Cargando…
The role of deep learning‐based survival model in improving survival prediction of patients with glioblastoma
This retrospective study has been conducted to validate the performance of deep learning‐based survival models in glioblastoma (GBM) patients alongside the Cox proportional hazards model (CoxPH) and the random survival forest (RSF). Furthermore, the effect of hyperparameters optimization methods on...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4230 |
_version_ | 1784585638434045952 |
---|---|
author | Moradmand, Hajar Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza Ghaderi, Reza Emami, Hamid |
author_facet | Moradmand, Hajar Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza Ghaderi, Reza Emami, Hamid |
author_sort | Moradmand, Hajar |
collection | PubMed |
description | This retrospective study has been conducted to validate the performance of deep learning‐based survival models in glioblastoma (GBM) patients alongside the Cox proportional hazards model (CoxPH) and the random survival forest (RSF). Furthermore, the effect of hyperparameters optimization methods on improving the prediction accuracy of deep learning‐based survival models was investigated. Of the 305 cases, 260 GBM patients were included in our analysis based on the following criteria: demographic information (i.e., age, Karnofsky performance score, gender, and race), tumor characteristic (i.e., laterality and location), details of post‐surgical treatment (i.e., time to initiate concurrent chemoradiation therapy, standard treatment, and radiotherapy techniques), and last follow‐up time as well as the molecular markers (i.e., O‐6‐methylguanine methyltransferase and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 status). Experimental results have demonstrated that age (Elderly > 65: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.213–2.18; p value = 0.001) and tumors located at multiple lobes ([HR] = 1.75; 95% [CI]: 1.177–2.61; p value = 0.006) were associated with poorer prognosis. In contrast, age (young < 40: [HR] = 0.57; 95% [CI]: 0.343–0.96; p value = 0.034) and type of radiotherapy (others include stereotactic and brachytherapy: [HR] = 0.5; 95%[CI]: 0.266–0.95; p value = 0.035) were significantly related to better prognosis. Furthermore, the proposed deep learning‐based survival model (concordance index [c‐index] = 0.823 configured by Bayesian hyperparameter optimization), outperformed the RSF (c‐index = 0.728), and the CoxPH model (c‐index = 0.713) in the training dataset. Our results show the ability of deep learning in learning a complex association of risk factors. Moreover, the remarkable performance of the deep‐learning‐based survival model could be promising to support decision‐making systems in personalized medicine for patients with GBM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8525162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85251622021-10-26 The role of deep learning‐based survival model in improving survival prediction of patients with glioblastoma Moradmand, Hajar Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza Ghaderi, Reza Emami, Hamid Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Researcher This retrospective study has been conducted to validate the performance of deep learning‐based survival models in glioblastoma (GBM) patients alongside the Cox proportional hazards model (CoxPH) and the random survival forest (RSF). Furthermore, the effect of hyperparameters optimization methods on improving the prediction accuracy of deep learning‐based survival models was investigated. Of the 305 cases, 260 GBM patients were included in our analysis based on the following criteria: demographic information (i.e., age, Karnofsky performance score, gender, and race), tumor characteristic (i.e., laterality and location), details of post‐surgical treatment (i.e., time to initiate concurrent chemoradiation therapy, standard treatment, and radiotherapy techniques), and last follow‐up time as well as the molecular markers (i.e., O‐6‐methylguanine methyltransferase and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 status). Experimental results have demonstrated that age (Elderly > 65: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.213–2.18; p value = 0.001) and tumors located at multiple lobes ([HR] = 1.75; 95% [CI]: 1.177–2.61; p value = 0.006) were associated with poorer prognosis. In contrast, age (young < 40: [HR] = 0.57; 95% [CI]: 0.343–0.96; p value = 0.034) and type of radiotherapy (others include stereotactic and brachytherapy: [HR] = 0.5; 95%[CI]: 0.266–0.95; p value = 0.035) were significantly related to better prognosis. Furthermore, the proposed deep learning‐based survival model (concordance index [c‐index] = 0.823 configured by Bayesian hyperparameter optimization), outperformed the RSF (c‐index = 0.728), and the CoxPH model (c‐index = 0.713) in the training dataset. Our results show the ability of deep learning in learning a complex association of risk factors. Moreover, the remarkable performance of the deep‐learning‐based survival model could be promising to support decision‐making systems in personalized medicine for patients with GBM. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8525162/ /pubmed/34453413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4230 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Researcher Moradmand, Hajar Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza Ghaderi, Reza Emami, Hamid The role of deep learning‐based survival model in improving survival prediction of patients with glioblastoma |
title | The role of deep learning‐based survival model in improving survival prediction of patients with glioblastoma |
title_full | The role of deep learning‐based survival model in improving survival prediction of patients with glioblastoma |
title_fullStr | The role of deep learning‐based survival model in improving survival prediction of patients with glioblastoma |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of deep learning‐based survival model in improving survival prediction of patients with glioblastoma |
title_short | The role of deep learning‐based survival model in improving survival prediction of patients with glioblastoma |
title_sort | role of deep learning‐based survival model in improving survival prediction of patients with glioblastoma |
topic | Clinical Cancer Researcher |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moradmandhajar theroleofdeeplearningbasedsurvivalmodelinimprovingsurvivalpredictionofpatientswithglioblastoma AT aghamiriseyedmahmoudreza theroleofdeeplearningbasedsurvivalmodelinimprovingsurvivalpredictionofpatientswithglioblastoma AT ghaderireza theroleofdeeplearningbasedsurvivalmodelinimprovingsurvivalpredictionofpatientswithglioblastoma AT emamihamid theroleofdeeplearningbasedsurvivalmodelinimprovingsurvivalpredictionofpatientswithglioblastoma AT moradmandhajar roleofdeeplearningbasedsurvivalmodelinimprovingsurvivalpredictionofpatientswithglioblastoma AT aghamiriseyedmahmoudreza roleofdeeplearningbasedsurvivalmodelinimprovingsurvivalpredictionofpatientswithglioblastoma AT ghaderireza roleofdeeplearningbasedsurvivalmodelinimprovingsurvivalpredictionofpatientswithglioblastoma AT emamihamid roleofdeeplearningbasedsurvivalmodelinimprovingsurvivalpredictionofpatientswithglioblastoma |