Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Three Esthetic Restorative Materials – An In-vitro Study

CONTEXT: Microleakage is the major cause for the failure of dental restorations, especially in Class V cavities, as margins of such restorations are generally located in dentin or cementum. Microleakage evaluation is necessary as a means of evaluation of the marginal integrity of restorative materia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Sukhdeep, Goel, Dhirja, Awasthi, Neha, Khandelwal, Deepak, Sharma, Aakansha, Patil, Seema
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34759680
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_318_20
_version_ 1784585760188399616
author Singh, Sukhdeep
Goel, Dhirja
Awasthi, Neha
Khandelwal, Deepak
Sharma, Aakansha
Patil, Seema
author_facet Singh, Sukhdeep
Goel, Dhirja
Awasthi, Neha
Khandelwal, Deepak
Sharma, Aakansha
Patil, Seema
author_sort Singh, Sukhdeep
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Microleakage is the major cause for the failure of dental restorations, especially in Class V cavities, as margins of such restorations are generally located in dentin or cementum. Microleakage evaluation is necessary as a means of evaluation of the marginal integrity of restorative materials. This would assist in developing techniques and materials that would reduce damage caused by the failure of the restorative marginal seal. AIM: The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the marginal integrity among three esthetic restorative materials, namely GC Fuji II LC, GC G-Aenial anterior composite resin, and GC Equia forte fil. SETTING AND DESIGN: Sixty orthodontically extracted caries-free premolar teeth with Class V restorations were divided into three groups. Microleakage was measured using an ordinal scale of 0–4, as given by Khera and Chan, in increasing order of dye penetration, which was observed under a microscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study was conducted in sound human extracted premolars in which Standardized Class V cavities were prepared. Teeth were randomly and equally assigned to three groups (GC Fuji II LC, GC G-Aenial anterior composite resin, and GC Equia forte fil). Teeth were sectioned longitudinally into two halves using diamond discs and the sectioned halves of the teeth were evaluated for dye penetration under stereomicroscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Intergroup comparison of mean dye penetration scores were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test along with post hoc pairwise comparison by Mann Whitney U test. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: All the three groups (GC Fuji II LC, GC G-Aenial anterior composite resin, and GC Equia forte fil) tested showed microleakage at the tooth restoration interface. It was evident that microleakage was found to be highest with the Fuji II LC, both at occlusal and cervical levels. GC Equia forte exhibited the best performance in limiting microleakage around the restoration margins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8525820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85258202021-11-09 Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Three Esthetic Restorative Materials – An In-vitro Study Singh, Sukhdeep Goel, Dhirja Awasthi, Neha Khandelwal, Deepak Sharma, Aakansha Patil, Seema Contemp Clin Dent Original Article CONTEXT: Microleakage is the major cause for the failure of dental restorations, especially in Class V cavities, as margins of such restorations are generally located in dentin or cementum. Microleakage evaluation is necessary as a means of evaluation of the marginal integrity of restorative materials. This would assist in developing techniques and materials that would reduce damage caused by the failure of the restorative marginal seal. AIM: The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the marginal integrity among three esthetic restorative materials, namely GC Fuji II LC, GC G-Aenial anterior composite resin, and GC Equia forte fil. SETTING AND DESIGN: Sixty orthodontically extracted caries-free premolar teeth with Class V restorations were divided into three groups. Microleakage was measured using an ordinal scale of 0–4, as given by Khera and Chan, in increasing order of dye penetration, which was observed under a microscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study was conducted in sound human extracted premolars in which Standardized Class V cavities were prepared. Teeth were randomly and equally assigned to three groups (GC Fuji II LC, GC G-Aenial anterior composite resin, and GC Equia forte fil). Teeth were sectioned longitudinally into two halves using diamond discs and the sectioned halves of the teeth were evaluated for dye penetration under stereomicroscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Intergroup comparison of mean dye penetration scores were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test along with post hoc pairwise comparison by Mann Whitney U test. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: All the three groups (GC Fuji II LC, GC G-Aenial anterior composite resin, and GC Equia forte fil) tested showed microleakage at the tooth restoration interface. It was evident that microleakage was found to be highest with the Fuji II LC, both at occlusal and cervical levels. GC Equia forte exhibited the best performance in limiting microleakage around the restoration margins. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8525820/ /pubmed/34759680 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_318_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Sukhdeep
Goel, Dhirja
Awasthi, Neha
Khandelwal, Deepak
Sharma, Aakansha
Patil, Seema
Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Three Esthetic Restorative Materials – An In-vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Three Esthetic Restorative Materials – An In-vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Three Esthetic Restorative Materials – An In-vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Three Esthetic Restorative Materials – An In-vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Three Esthetic Restorative Materials – An In-vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Three Esthetic Restorative Materials – An In-vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of three esthetic restorative materials – an in-vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34759680
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_318_20
work_keys_str_mv AT singhsukhdeep comparativeevaluationofmarginalintegrityofthreeestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT goeldhirja comparativeevaluationofmarginalintegrityofthreeestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT awasthineha comparativeevaluationofmarginalintegrityofthreeestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT khandelwaldeepak comparativeevaluationofmarginalintegrityofthreeestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT sharmaaakansha comparativeevaluationofmarginalintegrityofthreeestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT patilseema comparativeevaluationofmarginalintegrityofthreeestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy