Cargando…

Second‐ or third‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first‐line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in general population: Is there a real benefit?

INTRODUCTION: Since 2009, multiple randomized trials have shown faster and deeper responses in CML patients treated with new‐generation TKI (NG‐TKI) compared to those treated with imatinib (IM). Are the same results observed in the general population? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were identified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Canet, Jim, Cony‐Makhoul, Pascale, Orazio, Sébastien, Cornet, Edouard, Troussard, Xavier, Maynadié, Marc, Étienne, Gabriel, Monnereau, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4186
_version_ 1784585637257543680
author Canet, Jim
Cony‐Makhoul, Pascale
Orazio, Sébastien
Cornet, Edouard
Troussard, Xavier
Maynadié, Marc
Étienne, Gabriel
Monnereau, Alain
author_facet Canet, Jim
Cony‐Makhoul, Pascale
Orazio, Sébastien
Cornet, Edouard
Troussard, Xavier
Maynadié, Marc
Étienne, Gabriel
Monnereau, Alain
author_sort Canet, Jim
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Since 2009, multiple randomized trials have shown faster and deeper responses in CML patients treated with new‐generation TKI (NG‐TKI) compared to those treated with imatinib (IM). Are the same results observed in the general population? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were identified from the three French hematological malignancies population‐based registries. All CML patients (ICD‐O‐3: 9875/3) diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 and resided in registries areas were included. The TKI generation effect on achievement of MMR in first‐line therapy was assessed through a multivariate competitive risk analysis. An alluvial plot described the pathways leading to death. RESULTS: In total, 507 CML patients received TKI in first‐line treatment, 22% were enrolled in a clinical trial. After adjustment, NG‐TKI patients were significantly more likely to achieve MMR during first‐line therapy than IM patients (HR: 1.88 CI(95%) [1.35–2.61]). At the end of follow‐up, 212 patients were still in first‐line therapy (46 of them died), 203 switched to second‐line (43 subsequently died), 26 were on TFR from first‐line (4 subsequently died), and 20 stopped their treatment (16 subsequently died). DISCUSSION: In this comprehensive real‐life setting, the results were consistent with clinical trials. The results are not sufficient to conclude that a NG‐TKI treatment is superior with regard to these patients, despite indications regarding differences between the TKI generation effect on survival and tolerance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8525157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85251572021-10-26 Second‐ or third‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first‐line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in general population: Is there a real benefit? Canet, Jim Cony‐Makhoul, Pascale Orazio, Sébastien Cornet, Edouard Troussard, Xavier Maynadié, Marc Étienne, Gabriel Monnereau, Alain Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Researcher INTRODUCTION: Since 2009, multiple randomized trials have shown faster and deeper responses in CML patients treated with new‐generation TKI (NG‐TKI) compared to those treated with imatinib (IM). Are the same results observed in the general population? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were identified from the three French hematological malignancies population‐based registries. All CML patients (ICD‐O‐3: 9875/3) diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 and resided in registries areas were included. The TKI generation effect on achievement of MMR in first‐line therapy was assessed through a multivariate competitive risk analysis. An alluvial plot described the pathways leading to death. RESULTS: In total, 507 CML patients received TKI in first‐line treatment, 22% were enrolled in a clinical trial. After adjustment, NG‐TKI patients were significantly more likely to achieve MMR during first‐line therapy than IM patients (HR: 1.88 CI(95%) [1.35–2.61]). At the end of follow‐up, 212 patients were still in first‐line therapy (46 of them died), 203 switched to second‐line (43 subsequently died), 26 were on TFR from first‐line (4 subsequently died), and 20 stopped their treatment (16 subsequently died). DISCUSSION: In this comprehensive real‐life setting, the results were consistent with clinical trials. The results are not sufficient to conclude that a NG‐TKI treatment is superior with regard to these patients, despite indications regarding differences between the TKI generation effect on survival and tolerance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8525157/ /pubmed/34551198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4186 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Researcher
Canet, Jim
Cony‐Makhoul, Pascale
Orazio, Sébastien
Cornet, Edouard
Troussard, Xavier
Maynadié, Marc
Étienne, Gabriel
Monnereau, Alain
Second‐ or third‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first‐line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in general population: Is there a real benefit?
title Second‐ or third‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first‐line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in general population: Is there a real benefit?
title_full Second‐ or third‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first‐line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in general population: Is there a real benefit?
title_fullStr Second‐ or third‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first‐line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in general population: Is there a real benefit?
title_full_unstemmed Second‐ or third‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first‐line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in general population: Is there a real benefit?
title_short Second‐ or third‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first‐line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in general population: Is there a real benefit?
title_sort second‐ or third‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first‐line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in general population: is there a real benefit?
topic Clinical Cancer Researcher
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4186
work_keys_str_mv AT canetjim secondorthirdgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentofchronicmyeloidleukemiaingeneralpopulationistherearealbenefit
AT conymakhoulpascale secondorthirdgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentofchronicmyeloidleukemiaingeneralpopulationistherearealbenefit
AT oraziosebastien secondorthirdgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentofchronicmyeloidleukemiaingeneralpopulationistherearealbenefit
AT cornetedouard secondorthirdgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentofchronicmyeloidleukemiaingeneralpopulationistherearealbenefit
AT troussardxavier secondorthirdgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentofchronicmyeloidleukemiaingeneralpopulationistherearealbenefit
AT maynadiemarc secondorthirdgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentofchronicmyeloidleukemiaingeneralpopulationistherearealbenefit
AT etiennegabriel secondorthirdgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentofchronicmyeloidleukemiaingeneralpopulationistherearealbenefit
AT monnereaualain secondorthirdgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentofchronicmyeloidleukemiaingeneralpopulationistherearealbenefit