Cargando…

Evolving Institutional Arrangements for use of an ecosystem approach in restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern

The 1987 Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement required Remedial Action Plans (RAPs) be collaboratively generated between local stakeholders and government agencies to implement an ecosystem approach in cleaning up 43 historically polluted Areas of Concern (AOCs) throughout the Laurentian...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alsip, Peter J., Hartig, John H., Krantzberg, Gail, Williams, Kathleen C., Wondolleck, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34676112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13031532
_version_ 1784585664376864768
author Alsip, Peter J.
Hartig, John H.
Krantzberg, Gail
Williams, Kathleen C.
Wondolleck, Julia
author_facet Alsip, Peter J.
Hartig, John H.
Krantzberg, Gail
Williams, Kathleen C.
Wondolleck, Julia
author_sort Alsip, Peter J.
collection PubMed
description The 1987 Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement required Remedial Action Plans (RAPs) be collaboratively generated between local stakeholders and government agencies to implement an ecosystem approach in cleaning up 43 historically polluted Areas of Concern (AOCs) throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes. The institutional arrangements that have emerged over the past 35 years to foster an ecosystem approach in RAPs are expected to have changed over time and be varied in some aspects—reflecting unique socio-ecological contexts of each AOC—while also sharing some characteristics that were either derived from the minimally prescribed framework or developed convergently. Here we surveyed institutional arrangements to describe changes over time relevant to advancing an ecosystem approach in restoring beneficial uses in the 43 AOCs. While eight AOCs evidenced little institutional change, the remaining 35 AOCs demonstrated a growing involvement of local organizations in RAPs, which has enhanced local capacity and ownership and helped strengthen connections to broader watershed initiatives. We also noted an expansion of strategic partnerships that has strengthened science-policy-management linkages and an increasing emphasis on sustainability among RAP institutions. Our study details how institutional arrangements in a decentralized restoration program have evolved to implement an ecosystem approach and address new challenges
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8525309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85253092022-02-01 Evolving Institutional Arrangements for use of an ecosystem approach in restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern Alsip, Peter J. Hartig, John H. Krantzberg, Gail Williams, Kathleen C. Wondolleck, Julia Sustainability Article The 1987 Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement required Remedial Action Plans (RAPs) be collaboratively generated between local stakeholders and government agencies to implement an ecosystem approach in cleaning up 43 historically polluted Areas of Concern (AOCs) throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes. The institutional arrangements that have emerged over the past 35 years to foster an ecosystem approach in RAPs are expected to have changed over time and be varied in some aspects—reflecting unique socio-ecological contexts of each AOC—while also sharing some characteristics that were either derived from the minimally prescribed framework or developed convergently. Here we surveyed institutional arrangements to describe changes over time relevant to advancing an ecosystem approach in restoring beneficial uses in the 43 AOCs. While eight AOCs evidenced little institutional change, the remaining 35 AOCs demonstrated a growing involvement of local organizations in RAPs, which has enhanced local capacity and ownership and helped strengthen connections to broader watershed initiatives. We also noted an expansion of strategic partnerships that has strengthened science-policy-management linkages and an increasing emphasis on sustainability among RAP institutions. Our study details how institutional arrangements in a decentralized restoration program have evolved to implement an ecosystem approach and address new challenges 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8525309/ /pubmed/34676112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13031532 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Alsip, Peter J.
Hartig, John H.
Krantzberg, Gail
Williams, Kathleen C.
Wondolleck, Julia
Evolving Institutional Arrangements for use of an ecosystem approach in restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern
title Evolving Institutional Arrangements for use of an ecosystem approach in restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern
title_full Evolving Institutional Arrangements for use of an ecosystem approach in restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern
title_fullStr Evolving Institutional Arrangements for use of an ecosystem approach in restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern
title_full_unstemmed Evolving Institutional Arrangements for use of an ecosystem approach in restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern
title_short Evolving Institutional Arrangements for use of an ecosystem approach in restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern
title_sort evolving institutional arrangements for use of an ecosystem approach in restoring great lakes areas of concern
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34676112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13031532
work_keys_str_mv AT alsippeterj evolvinginstitutionalarrangementsforuseofanecosystemapproachinrestoringgreatlakesareasofconcern
AT hartigjohnh evolvinginstitutionalarrangementsforuseofanecosystemapproachinrestoringgreatlakesareasofconcern
AT krantzberggail evolvinginstitutionalarrangementsforuseofanecosystemapproachinrestoringgreatlakesareasofconcern
AT williamskathleenc evolvinginstitutionalarrangementsforuseofanecosystemapproachinrestoringgreatlakesareasofconcern
AT wondolleckjulia evolvinginstitutionalarrangementsforuseofanecosystemapproachinrestoringgreatlakesareasofconcern