Cargando…

Quality assurance review: Intra‐operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative consultation (IOC) of axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy continues to play a role in selected breast cancer patients. The reported sensitivity rates for intraoperative SLN evaluation in breast cancer range from 47% to 80%. We study a center where the majority of SLN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aldoheyan, Tamadar, Klein, Julianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34533281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4264
_version_ 1784585641136226304
author Aldoheyan, Tamadar
Klein, Julianne
author_facet Aldoheyan, Tamadar
Klein, Julianne
author_sort Aldoheyan, Tamadar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraoperative consultation (IOC) of axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy continues to play a role in selected breast cancer patients. The reported sensitivity rates for intraoperative SLN evaluation in breast cancer range from 47% to 80%. We study a center where the majority of SLN IOC is performed by imprint cytology, and a protocol was established to limit microscopic examination to three slides for a reporting TAT goal of 30 min. METHODS: Approval to conduct this study was obtained from the REB. A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive SLN cases sent for IOC. Reported IOC assessments of all cases were compared with the final pathology. RESULTS: Of 164 patients, there were 22 (13%) false negative IOC events, including 15 missed macro‐metastasis and 7 missed micro‐metastasis. The overall sensitivity for touch imprint in detecting SLNs macro‐metastasis was 70.9%. Reporting total turnaround time was on average 3 min longer, whereas sensitivity and specificity were not significantly different in the two protocol periods. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an IOC policy for a maximum of three slides for imprint cytology did not result in a significant impact on the sensitivity, specificity, or total turnaround time for SLN in breast cancer patients. False negative IOC events were mainly due to sampling error. Quality review was made difficult by limited documentation related to the gross handling of the specimens at IOC. System factors identified include insufficient space for the IOC report on the pathology requisition, and the lack of clearly communicated expectations for documentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8525174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85251742021-10-26 Quality assurance review: Intra‐operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer Aldoheyan, Tamadar Klein, Julianne Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Researcher BACKGROUND: Intraoperative consultation (IOC) of axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy continues to play a role in selected breast cancer patients. The reported sensitivity rates for intraoperative SLN evaluation in breast cancer range from 47% to 80%. We study a center where the majority of SLN IOC is performed by imprint cytology, and a protocol was established to limit microscopic examination to three slides for a reporting TAT goal of 30 min. METHODS: Approval to conduct this study was obtained from the REB. A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive SLN cases sent for IOC. Reported IOC assessments of all cases were compared with the final pathology. RESULTS: Of 164 patients, there were 22 (13%) false negative IOC events, including 15 missed macro‐metastasis and 7 missed micro‐metastasis. The overall sensitivity for touch imprint in detecting SLNs macro‐metastasis was 70.9%. Reporting total turnaround time was on average 3 min longer, whereas sensitivity and specificity were not significantly different in the two protocol periods. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an IOC policy for a maximum of three slides for imprint cytology did not result in a significant impact on the sensitivity, specificity, or total turnaround time for SLN in breast cancer patients. False negative IOC events were mainly due to sampling error. Quality review was made difficult by limited documentation related to the gross handling of the specimens at IOC. System factors identified include insufficient space for the IOC report on the pathology requisition, and the lack of clearly communicated expectations for documentation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8525174/ /pubmed/34533281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4264 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Researcher
Aldoheyan, Tamadar
Klein, Julianne
Quality assurance review: Intra‐operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer
title Quality assurance review: Intra‐operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer
title_full Quality assurance review: Intra‐operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer
title_fullStr Quality assurance review: Intra‐operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Quality assurance review: Intra‐operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer
title_short Quality assurance review: Intra‐operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer
title_sort quality assurance review: intra‐operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer
topic Clinical Cancer Researcher
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34533281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4264
work_keys_str_mv AT aldoheyantamadar qualityassurancereviewintraoperativeevaluationofsentinellymphnodesinbreastcancer
AT kleinjulianne qualityassurancereviewintraoperativeevaluationofsentinellymphnodesinbreastcancer