Cargando…

Does the intensive grazing and aridity change the relations between the dominant shrub Artemisia kopetdaghensis and plants under its canopies?

The interspecific plant interactions along grazing and aridity stress gradients represent a major research issue in plant ecology. However, the combined effects of these two factors on plant–plant interactions have been poorly studied in the northeast of Iran. To fill this knowledge gap, 144 plots w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahmanian, Soroor, Ejtehadi, Hamid, Farzam, Mohammad, Hejda, Martin, Memariani, Farshid, Pyšek, Petr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34707844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8124
_version_ 1784585639371472896
author Rahmanian, Soroor
Ejtehadi, Hamid
Farzam, Mohammad
Hejda, Martin
Memariani, Farshid
Pyšek, Petr
author_facet Rahmanian, Soroor
Ejtehadi, Hamid
Farzam, Mohammad
Hejda, Martin
Memariani, Farshid
Pyšek, Petr
author_sort Rahmanian, Soroor
collection PubMed
description The interspecific plant interactions along grazing and aridity stress gradients represent a major research issue in plant ecology. However, the combined effects of these two factors on plant–plant interactions have been poorly studied in the northeast of Iran. To fill this knowledge gap, 144 plots were established in 12 study sites with different grazing intensities (high vs. low) and climatic characteristics (arid vs. semiarid) in northeastern Iran. A dominant shrub, Artemisia kopetdaghensis, was selected as the model species. Further, we studied changes in plant life strategies along the combined grazing and aridity stress gradients. In this study, we used relative interaction indices calculated for species richness, Shannon diversity, and species cover to determine plant–plant interactions using linear mixed‐effect models (LMM). The indicator species analysis was used to identify the indicator species for the undercanopy of shrub and for the adjacent open areas. The combined effects of grazing and aridity affected the plant–plant interactions and plant life strategies (CSR) of indicator species. A. kopetdaghensis showed the highest facilitation effect under high stress conditions (high grazing, high aridity), which turned into competition under the low stress conditions (low grazing, low aridity). In the arid region, the canopy of the shrub protected ruderals, annual forbs, and grasses in both high and low grazing intensities. In the semiarid region and high grazing intensity (low aridity/high grazing), the shrubs protected mostly perennial forbs with C‐strategy. Our findings highlight the importance of context‐dependent shrub management to restore the vegetation damaged by the intensive grazing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8525166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85251662021-10-26 Does the intensive grazing and aridity change the relations between the dominant shrub Artemisia kopetdaghensis and plants under its canopies? Rahmanian, Soroor Ejtehadi, Hamid Farzam, Mohammad Hejda, Martin Memariani, Farshid Pyšek, Petr Ecol Evol Research Articles The interspecific plant interactions along grazing and aridity stress gradients represent a major research issue in plant ecology. However, the combined effects of these two factors on plant–plant interactions have been poorly studied in the northeast of Iran. To fill this knowledge gap, 144 plots were established in 12 study sites with different grazing intensities (high vs. low) and climatic characteristics (arid vs. semiarid) in northeastern Iran. A dominant shrub, Artemisia kopetdaghensis, was selected as the model species. Further, we studied changes in plant life strategies along the combined grazing and aridity stress gradients. In this study, we used relative interaction indices calculated for species richness, Shannon diversity, and species cover to determine plant–plant interactions using linear mixed‐effect models (LMM). The indicator species analysis was used to identify the indicator species for the undercanopy of shrub and for the adjacent open areas. The combined effects of grazing and aridity affected the plant–plant interactions and plant life strategies (CSR) of indicator species. A. kopetdaghensis showed the highest facilitation effect under high stress conditions (high grazing, high aridity), which turned into competition under the low stress conditions (low grazing, low aridity). In the arid region, the canopy of the shrub protected ruderals, annual forbs, and grasses in both high and low grazing intensities. In the semiarid region and high grazing intensity (low aridity/high grazing), the shrubs protected mostly perennial forbs with C‐strategy. Our findings highlight the importance of context‐dependent shrub management to restore the vegetation damaged by the intensive grazing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8525166/ /pubmed/34707844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8124 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Rahmanian, Soroor
Ejtehadi, Hamid
Farzam, Mohammad
Hejda, Martin
Memariani, Farshid
Pyšek, Petr
Does the intensive grazing and aridity change the relations between the dominant shrub Artemisia kopetdaghensis and plants under its canopies?
title Does the intensive grazing and aridity change the relations between the dominant shrub Artemisia kopetdaghensis and plants under its canopies?
title_full Does the intensive grazing and aridity change the relations between the dominant shrub Artemisia kopetdaghensis and plants under its canopies?
title_fullStr Does the intensive grazing and aridity change the relations between the dominant shrub Artemisia kopetdaghensis and plants under its canopies?
title_full_unstemmed Does the intensive grazing and aridity change the relations between the dominant shrub Artemisia kopetdaghensis and plants under its canopies?
title_short Does the intensive grazing and aridity change the relations between the dominant shrub Artemisia kopetdaghensis and plants under its canopies?
title_sort does the intensive grazing and aridity change the relations between the dominant shrub artemisia kopetdaghensis and plants under its canopies?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34707844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8124
work_keys_str_mv AT rahmaniansoroor doestheintensivegrazingandariditychangetherelationsbetweenthedominantshrubartemisiakopetdaghensisandplantsunderitscanopies
AT ejtehadihamid doestheintensivegrazingandariditychangetherelationsbetweenthedominantshrubartemisiakopetdaghensisandplantsunderitscanopies
AT farzammohammad doestheintensivegrazingandariditychangetherelationsbetweenthedominantshrubartemisiakopetdaghensisandplantsunderitscanopies
AT hejdamartin doestheintensivegrazingandariditychangetherelationsbetweenthedominantshrubartemisiakopetdaghensisandplantsunderitscanopies
AT memarianifarshid doestheintensivegrazingandariditychangetherelationsbetweenthedominantshrubartemisiakopetdaghensisandplantsunderitscanopies
AT pysekpetr doestheintensivegrazingandariditychangetherelationsbetweenthedominantshrubartemisiakopetdaghensisandplantsunderitscanopies