Cargando…
Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China
OBJECTIVES: It is to explore the perceived financial risk protection effect of the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme (URRBMI) and its influencing factors to provide evidence to further improve the URRBMI. DESIGN: It is a cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047699 |
_version_ | 1784586022052429824 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Huan Zhao, Miaomiao Tian, Guomei Zhao, Zihua Ding, Ding Yin, Mei |
author_facet | Jiang, Huan Zhao, Miaomiao Tian, Guomei Zhao, Zihua Ding, Ding Yin, Mei |
author_sort | Jiang, Huan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: It is to explore the perceived financial risk protection effect of the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme (URRBMI) and its influencing factors to provide evidence to further improve the URRBMI. DESIGN: It is a cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods study is conducted in five provinces in rural China. Through stratified cluster random sampling, 1681 rural residents participate in a cross-sectional questionnaire survey (1657 valid questionnaires are retrieved). Thirty rural residents participate in in-depth interviews. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: A multivariate logistic regression analysis is adopted to identify factors influencing respondents’ perceptions. Semistructured interviews are used to identify the reasons why some respondents believed the URRBMI to be ineffective. RESULTS: Overall, 77.5% of respondents believe that the URRBMI is effective. Respondents, who are older, have a higher household income, prefer primary health facilities and provide a higher rating for critical illness compensation and maximum compensatory payouts. They are more likely to give the URRBMI a higher effectiveness rating than their counterparts. Qualitatively, participants who believe the URRBMI to be ineffective list the following reasons: low outpatient service coverage, insufficient or undersupplied drugs and services in the insurance list, problems in the arrangement of deductibles and maximum compensatory payouts, provider-induced behaviour and increased healthcare service price. CONCLUSIONS: This exploration focuses on the reasons why rural residents think the scheme is invalid, which are vital for policy reform. Policies should focus on benefits design and coverage, the assumption of a supervisory role, avoiding financial risk stemming from critical illness and cross-sectoral actions to strengthen the primary healthcare system and comprehensive social security wealth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8527163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85271632021-11-04 Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China Jiang, Huan Zhao, Miaomiao Tian, Guomei Zhao, Zihua Ding, Ding Yin, Mei BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: It is to explore the perceived financial risk protection effect of the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme (URRBMI) and its influencing factors to provide evidence to further improve the URRBMI. DESIGN: It is a cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods study is conducted in five provinces in rural China. Through stratified cluster random sampling, 1681 rural residents participate in a cross-sectional questionnaire survey (1657 valid questionnaires are retrieved). Thirty rural residents participate in in-depth interviews. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: A multivariate logistic regression analysis is adopted to identify factors influencing respondents’ perceptions. Semistructured interviews are used to identify the reasons why some respondents believed the URRBMI to be ineffective. RESULTS: Overall, 77.5% of respondents believe that the URRBMI is effective. Respondents, who are older, have a higher household income, prefer primary health facilities and provide a higher rating for critical illness compensation and maximum compensatory payouts. They are more likely to give the URRBMI a higher effectiveness rating than their counterparts. Qualitatively, participants who believe the URRBMI to be ineffective list the following reasons: low outpatient service coverage, insufficient or undersupplied drugs and services in the insurance list, problems in the arrangement of deductibles and maximum compensatory payouts, provider-induced behaviour and increased healthcare service price. CONCLUSIONS: This exploration focuses on the reasons why rural residents think the scheme is invalid, which are vital for policy reform. Policies should focus on benefits design and coverage, the assumption of a supervisory role, avoiding financial risk stemming from critical illness and cross-sectoral actions to strengthen the primary healthcare system and comprehensive social security wealth. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8527163/ /pubmed/34667000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047699 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Jiang, Huan Zhao, Miaomiao Tian, Guomei Zhao, Zihua Ding, Ding Yin, Mei Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China |
title | Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China |
title_full | Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China |
title_fullStr | Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China |
title_short | Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China |
title_sort | perceived effect of financial risk protection by the urban–rural resident basic medical insurance scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in china |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jianghuan perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina AT zhaomiaomiao perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina AT tianguomei perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina AT zhaozihua perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina AT dingding perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina AT yinmei perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina |