Cargando…

Evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study

OBJECTIVE: Work-related activities can be a risk factor for pregnancy complications such as preterm birth. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a blended care programme, Pregnancy and Work, that provides pregnant workers and their obstetrical caregivers with advice on work adjustment. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Beukering, Monique, Velu, Adeline, Schonewille, Lydia Henrike Nicole, Duijnhoven, Ruben, Mol, Ben Willem, Brand, Teus, Frings-Dresen, Monique, Kok, Marjolein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-107191
_version_ 1784585956974657536
author van Beukering, Monique
Velu, Adeline
Schonewille, Lydia Henrike Nicole
Duijnhoven, Ruben
Mol, Ben Willem
Brand, Teus
Frings-Dresen, Monique
Kok, Marjolein
author_facet van Beukering, Monique
Velu, Adeline
Schonewille, Lydia Henrike Nicole
Duijnhoven, Ruben
Mol, Ben Willem
Brand, Teus
Frings-Dresen, Monique
Kok, Marjolein
author_sort van Beukering, Monique
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Work-related activities can be a risk factor for pregnancy complications such as preterm birth. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a blended care programme, Pregnancy and Work, that provides pregnant workers and their obstetrical caregivers with advice on work adjustment. METHODS: Women less than 20 weeks of gestation, in paid employment or self-employed, in the care of four participating hospitals and their referring midwifery practices in the Netherlands received either the blended care programme (n=119), consisting of a training for professionals and a mobile health application, or care as usual (n=122) in a controlled intervention study with a follow-up in intervention and control populations. All participants completed three questionnaires concerning health and working conditions at 16, 24 and 32 weeks of pregnancy. Primary outcome was the percentage of women who received advice from their obstetrical caregiver about work adjustment. Secondary outcomes were work status, realised work adjustment and working conditions. Groups were compared using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 188 (78%) completed all three questionnaires. In the blended care group, women received more advice from obstetrical caregivers to adjust their work than in the control group, 41 (39%) vs 21 (18%) (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 2.2, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.4), but less from their employer 8 (8%) vs 31 (28%) (aRR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.61). There were no significant differences in realised work adjustments. At 24 weeks, 30% of the pregnant women in both groups continued to work in hazardous workplaces. CONCLUSION: Among working pregnant women, the blended care intervention increases advice on work adjustment given by midwives and obstetricians, but does not lead to more work adjustments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8526877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85268772021-11-04 Evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study van Beukering, Monique Velu, Adeline Schonewille, Lydia Henrike Nicole Duijnhoven, Ruben Mol, Ben Willem Brand, Teus Frings-Dresen, Monique Kok, Marjolein Occup Environ Med Workplace OBJECTIVE: Work-related activities can be a risk factor for pregnancy complications such as preterm birth. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a blended care programme, Pregnancy and Work, that provides pregnant workers and their obstetrical caregivers with advice on work adjustment. METHODS: Women less than 20 weeks of gestation, in paid employment or self-employed, in the care of four participating hospitals and their referring midwifery practices in the Netherlands received either the blended care programme (n=119), consisting of a training for professionals and a mobile health application, or care as usual (n=122) in a controlled intervention study with a follow-up in intervention and control populations. All participants completed three questionnaires concerning health and working conditions at 16, 24 and 32 weeks of pregnancy. Primary outcome was the percentage of women who received advice from their obstetrical caregiver about work adjustment. Secondary outcomes were work status, realised work adjustment and working conditions. Groups were compared using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 188 (78%) completed all three questionnaires. In the blended care group, women received more advice from obstetrical caregivers to adjust their work than in the control group, 41 (39%) vs 21 (18%) (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 2.2, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.4), but less from their employer 8 (8%) vs 31 (28%) (aRR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.61). There were no significant differences in realised work adjustments. At 24 weeks, 30% of the pregnant women in both groups continued to work in hazardous workplaces. CONCLUSION: Among working pregnant women, the blended care intervention increases advice on work adjustment given by midwives and obstetricians, but does not lead to more work adjustments. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8526877/ /pubmed/33875554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-107191 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Workplace
van Beukering, Monique
Velu, Adeline
Schonewille, Lydia Henrike Nicole
Duijnhoven, Ruben
Mol, Ben Willem
Brand, Teus
Frings-Dresen, Monique
Kok, Marjolein
Evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study
title Evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study
title_full Evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study
title_short Evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study
title_sort evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study
topic Workplace
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-107191
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbeukeringmonique evaluationofablendedcareprogrammeforcaregiversandworkingpregnantwomentopreventadversepregnancyoutcomesaninterventionstudy
AT veluadeline evaluationofablendedcareprogrammeforcaregiversandworkingpregnantwomentopreventadversepregnancyoutcomesaninterventionstudy
AT schonewillelydiahenrikenicole evaluationofablendedcareprogrammeforcaregiversandworkingpregnantwomentopreventadversepregnancyoutcomesaninterventionstudy
AT duijnhovenruben evaluationofablendedcareprogrammeforcaregiversandworkingpregnantwomentopreventadversepregnancyoutcomesaninterventionstudy
AT molbenwillem evaluationofablendedcareprogrammeforcaregiversandworkingpregnantwomentopreventadversepregnancyoutcomesaninterventionstudy
AT brandteus evaluationofablendedcareprogrammeforcaregiversandworkingpregnantwomentopreventadversepregnancyoutcomesaninterventionstudy
AT fringsdresenmonique evaluationofablendedcareprogrammeforcaregiversandworkingpregnantwomentopreventadversepregnancyoutcomesaninterventionstudy
AT kokmarjolein evaluationofablendedcareprogrammeforcaregiversandworkingpregnantwomentopreventadversepregnancyoutcomesaninterventionstudy