Cargando…

The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery

BACKGROUND: The role of radiation therapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. Trials have not identified a low-risk cohort, based on clinicopathologic features, who do not benefit from RT. A biosignature (DCISionRT(®)) that evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Chirag, Bremer, Troy, Cox, Charles, Whitworth, Pat, Patel, Rakesh, Patel, Anushka, Brown, Eric, Gold, Linsey, Rock, David, Riley, Lee, Kesslering, Christy, Brown, Sheree, Gabordi, Robert, Pellicane, James, Rabinovich, Rachel, Khan, Sadia, Templeton, Sandra, Majithia, Lonika, Willey, Shawna C., Wärnberg, Fredrik, Gerber, Naamit K., Shivers, Steve, Vicini, Frank A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33821346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09903-1
_version_ 1784585874524078080
author Shah, Chirag
Bremer, Troy
Cox, Charles
Whitworth, Pat
Patel, Rakesh
Patel, Anushka
Brown, Eric
Gold, Linsey
Rock, David
Riley, Lee
Kesslering, Christy
Brown, Sheree
Gabordi, Robert
Pellicane, James
Rabinovich, Rachel
Khan, Sadia
Templeton, Sandra
Majithia, Lonika
Willey, Shawna C.
Wärnberg, Fredrik
Gerber, Naamit K.
Shivers, Steve
Vicini, Frank A.
author_facet Shah, Chirag
Bremer, Troy
Cox, Charles
Whitworth, Pat
Patel, Rakesh
Patel, Anushka
Brown, Eric
Gold, Linsey
Rock, David
Riley, Lee
Kesslering, Christy
Brown, Sheree
Gabordi, Robert
Pellicane, James
Rabinovich, Rachel
Khan, Sadia
Templeton, Sandra
Majithia, Lonika
Willey, Shawna C.
Wärnberg, Fredrik
Gerber, Naamit K.
Shivers, Steve
Vicini, Frank A.
author_sort Shah, Chirag
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of radiation therapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. Trials have not identified a low-risk cohort, based on clinicopathologic features, who do not benefit from RT. A biosignature (DCISionRT(®)) that evaluates recurrence risk has been developed and validated. We evaluated the impact of DCISionRT on clinicians’ recommendations for adjuvant RT. METHODS: The PREDICT study is a prospective, multi-institutional, observational registry in which patients underwent DCISionRT testing. The primary endpoint was to identify the percentage of patients where testing led to a change in RT recommendations. RESULTS: Overall, 539 women were included in this study. Pre DCISionRT testing, RT was recommended to 69% of patients; however, post-testing, a change in the RT recommendation was made for 42% of patients compared with the pre-testing recommendation; the percentage of women who were recommended RT decreased by 20%. For women initially recommended not to receive an RT pre-test, 35% had their recommendation changed to add RT following testing, while post-test, 46% of patients had their recommendation changed to omit RT after an initial recommendation for RT. When considered in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors, the elevated DCISionRT score risk group (DS > 3) had the strongest association with an RT recommendation (odds ratio 43.4) compared with age, grade, size, margin status, and other factors. CONCLUSIONS: DCISionRT provided information that significantly changed the recommendations to add or omit RT. Compared with traditional clinicopathologic features used to determine recommendations for or against RT, the factor most strongly associated with RT recommendations was the DCISionRT result, with other factors of importance being patient preference, tumor size, and grade. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09903-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8526470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85264702021-11-04 The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery Shah, Chirag Bremer, Troy Cox, Charles Whitworth, Pat Patel, Rakesh Patel, Anushka Brown, Eric Gold, Linsey Rock, David Riley, Lee Kesslering, Christy Brown, Sheree Gabordi, Robert Pellicane, James Rabinovich, Rachel Khan, Sadia Templeton, Sandra Majithia, Lonika Willey, Shawna C. Wärnberg, Fredrik Gerber, Naamit K. Shivers, Steve Vicini, Frank A. Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: The role of radiation therapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. Trials have not identified a low-risk cohort, based on clinicopathologic features, who do not benefit from RT. A biosignature (DCISionRT(®)) that evaluates recurrence risk has been developed and validated. We evaluated the impact of DCISionRT on clinicians’ recommendations for adjuvant RT. METHODS: The PREDICT study is a prospective, multi-institutional, observational registry in which patients underwent DCISionRT testing. The primary endpoint was to identify the percentage of patients where testing led to a change in RT recommendations. RESULTS: Overall, 539 women were included in this study. Pre DCISionRT testing, RT was recommended to 69% of patients; however, post-testing, a change in the RT recommendation was made for 42% of patients compared with the pre-testing recommendation; the percentage of women who were recommended RT decreased by 20%. For women initially recommended not to receive an RT pre-test, 35% had their recommendation changed to add RT following testing, while post-test, 46% of patients had their recommendation changed to omit RT after an initial recommendation for RT. When considered in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors, the elevated DCISionRT score risk group (DS > 3) had the strongest association with an RT recommendation (odds ratio 43.4) compared with age, grade, size, margin status, and other factors. CONCLUSIONS: DCISionRT provided information that significantly changed the recommendations to add or omit RT. Compared with traditional clinicopathologic features used to determine recommendations for or against RT, the factor most strongly associated with RT recommendations was the DCISionRT result, with other factors of importance being patient preference, tumor size, and grade. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09903-1. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8526470/ /pubmed/33821346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09903-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/The article is forthwith distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Shah, Chirag
Bremer, Troy
Cox, Charles
Whitworth, Pat
Patel, Rakesh
Patel, Anushka
Brown, Eric
Gold, Linsey
Rock, David
Riley, Lee
Kesslering, Christy
Brown, Sheree
Gabordi, Robert
Pellicane, James
Rabinovich, Rachel
Khan, Sadia
Templeton, Sandra
Majithia, Lonika
Willey, Shawna C.
Wärnberg, Fredrik
Gerber, Naamit K.
Shivers, Steve
Vicini, Frank A.
The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery
title The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery
title_full The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery
title_fullStr The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery
title_short The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery
title_sort clinical utility of dcisionrt(®) on radiation therapy decision making in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ following breast-conserving surgery
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33821346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09903-1
work_keys_str_mv AT shahchirag theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT bremertroy theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT coxcharles theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT whitworthpat theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT patelrakesh theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT patelanushka theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT browneric theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT goldlinsey theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT rockdavid theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT rileylee theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT kessleringchristy theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT brownsheree theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT gabordirobert theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT pellicanejames theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT rabinovichrachel theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT khansadia theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT templetonsandra theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT majithialonika theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT willeyshawnac theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT warnbergfredrik theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT gerbernaamitk theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT shiverssteve theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT vicinifranka theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT shahchirag clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT bremertroy clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT coxcharles clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT whitworthpat clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT patelrakesh clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT patelanushka clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT browneric clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT goldlinsey clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT rockdavid clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT rileylee clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT kessleringchristy clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT brownsheree clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT gabordirobert clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT pellicanejames clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT rabinovichrachel clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT khansadia clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT templetonsandra clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT majithialonika clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT willeyshawnac clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT warnbergfredrik clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT gerbernaamitk clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT shiverssteve clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery
AT vicinifranka clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery