Cargando…

Indivisibilité, Sécurité, Laïcité: the French ban on the burqa and the niqab

In France, secularism is celebrated in the public sphere. The paper makes general arguments about France’s changing identity and specific arguments about the burqa and niqab ban. It explains how French history shaped the ideology of secularism and of public civil religion, and how colonial legacy, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cohen-Almagor, Raphael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Palgrave Macmillan UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525454/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41253-021-00164-8
_version_ 1784585689755549696
author Cohen-Almagor, Raphael
author_facet Cohen-Almagor, Raphael
author_sort Cohen-Almagor, Raphael
collection PubMed
description In France, secularism is celebrated in the public sphere. The paper makes general arguments about France’s changing identity and specific arguments about the burqa and niqab ban. It explains how French history shaped the ideology of secularism and of public civil religion, and how colonial legacy, immigration, fear of terrorism and security needs have led France to adopt the trinity of indivisibilité, sécurité, laïcité while paying homage to the traditional trinity of liberté, égalité, fraternité. While the motto of the French Revolution is still symbolically and politically important, its practical significance as it has been translated to policy implementation has been eroded. The emergence of the new trinity at the expense of the old one is evident when analyzing the debates concerning cultural policies in France in the face of the Islamic garb, the burqa and the niqab, which are perceived as a challenge to France’s national secular raison d'être. The French Republic has attempted to keep public space secular. Is the burqa and niqab ban socially just? Does it reasonably balance the preservation of societal values and freedom of conscience? It is argued that the burqa and niqab ban is neither just nor reasonable in the eyes of the women and girls who wish to wear the Muslim garb, their families and community, and that paternalism that holds that the ban is for the women’s own good is a poor, coercive excuse. Claims for paternalistic coercion to protect adult women from their own culture when they do not ask for protection are not sufficiently reasonable to receive vindication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8525454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Palgrave Macmillan UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85254542021-10-20 Indivisibilité, Sécurité, Laïcité: the French ban on the burqa and the niqab Cohen-Almagor, Raphael Fr Polit Original Article In France, secularism is celebrated in the public sphere. The paper makes general arguments about France’s changing identity and specific arguments about the burqa and niqab ban. It explains how French history shaped the ideology of secularism and of public civil religion, and how colonial legacy, immigration, fear of terrorism and security needs have led France to adopt the trinity of indivisibilité, sécurité, laïcité while paying homage to the traditional trinity of liberté, égalité, fraternité. While the motto of the French Revolution is still symbolically and politically important, its practical significance as it has been translated to policy implementation has been eroded. The emergence of the new trinity at the expense of the old one is evident when analyzing the debates concerning cultural policies in France in the face of the Islamic garb, the burqa and the niqab, which are perceived as a challenge to France’s national secular raison d'être. The French Republic has attempted to keep public space secular. Is the burqa and niqab ban socially just? Does it reasonably balance the preservation of societal values and freedom of conscience? It is argued that the burqa and niqab ban is neither just nor reasonable in the eyes of the women and girls who wish to wear the Muslim garb, their families and community, and that paternalism that holds that the ban is for the women’s own good is a poor, coercive excuse. Claims for paternalistic coercion to protect adult women from their own culture when they do not ask for protection are not sufficiently reasonable to receive vindication. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2021-10-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8525454/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41253-021-00164-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cohen-Almagor, Raphael
Indivisibilité, Sécurité, Laïcité: the French ban on the burqa and the niqab
title Indivisibilité, Sécurité, Laïcité: the French ban on the burqa and the niqab
title_full Indivisibilité, Sécurité, Laïcité: the French ban on the burqa and the niqab
title_fullStr Indivisibilité, Sécurité, Laïcité: the French ban on the burqa and the niqab
title_full_unstemmed Indivisibilité, Sécurité, Laïcité: the French ban on the burqa and the niqab
title_short Indivisibilité, Sécurité, Laïcité: the French ban on the burqa and the niqab
title_sort indivisibilité, sécurité, laïcité: the french ban on the burqa and the niqab
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525454/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41253-021-00164-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cohenalmagorraphael indivisibilitesecuritelaicitethefrenchbanontheburqaandtheniqab