Cargando…
Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is a major cause of sight loss worldwide, with the highest regional prevalence and incidence reported in Africa. The most common low-cost treatment used to control glaucoma is long-term timolol eye drops. However, low adherence is a major challenge. We aimed to investigate wheth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34655547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00348-X |
_version_ | 1784585859317628928 |
---|---|
author | Philippin, Heiko Matayan, Einoti Knoll, Karin M Macha, Edith Mbishi, Sia Makupa, Andrew Matsinhe, Cristóvão da Gama, Vasco Monjane, Mario Ncheda, Awum Joyce Mulobuana, Francisco Alcides Muna, Elisante Fopoussi, Nelly Gazzard, Gus Marques, Ana Patricia Shah, Peter Macleod, David Makupa, William U Burton, Matthew J |
author_facet | Philippin, Heiko Matayan, Einoti Knoll, Karin M Macha, Edith Mbishi, Sia Makupa, Andrew Matsinhe, Cristóvão da Gama, Vasco Monjane, Mario Ncheda, Awum Joyce Mulobuana, Francisco Alcides Muna, Elisante Fopoussi, Nelly Gazzard, Gus Marques, Ana Patricia Shah, Peter Macleod, David Makupa, William U Burton, Matthew J |
author_sort | Philippin, Heiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is a major cause of sight loss worldwide, with the highest regional prevalence and incidence reported in Africa. The most common low-cost treatment used to control glaucoma is long-term timolol eye drops. However, low adherence is a major challenge. We aimed to investigate whether selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) was superior to timolol eye drops for controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: We did a two-arm, parallel-group, single-masked randomised controlled trial at the Eye Department of Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) had open-angle glaucoma and an IOP above 21 mm Hg, and did not have asthma or a history of glaucoma surgery or laser. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 0·5% timolol eye drops to administer twice daily or to receive SLT. The primary outcome was the proportion of eyes from both groups with treatment success, defined as an IOP below or equal to target pressure according to glaucoma severity, at 12 months following randomisation. Re-explanation of eye drop application or a repeat SLT was permitted once. The primary analysis was by modified intention-to-treat, excluding participants lost to follow-up, using logistic regression; generalised estimating equations were used to adjust for the correlation between eyes. This trial was registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201508001235339. FINDINGS: 840 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 201 (24%) participants (382 eligible eyes) were enrolled between Aug 31, 2015, and May 12, 2017. 100 (50%) participants (191 eyes) were randomly assigned to the timolol group and 101 (50%; 191 eyes) to the SLT group. After 1 year, 339 (89%) of 382 eyes were analysed. Treatment was successful in 55 (31%) of 176 eyes in the timolol group (16 [29%] of 55 eyes required repeat administration counselling) and in 99 (61%) of 163 eyes in the SLT group (33 [33%] of 99 eyes required repeat SLT; odds ratio 3·37 [95% CI 1·96–5·80]; p<0·0001). Adverse events (mostly unrelated to ocular events) occurred in ten (10%) participants in the timolol group and in eight (8%) participants in the SLT group (p=0·61). INTERPRETATION: SLT was superior to timolol eye drops for managing patients with open-angle high-pressure glaucoma for 1 year in Tanzania. SLT has the potential to transform the management of glaucoma in sub-Saharan Africa, even where the prevalence of advanced glaucoma is high. FUNDING: Christian Blind Mission, Seeing is Believing Innovation Fund, and the Wellcome Trust. TRANSLATIONS: For the Kiswahili, French and Portuguese translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8526362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85263622021-10-25 Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial Philippin, Heiko Matayan, Einoti Knoll, Karin M Macha, Edith Mbishi, Sia Makupa, Andrew Matsinhe, Cristóvão da Gama, Vasco Monjane, Mario Ncheda, Awum Joyce Mulobuana, Francisco Alcides Muna, Elisante Fopoussi, Nelly Gazzard, Gus Marques, Ana Patricia Shah, Peter Macleod, David Makupa, William U Burton, Matthew J Lancet Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is a major cause of sight loss worldwide, with the highest regional prevalence and incidence reported in Africa. The most common low-cost treatment used to control glaucoma is long-term timolol eye drops. However, low adherence is a major challenge. We aimed to investigate whether selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) was superior to timolol eye drops for controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: We did a two-arm, parallel-group, single-masked randomised controlled trial at the Eye Department of Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) had open-angle glaucoma and an IOP above 21 mm Hg, and did not have asthma or a history of glaucoma surgery or laser. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 0·5% timolol eye drops to administer twice daily or to receive SLT. The primary outcome was the proportion of eyes from both groups with treatment success, defined as an IOP below or equal to target pressure according to glaucoma severity, at 12 months following randomisation. Re-explanation of eye drop application or a repeat SLT was permitted once. The primary analysis was by modified intention-to-treat, excluding participants lost to follow-up, using logistic regression; generalised estimating equations were used to adjust for the correlation between eyes. This trial was registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201508001235339. FINDINGS: 840 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 201 (24%) participants (382 eligible eyes) were enrolled between Aug 31, 2015, and May 12, 2017. 100 (50%) participants (191 eyes) were randomly assigned to the timolol group and 101 (50%; 191 eyes) to the SLT group. After 1 year, 339 (89%) of 382 eyes were analysed. Treatment was successful in 55 (31%) of 176 eyes in the timolol group (16 [29%] of 55 eyes required repeat administration counselling) and in 99 (61%) of 163 eyes in the SLT group (33 [33%] of 99 eyes required repeat SLT; odds ratio 3·37 [95% CI 1·96–5·80]; p<0·0001). Adverse events (mostly unrelated to ocular events) occurred in ten (10%) participants in the timolol group and in eight (8%) participants in the SLT group (p=0·61). INTERPRETATION: SLT was superior to timolol eye drops for managing patients with open-angle high-pressure glaucoma for 1 year in Tanzania. SLT has the potential to transform the management of glaucoma in sub-Saharan Africa, even where the prevalence of advanced glaucoma is high. FUNDING: Christian Blind Mission, Seeing is Believing Innovation Fund, and the Wellcome Trust. TRANSLATIONS: For the Kiswahili, French and Portuguese translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section. Elsevier Ltd 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8526362/ /pubmed/34655547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00348-X Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Philippin, Heiko Matayan, Einoti Knoll, Karin M Macha, Edith Mbishi, Sia Makupa, Andrew Matsinhe, Cristóvão da Gama, Vasco Monjane, Mario Ncheda, Awum Joyce Mulobuana, Francisco Alcides Muna, Elisante Fopoussi, Nelly Gazzard, Gus Marques, Ana Patricia Shah, Peter Macleod, David Makupa, William U Burton, Matthew J Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial |
title | Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in tanzania: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34655547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00348-X |
work_keys_str_mv | AT philippinheiko selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT matayaneinoti selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT knollkarinm selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT machaedith selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mbishisia selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT makupaandrew selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT matsinhecristovao selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dagamavasco selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT monjanemario selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nchedaawumjoyce selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mulobuanafranciscoalcides selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT munaelisante selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fopoussinelly selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gazzardgus selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marquesanapatricia selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT shahpeter selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT macleoddavid selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT makupawilliamu selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT burtonmatthewj selectivelasertrabeculoplastyversus05timololeyedropsforthetreatmentofglaucomaintanzaniaarandomisedcontrolledtrial |