Cargando…
Using a new diagnostic tool to predict lymph node metastasis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer leads to simple lymphadenectomy decision rules: A multicentre study from the FRANCOGYN group
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a new diagnostic tool to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The FRANCOGYN group’s multicenter retrospective ovarian cancer cohort furni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34665839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258783 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a new diagnostic tool to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The FRANCOGYN group’s multicenter retrospective ovarian cancer cohort furnished the patient population on which we developed a logistic regression model. The prediction model equation enabled us to create LNM risk groups with simple lymphadenectomy decision rules associated with a user-friendly free interactive web application called shinyLNM. RESULTS: 277 patients from the FRANCOGYN cohort were included; 115 with no LNM and 162 with LNM. Three variables were independently and significantly (p<0.05) associated with LNM in multivariate analysis: pelvic and/or para-aortic LNM on CT and/or PET/CT (p<0.00), initial PCI ≥ 10 and/or diaphragmatic carcinosis (p = 0.02), and initial CA125 ≥ 500 (p = 0.02). The ROC-AUC of this prediction model after leave-one-out cross-validation was 0.72. There was no difference between the predicted and the observed probabilities of LNM (p = 0.09). Specificity for the group at high risk of LNM was 83.5%, the LR+ was 2.73, and the observed probability of LNM was 79.3%; sensitivity for the group at low-risk of LNM was 92.0%, the LR- was 0.24, and the observed probability of LNM was 25.0%. CONCLUSION: This new tool may prove useful for improving surgical planning and provide useful information for patients. |
---|