumar leopardpantherapardusoccupancyinthechurerangeofnepal
AT prasaianil leopardpantherapardusoccupancyinthechurerangeofnepal
AT gurungaashish leopardpantherapardusoccupancyinthechurerangeofnepal
AT bhattaraisantosh leopardpantherapardusoccupancyinthechurerangeofnepal
AT paudelrajanprasad leopardpantherapardusoccupancyinthechurerangeofnepal
AT subedinaresh leopardpantherapardusoccupancyinthechurerangeofnepal