Cargando…

Can simple Non-Invasive Fibrosis Models Determine Prognostic Indicators (Fibrosis and Treatment Response) of Primary Biliary Cholangitis?

OBJECTIVE: The fibrosis stage during diagnosis and the response to ursodeoxycholic acid in the 1(st) year of treatment are considered to be prognostic indicators in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Determining these indicators with non-invasive models can enable the risk of liver failure to be mon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sayar, Suleyman, Gokcen, Pinar, Aykut, Huseyin, Adali, Gupse, Doganay, Hamdi Levent, Ozdil, Kamil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712085
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2021.95825
_version_ 1784585836024561664
author Sayar, Suleyman
Gokcen, Pinar
Aykut, Huseyin
Adali, Gupse
Doganay, Hamdi Levent
Ozdil, Kamil
author_facet Sayar, Suleyman
Gokcen, Pinar
Aykut, Huseyin
Adali, Gupse
Doganay, Hamdi Levent
Ozdil, Kamil
author_sort Sayar, Suleyman
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The fibrosis stage during diagnosis and the response to ursodeoxycholic acid in the 1(st) year of treatment are considered to be prognostic indicators in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Determining these indicators with non-invasive models can enable the risk of liver failure to be monitored with continuous variables from the moment of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of non-invasive models for determining the prognostic indicators in patients with PBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients with PBC were screened retrospectively. Patients were divided into early (≤2) and advanced (≥3) fibrosis groups. In addition, treatment response status according to the Paris-II criteria and liver failure risk (LFR) according to the UK-PBC score were determined. The S-Index consisting of gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), platelets (PLT), and albumin, (S-index: 1000×GGT÷[PLT×Albumın2]), other non-invasive models were calculated. The diagnostic effectiveness of non-invasive indicators to determine the fibrosis stage, response to treatment, and low LFR was analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included in the study. The overall mean age at diagnosis was 49.6±13.6 years and 86.8% of the patients (n=46) were female. The S-Index was able to determine fibrosis stage, treatment responded, and patients with low LFR (AUC: 0.747, 0.823, and 0.752; p=0.006, <0.001, and 0.0007, respectively). Furthermore, S-Index found to superior to other non-invasive indicators in terms diagnosis of prognostic indicators of PBC. CONCLUSION: S-index is a practical and inexpensive non-invasive model that can identify liver fibrosis and treatment response in patients with PBC. It can be used as a continuous variable prognostic model in PBC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8526222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85262222021-10-27 Can simple Non-Invasive Fibrosis Models Determine Prognostic Indicators (Fibrosis and Treatment Response) of Primary Biliary Cholangitis? Sayar, Suleyman Gokcen, Pinar Aykut, Huseyin Adali, Gupse Doganay, Hamdi Levent Ozdil, Kamil Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul Original Research OBJECTIVE: The fibrosis stage during diagnosis and the response to ursodeoxycholic acid in the 1(st) year of treatment are considered to be prognostic indicators in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Determining these indicators with non-invasive models can enable the risk of liver failure to be monitored with continuous variables from the moment of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of non-invasive models for determining the prognostic indicators in patients with PBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients with PBC were screened retrospectively. Patients were divided into early (≤2) and advanced (≥3) fibrosis groups. In addition, treatment response status according to the Paris-II criteria and liver failure risk (LFR) according to the UK-PBC score were determined. The S-Index consisting of gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), platelets (PLT), and albumin, (S-index: 1000×GGT÷[PLT×Albumın2]), other non-invasive models were calculated. The diagnostic effectiveness of non-invasive indicators to determine the fibrosis stage, response to treatment, and low LFR was analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included in the study. The overall mean age at diagnosis was 49.6±13.6 years and 86.8% of the patients (n=46) were female. The S-Index was able to determine fibrosis stage, treatment responded, and patients with low LFR (AUC: 0.747, 0.823, and 0.752; p=0.006, <0.001, and 0.0007, respectively). Furthermore, S-Index found to superior to other non-invasive indicators in terms diagnosis of prognostic indicators of PBC. CONCLUSION: S-index is a practical and inexpensive non-invasive model that can identify liver fibrosis and treatment response in patients with PBC. It can be used as a continuous variable prognostic model in PBC. Kare Publishing 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8526222/ /pubmed/34712085 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2021.95825 Text en Copyright: © 2021 by The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Original Research
Sayar, Suleyman
Gokcen, Pinar
Aykut, Huseyin
Adali, Gupse
Doganay, Hamdi Levent
Ozdil, Kamil
Can simple Non-Invasive Fibrosis Models Determine Prognostic Indicators (Fibrosis and Treatment Response) of Primary Biliary Cholangitis?
title Can simple Non-Invasive Fibrosis Models Determine Prognostic Indicators (Fibrosis and Treatment Response) of Primary Biliary Cholangitis?
title_full Can simple Non-Invasive Fibrosis Models Determine Prognostic Indicators (Fibrosis and Treatment Response) of Primary Biliary Cholangitis?
title_fullStr Can simple Non-Invasive Fibrosis Models Determine Prognostic Indicators (Fibrosis and Treatment Response) of Primary Biliary Cholangitis?
title_full_unstemmed Can simple Non-Invasive Fibrosis Models Determine Prognostic Indicators (Fibrosis and Treatment Response) of Primary Biliary Cholangitis?
title_short Can simple Non-Invasive Fibrosis Models Determine Prognostic Indicators (Fibrosis and Treatment Response) of Primary Biliary Cholangitis?
title_sort can simple non-invasive fibrosis models determine prognostic indicators (fibrosis and treatment response) of primary biliary cholangitis?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712085
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2021.95825
work_keys_str_mv AT sayarsuleyman cansimplenoninvasivefibrosismodelsdetermineprognosticindicatorsfibrosisandtreatmentresponseofprimarybiliarycholangitis
AT gokcenpinar cansimplenoninvasivefibrosismodelsdetermineprognosticindicatorsfibrosisandtreatmentresponseofprimarybiliarycholangitis
AT aykuthuseyin cansimplenoninvasivefibrosismodelsdetermineprognosticindicatorsfibrosisandtreatmentresponseofprimarybiliarycholangitis
AT adaligupse cansimplenoninvasivefibrosismodelsdetermineprognosticindicatorsfibrosisandtreatmentresponseofprimarybiliarycholangitis
AT doganayhamdilevent cansimplenoninvasivefibrosismodelsdetermineprognosticindicatorsfibrosisandtreatmentresponseofprimarybiliarycholangitis
AT ozdilkamil cansimplenoninvasivefibrosismodelsdetermineprognosticindicatorsfibrosisandtreatmentresponseofprimarybiliarycholangitis