Cargando…

Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China

OBJECTIVES: It is to explore the perceived financial risk protection effect of the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme (URRBMI) and its influencing factors to provide evidence to further improve the URRBMI. DESIGN: It is a cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Huan, Zhao, Miaomiao, Tian, Guomei, Zhao, Zihua, Ding, Ding, Yin, Mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047699
_version_ 1784586022052429824
author Jiang, Huan
Zhao, Miaomiao
Tian, Guomei
Zhao, Zihua
Ding, Ding
Yin, Mei
author_facet Jiang, Huan
Zhao, Miaomiao
Tian, Guomei
Zhao, Zihua
Ding, Ding
Yin, Mei
author_sort Jiang, Huan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: It is to explore the perceived financial risk protection effect of the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme (URRBMI) and its influencing factors to provide evidence to further improve the URRBMI. DESIGN: It is a cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods study is conducted in five provinces in rural China. Through stratified cluster random sampling, 1681 rural residents participate in a cross-sectional questionnaire survey (1657 valid questionnaires are retrieved). Thirty rural residents participate in in-depth interviews. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: A multivariate logistic regression analysis is adopted to identify factors influencing respondents’ perceptions. Semistructured interviews are used to identify the reasons why some respondents believed the URRBMI to be ineffective. RESULTS: Overall, 77.5% of respondents believe that the URRBMI is effective. Respondents, who are older, have a higher household income, prefer primary health facilities and provide a higher rating for critical illness compensation and maximum compensatory payouts. They are more likely to give the URRBMI a higher effectiveness rating than their counterparts. Qualitatively, participants who believe the URRBMI to be ineffective list the following reasons: low outpatient service coverage, insufficient or undersupplied drugs and services in the insurance list, problems in the arrangement of deductibles and maximum compensatory payouts, provider-induced behaviour and increased healthcare service price. CONCLUSIONS: This exploration focuses on the reasons why rural residents think the scheme is invalid, which are vital for policy reform. Policies should focus on benefits design and coverage, the assumption of a supervisory role, avoiding financial risk stemming from critical illness and cross-sectoral actions to strengthen the primary healthcare system and comprehensive social security wealth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8527163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85271632021-11-04 Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China Jiang, Huan Zhao, Miaomiao Tian, Guomei Zhao, Zihua Ding, Ding Yin, Mei BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: It is to explore the perceived financial risk protection effect of the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme (URRBMI) and its influencing factors to provide evidence to further improve the URRBMI. DESIGN: It is a cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods study is conducted in five provinces in rural China. Through stratified cluster random sampling, 1681 rural residents participate in a cross-sectional questionnaire survey (1657 valid questionnaires are retrieved). Thirty rural residents participate in in-depth interviews. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: A multivariate logistic regression analysis is adopted to identify factors influencing respondents’ perceptions. Semistructured interviews are used to identify the reasons why some respondents believed the URRBMI to be ineffective. RESULTS: Overall, 77.5% of respondents believe that the URRBMI is effective. Respondents, who are older, have a higher household income, prefer primary health facilities and provide a higher rating for critical illness compensation and maximum compensatory payouts. They are more likely to give the URRBMI a higher effectiveness rating than their counterparts. Qualitatively, participants who believe the URRBMI to be ineffective list the following reasons: low outpatient service coverage, insufficient or undersupplied drugs and services in the insurance list, problems in the arrangement of deductibles and maximum compensatory payouts, provider-induced behaviour and increased healthcare service price. CONCLUSIONS: This exploration focuses on the reasons why rural residents think the scheme is invalid, which are vital for policy reform. Policies should focus on benefits design and coverage, the assumption of a supervisory role, avoiding financial risk stemming from critical illness and cross-sectoral actions to strengthen the primary healthcare system and comprehensive social security wealth. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8527163/ /pubmed/34667000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047699 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Policy
Jiang, Huan
Zhao, Miaomiao
Tian, Guomei
Zhao, Zihua
Ding, Ding
Yin, Mei
Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China
title Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China
title_full Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China
title_fullStr Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China
title_full_unstemmed Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China
title_short Perceived effect of financial risk protection by the Urban–Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in China
title_sort perceived effect of financial risk protection by the urban–rural resident basic medical insurance scheme: a mixed-methods study of rural residents in china
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047699
work_keys_str_mv AT jianghuan perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina
AT zhaomiaomiao perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina
AT tianguomei perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina
AT zhaozihua perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina
AT dingding perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina
AT yinmei perceivedeffectoffinancialriskprotectionbytheurbanruralresidentbasicmedicalinsuranceschemeamixedmethodsstudyofruralresidentsinchina