Cargando…
The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery
BACKGROUND: The role of radiation therapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. Trials have not identified a low-risk cohort, based on clinicopathologic features, who do not benefit from RT. A biosignature (DCISionRT(®)) that evaluat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33821346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09903-1 |
_version_ | 1784585874524078080 |
---|---|
author | Shah, Chirag Bremer, Troy Cox, Charles Whitworth, Pat Patel, Rakesh Patel, Anushka Brown, Eric Gold, Linsey Rock, David Riley, Lee Kesslering, Christy Brown, Sheree Gabordi, Robert Pellicane, James Rabinovich, Rachel Khan, Sadia Templeton, Sandra Majithia, Lonika Willey, Shawna C. Wärnberg, Fredrik Gerber, Naamit K. Shivers, Steve Vicini, Frank A. |
author_facet | Shah, Chirag Bremer, Troy Cox, Charles Whitworth, Pat Patel, Rakesh Patel, Anushka Brown, Eric Gold, Linsey Rock, David Riley, Lee Kesslering, Christy Brown, Sheree Gabordi, Robert Pellicane, James Rabinovich, Rachel Khan, Sadia Templeton, Sandra Majithia, Lonika Willey, Shawna C. Wärnberg, Fredrik Gerber, Naamit K. Shivers, Steve Vicini, Frank A. |
author_sort | Shah, Chirag |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The role of radiation therapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. Trials have not identified a low-risk cohort, based on clinicopathologic features, who do not benefit from RT. A biosignature (DCISionRT(®)) that evaluates recurrence risk has been developed and validated. We evaluated the impact of DCISionRT on clinicians’ recommendations for adjuvant RT. METHODS: The PREDICT study is a prospective, multi-institutional, observational registry in which patients underwent DCISionRT testing. The primary endpoint was to identify the percentage of patients where testing led to a change in RT recommendations. RESULTS: Overall, 539 women were included in this study. Pre DCISionRT testing, RT was recommended to 69% of patients; however, post-testing, a change in the RT recommendation was made for 42% of patients compared with the pre-testing recommendation; the percentage of women who were recommended RT decreased by 20%. For women initially recommended not to receive an RT pre-test, 35% had their recommendation changed to add RT following testing, while post-test, 46% of patients had their recommendation changed to omit RT after an initial recommendation for RT. When considered in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors, the elevated DCISionRT score risk group (DS > 3) had the strongest association with an RT recommendation (odds ratio 43.4) compared with age, grade, size, margin status, and other factors. CONCLUSIONS: DCISionRT provided information that significantly changed the recommendations to add or omit RT. Compared with traditional clinicopathologic features used to determine recommendations for or against RT, the factor most strongly associated with RT recommendations was the DCISionRT result, with other factors of importance being patient preference, tumor size, and grade. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09903-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8526470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85264702021-11-04 The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery Shah, Chirag Bremer, Troy Cox, Charles Whitworth, Pat Patel, Rakesh Patel, Anushka Brown, Eric Gold, Linsey Rock, David Riley, Lee Kesslering, Christy Brown, Sheree Gabordi, Robert Pellicane, James Rabinovich, Rachel Khan, Sadia Templeton, Sandra Majithia, Lonika Willey, Shawna C. Wärnberg, Fredrik Gerber, Naamit K. Shivers, Steve Vicini, Frank A. Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: The role of radiation therapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. Trials have not identified a low-risk cohort, based on clinicopathologic features, who do not benefit from RT. A biosignature (DCISionRT(®)) that evaluates recurrence risk has been developed and validated. We evaluated the impact of DCISionRT on clinicians’ recommendations for adjuvant RT. METHODS: The PREDICT study is a prospective, multi-institutional, observational registry in which patients underwent DCISionRT testing. The primary endpoint was to identify the percentage of patients where testing led to a change in RT recommendations. RESULTS: Overall, 539 women were included in this study. Pre DCISionRT testing, RT was recommended to 69% of patients; however, post-testing, a change in the RT recommendation was made for 42% of patients compared with the pre-testing recommendation; the percentage of women who were recommended RT decreased by 20%. For women initially recommended not to receive an RT pre-test, 35% had their recommendation changed to add RT following testing, while post-test, 46% of patients had their recommendation changed to omit RT after an initial recommendation for RT. When considered in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors, the elevated DCISionRT score risk group (DS > 3) had the strongest association with an RT recommendation (odds ratio 43.4) compared with age, grade, size, margin status, and other factors. CONCLUSIONS: DCISionRT provided information that significantly changed the recommendations to add or omit RT. Compared with traditional clinicopathologic features used to determine recommendations for or against RT, the factor most strongly associated with RT recommendations was the DCISionRT result, with other factors of importance being patient preference, tumor size, and grade. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09903-1. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8526470/ /pubmed/33821346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09903-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/The article is forthwith distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Breast Oncology Shah, Chirag Bremer, Troy Cox, Charles Whitworth, Pat Patel, Rakesh Patel, Anushka Brown, Eric Gold, Linsey Rock, David Riley, Lee Kesslering, Christy Brown, Sheree Gabordi, Robert Pellicane, James Rabinovich, Rachel Khan, Sadia Templeton, Sandra Majithia, Lonika Willey, Shawna C. Wärnberg, Fredrik Gerber, Naamit K. Shivers, Steve Vicini, Frank A. The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery |
title | The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery |
title_full | The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery |
title_fullStr | The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery |
title_short | The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT(®) on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery |
title_sort | clinical utility of dcisionrt(®) on radiation therapy decision making in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ following breast-conserving surgery |
topic | Breast Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33821346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09903-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahchirag theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT bremertroy theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT coxcharles theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT whitworthpat theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT patelrakesh theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT patelanushka theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT browneric theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT goldlinsey theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT rockdavid theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT rileylee theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT kessleringchristy theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT brownsheree theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT gabordirobert theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT pellicanejames theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT rabinovichrachel theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT khansadia theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT templetonsandra theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT majithialonika theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT willeyshawnac theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT warnbergfredrik theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT gerbernaamitk theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT shiverssteve theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT vicinifranka theclinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT shahchirag clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT bremertroy clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT coxcharles clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT whitworthpat clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT patelrakesh clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT patelanushka clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT browneric clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT goldlinsey clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT rockdavid clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT rileylee clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT kessleringchristy clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT brownsheree clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT gabordirobert clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT pellicanejames clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT rabinovichrachel clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT khansadia clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT templetonsandra clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT majithialonika clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT willeyshawnac clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT warnbergfredrik clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT gerbernaamitk clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT shiverssteve clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery AT vicinifranka clinicalutilityofdcisionrtonradiationtherapydecisionmakinginpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitufollowingbreastconservingsurgery |