Cargando…

The retinal and perceived locus of fixation in the human visual system

Due to the dramatic difference in spatial resolution between the central fovea and the surrounding retinal regions, accurate fixation on important objects is critical for humans. It is known that the preferred retinal location (PRL) for fixation of healthy human observers rarely coincides with the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kilpeläinen, Markku, Putnam, Nicole M., Ratnam, Kavitha, Roorda, Austin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.11.9
_version_ 1784585762374680576
author Kilpeläinen, Markku
Putnam, Nicole M.
Ratnam, Kavitha
Roorda, Austin
author_facet Kilpeläinen, Markku
Putnam, Nicole M.
Ratnam, Kavitha
Roorda, Austin
author_sort Kilpeläinen, Markku
collection PubMed
description Due to the dramatic difference in spatial resolution between the central fovea and the surrounding retinal regions, accurate fixation on important objects is critical for humans. It is known that the preferred retinal location (PRL) for fixation of healthy human observers rarely coincides with the retinal location with the highest cone density. It is not currently known, however, whether the PRL is consistent within an observer or is subject to fluctuations and, moreover, whether observers’ subjective fixation location coincides with the PRL. We studied whether the PRL changes between days. We used an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope to project a Maltese cross fixation target on an observer's retina and continuously imaged the exact retinal location of the target. We found that observers consistently use the same PRL across days, regardless of how much the PRL is displaced from the cone density peak location. We then showed observers small stimuli near the visual field location on which they fixated, and the observers judged whether or not the stimuli appeared in fixation. Observers’ precision in this task approached that of fixation itself. Observers based their judgment on both the visual scene coordinates and the retinal location of the stimuli. We conclude that the PRL in a normally functioning visual system is fixed, and observers use it as a reference point in judging stimulus locations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8525830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85258302021-10-28 The retinal and perceived locus of fixation in the human visual system Kilpeläinen, Markku Putnam, Nicole M. Ratnam, Kavitha Roorda, Austin J Vis Article Due to the dramatic difference in spatial resolution between the central fovea and the surrounding retinal regions, accurate fixation on important objects is critical for humans. It is known that the preferred retinal location (PRL) for fixation of healthy human observers rarely coincides with the retinal location with the highest cone density. It is not currently known, however, whether the PRL is consistent within an observer or is subject to fluctuations and, moreover, whether observers’ subjective fixation location coincides with the PRL. We studied whether the PRL changes between days. We used an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope to project a Maltese cross fixation target on an observer's retina and continuously imaged the exact retinal location of the target. We found that observers consistently use the same PRL across days, regardless of how much the PRL is displaced from the cone density peak location. We then showed observers small stimuli near the visual field location on which they fixated, and the observers judged whether or not the stimuli appeared in fixation. Observers’ precision in this task approached that of fixation itself. Observers based their judgment on both the visual scene coordinates and the retinal location of the stimuli. We conclude that the PRL in a normally functioning visual system is fixed, and observers use it as a reference point in judging stimulus locations. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8525830/ /pubmed/34643658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.11.9 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Kilpeläinen, Markku
Putnam, Nicole M.
Ratnam, Kavitha
Roorda, Austin
The retinal and perceived locus of fixation in the human visual system
title The retinal and perceived locus of fixation in the human visual system
title_full The retinal and perceived locus of fixation in the human visual system
title_fullStr The retinal and perceived locus of fixation in the human visual system
title_full_unstemmed The retinal and perceived locus of fixation in the human visual system
title_short The retinal and perceived locus of fixation in the human visual system
title_sort retinal and perceived locus of fixation in the human visual system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.11.9
work_keys_str_mv AT kilpelainenmarkku theretinalandperceivedlocusoffixationinthehumanvisualsystem
AT putnamnicolem theretinalandperceivedlocusoffixationinthehumanvisualsystem
AT ratnamkavitha theretinalandperceivedlocusoffixationinthehumanvisualsystem
AT roordaaustin theretinalandperceivedlocusoffixationinthehumanvisualsystem
AT kilpelainenmarkku retinalandperceivedlocusoffixationinthehumanvisualsystem
AT putnamnicolem retinalandperceivedlocusoffixationinthehumanvisualsystem
AT ratnamkavitha retinalandperceivedlocusoffixationinthehumanvisualsystem
AT roordaaustin retinalandperceivedlocusoffixationinthehumanvisualsystem