Cargando…

Development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model

BACKGROUND: It is critical that junior residents be given opportunities to practise bowel anastomosis before performing the procedure in patients. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an affordable way to provide realistic, reusable intestinal simulators. The aim of this study was to test the face and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oxford, Katie, Walsh, Greg, Bungay, Jonathan, Quigley, Stephen, Dubrowski, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Joule Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018719
_version_ 1784585822575525888
author Oxford, Katie
Walsh, Greg
Bungay, Jonathan
Quigley, Stephen
Dubrowski, Adam
author_facet Oxford, Katie
Walsh, Greg
Bungay, Jonathan
Quigley, Stephen
Dubrowski, Adam
author_sort Oxford, Katie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is critical that junior residents be given opportunities to practise bowel anastomosis before performing the procedure in patients. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an affordable way to provide realistic, reusable intestinal simulators. The aim of this study was to test the face and content validity of a 3D-printed simulator for bowel anastomosis. METHODS: The bowel anastomosis simulator was designed and assembled with the use of desktop 3D printers and silicone solutions. The production cost ranges from $2.67 to $131, depending on which aspects of the model one prefers to include. We incorporated input from a general surgeon regarding design modifications to improve the realism of the model. Nine experts in general surgery (6 staff surgeons and 3 senior residents) were asked to perform an anastomosis with the model and then complete 2 surveys regarding face and content validity. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”). RESULTS: The overall average score for product quality was 3.58, indicating good face validity. The average score for realism (e.g., flexibility and texture of the model) was 3.77. The simulator was rated as being useful for training, with an overall average score of 3.98. In general, the participants agreed that the simulator would be a valuable addition to current simulation-based medical education (average score 4.11). They commented that the model would be improved by adding extra layers to simulate mucosa. CONCLUSION: Experts found the 3D-printed bowel anastomosis simulator to be an appropriate tool for the education of surgical residents, based on the model’s texture, appearance and ability to undergo an anastomosis. This model provides an affordable way for surgical residents to learn bowel anastomosis. Future research will focus on proving educational efficacy, effectiveness and transfer that can be adapted for laparoscopic anastomosis training, hand-sewing and stapling procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8526160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher CMA Joule Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85261602021-10-22 Development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model Oxford, Katie Walsh, Greg Bungay, Jonathan Quigley, Stephen Dubrowski, Adam Can J Surg Research BACKGROUND: It is critical that junior residents be given opportunities to practise bowel anastomosis before performing the procedure in patients. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an affordable way to provide realistic, reusable intestinal simulators. The aim of this study was to test the face and content validity of a 3D-printed simulator for bowel anastomosis. METHODS: The bowel anastomosis simulator was designed and assembled with the use of desktop 3D printers and silicone solutions. The production cost ranges from $2.67 to $131, depending on which aspects of the model one prefers to include. We incorporated input from a general surgeon regarding design modifications to improve the realism of the model. Nine experts in general surgery (6 staff surgeons and 3 senior residents) were asked to perform an anastomosis with the model and then complete 2 surveys regarding face and content validity. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”). RESULTS: The overall average score for product quality was 3.58, indicating good face validity. The average score for realism (e.g., flexibility and texture of the model) was 3.77. The simulator was rated as being useful for training, with an overall average score of 3.98. In general, the participants agreed that the simulator would be a valuable addition to current simulation-based medical education (average score 4.11). They commented that the model would be improved by adding extra layers to simulate mucosa. CONCLUSION: Experts found the 3D-printed bowel anastomosis simulator to be an appropriate tool for the education of surgical residents, based on the model’s texture, appearance and ability to undergo an anastomosis. This model provides an affordable way for surgical residents to learn bowel anastomosis. Future research will focus on proving educational efficacy, effectiveness and transfer that can be adapted for laparoscopic anastomosis training, hand-sewing and stapling procedures. CMA Joule Inc. 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8526160/ /pubmed/34580077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018719 Text en © 2021 CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Oxford, Katie
Walsh, Greg
Bungay, Jonathan
Quigley, Stephen
Dubrowski, Adam
Development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model
title Development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model
title_full Development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model
title_fullStr Development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model
title_full_unstemmed Development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model
title_short Development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model
title_sort development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018719
work_keys_str_mv AT oxfordkatie developmentmanufactureandinitialassessmentofvalidityofa3dimensionalprintedbowelanastomosissimulationtrainingmodel
AT walshgreg developmentmanufactureandinitialassessmentofvalidityofa3dimensionalprintedbowelanastomosissimulationtrainingmodel
AT bungayjonathan developmentmanufactureandinitialassessmentofvalidityofa3dimensionalprintedbowelanastomosissimulationtrainingmodel
AT quigleystephen developmentmanufactureandinitialassessmentofvalidityofa3dimensionalprintedbowelanastomosissimulationtrainingmodel
AT dubrowskiadam developmentmanufactureandinitialassessmentofvalidityofa3dimensionalprintedbowelanastomosissimulationtrainingmodel