Cargando…

Preferences in a Group of Patients with Cancer: A Grounded Theory

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to understand the preferences of patients with cancer in Medellin, Colombia. METHODS: A qualitative approach based on the theoretical and methodological resources of the grounded theory was conducted. Between June 2020 and March 2021, patients over 18 years old with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Higuita-Gutiérrez, Luis Felipe, Estrada-Mesa, Diego Alejandro, Cardona-Arias, Jaiberth Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703214
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S328971
_version_ 1784585973608218624
author Higuita-Gutiérrez, Luis Felipe
Estrada-Mesa, Diego Alejandro
Cardona-Arias, Jaiberth Antonio
author_facet Higuita-Gutiérrez, Luis Felipe
Estrada-Mesa, Diego Alejandro
Cardona-Arias, Jaiberth Antonio
author_sort Higuita-Gutiérrez, Luis Felipe
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was conducted to understand the preferences of patients with cancer in Medellin, Colombia. METHODS: A qualitative approach based on the theoretical and methodological resources of the grounded theory was conducted. Between June 2020 and March 2021, patients over 18 years old with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer within the past 2 years treated in Medellin, Colombia, were selected. Theoretical saturation sampling was performed. Each participant was interviewed between 2 and 3 times in accordance with the open, axial, and selective coding of the grounded theory. RESULTS: A common preference set emerged in all patients related to the attributes of healthcare professionals and is a category that unites their scientific and humanistic aspects. On the other hand, very heterogeneous preferences were presented that were associated with the doctor–patient relationship and the therapeutic objectives. In the doctor–patient relationship, there are those who adhere to a paternalistic model and those who opt for an informative model. In therapeutic objectives, two subcategories emerged: those who are inclined to preserve life and those who accord more value to the quality of life. CONCLUSION: The categories that emerged illustrate the complexity and challenges of the preferences of patients with cancer in theoretical and experiential terms for social studies of medicine, philosophy, and bioethics. From medical social studies, it’s emphasized that the experiences of dehumanization are constant, which generates shared preferences in the patients related to the ideal of the medical professional. From the philosophical perspective, the care received by patients coincides with what was called medicine for slaves in ancient Greece, insofar as patients are not assumed to be free subjects. With respect to bioethics, some ideas are raised contrary to the support of individual autonomy; relational autonomy and the respect for the person above the autonomy itself are advocated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8526945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85269452021-10-25 Preferences in a Group of Patients with Cancer: A Grounded Theory Higuita-Gutiérrez, Luis Felipe Estrada-Mesa, Diego Alejandro Cardona-Arias, Jaiberth Antonio Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research PURPOSE: This study was conducted to understand the preferences of patients with cancer in Medellin, Colombia. METHODS: A qualitative approach based on the theoretical and methodological resources of the grounded theory was conducted. Between June 2020 and March 2021, patients over 18 years old with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer within the past 2 years treated in Medellin, Colombia, were selected. Theoretical saturation sampling was performed. Each participant was interviewed between 2 and 3 times in accordance with the open, axial, and selective coding of the grounded theory. RESULTS: A common preference set emerged in all patients related to the attributes of healthcare professionals and is a category that unites their scientific and humanistic aspects. On the other hand, very heterogeneous preferences were presented that were associated with the doctor–patient relationship and the therapeutic objectives. In the doctor–patient relationship, there are those who adhere to a paternalistic model and those who opt for an informative model. In therapeutic objectives, two subcategories emerged: those who are inclined to preserve life and those who accord more value to the quality of life. CONCLUSION: The categories that emerged illustrate the complexity and challenges of the preferences of patients with cancer in theoretical and experiential terms for social studies of medicine, philosophy, and bioethics. From medical social studies, it’s emphasized that the experiences of dehumanization are constant, which generates shared preferences in the patients related to the ideal of the medical professional. From the philosophical perspective, the care received by patients coincides with what was called medicine for slaves in ancient Greece, insofar as patients are not assumed to be free subjects. With respect to bioethics, some ideas are raised contrary to the support of individual autonomy; relational autonomy and the respect for the person above the autonomy itself are advocated. Dove 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8526945/ /pubmed/34703214 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S328971 Text en © 2021 Higuita-Gutiérrez et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Higuita-Gutiérrez, Luis Felipe
Estrada-Mesa, Diego Alejandro
Cardona-Arias, Jaiberth Antonio
Preferences in a Group of Patients with Cancer: A Grounded Theory
title Preferences in a Group of Patients with Cancer: A Grounded Theory
title_full Preferences in a Group of Patients with Cancer: A Grounded Theory
title_fullStr Preferences in a Group of Patients with Cancer: A Grounded Theory
title_full_unstemmed Preferences in a Group of Patients with Cancer: A Grounded Theory
title_short Preferences in a Group of Patients with Cancer: A Grounded Theory
title_sort preferences in a group of patients with cancer: a grounded theory
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703214
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S328971
work_keys_str_mv AT higuitagutierrezluisfelipe preferencesinagroupofpatientswithcanceragroundedtheory
AT estradamesadiegoalejandro preferencesinagroupofpatientswithcanceragroundedtheory
AT cardonaariasjaiberthantonio preferencesinagroupofpatientswithcanceragroundedtheory