Cargando…

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To assess the methodological quality of studies on prediction models developed using machine learning techniques across all medical specialties. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles reporting on the develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, Damen, Johanna A A, Takada, Toshihiko, Nijman, Steven W J, Dhiman, Paula, Ma, Jie, Collins, Gary S, Bajpai, Ram, Riley, Richard D, Moons, Karel G M, Hooft, Lotty
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2021
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2281

Ejemplares similares

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
por: Debray, Thomas PA, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
por: Snell, Kym I E, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies
por: Damen, Johanna A.A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The increasing need for systematic reviews of prognosis studies: strategies to facilitate review production and improve quality of primary research
por: Damen, Johanna A. A. G., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Damen, Johanna A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Empirical evidence of the impact of study characteristics on the performance of prediction models: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal
por: Wynants, Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effectiveness of contact tracing apps for SARS-CoV-2: a rapid systematic review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials in otorhinolaryngology: hardly any improvement since 1950
por: Peters, Jeroen P. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Overdiagnosis across medical disciplines: a scoping review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
por: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical trial registration was associated with lower risk of bias compared with non-registered trials among trials included in systematic reviews
por: Lindsley, Kristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Dementia prediction in the general population using clinically accessible variables: a proof-of-concept study using machine learning. The AGES-Reykjavik study
por: Twait, Emma L., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Supervised machine learning in wind forecasting and ramp event prediction
por: Dhiman, Harsh S, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of “unclear” Risk of Bias reporting in Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Rademaker, Maaike M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study
por: van Enst, W Annefloor, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A new community for those involved and interested in diagnosis and prognosis
por: Moons, Karel G. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols
por: van der Braak, Kim, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

What did we learn in 35 years of research on nutrition and supplements for age‐related macular degeneration: a systematic review
por: Pameijer, Els M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Investigating for bias in healthcare algorithms: a sex-stratified analysis of supervised machine learning models in liver disease prediction
por: Straw, Isabel, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study
por: Ochodo, Eleanor A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparing supervised and semi-supervised Machine Learning Models on Diagnosing Breast Cancer
por: Al-Azzam, Nosayba, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Supervised machine learning with Python: develop rich Python coding practices while exploring supervised machine learning
por: Smith, Taylor
Publicado: (2019)

The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement
por: Vinkers, Christiaan H., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Publication Bias in Laboratory Animal Research: A Survey on Magnitude, Drivers, Consequences and Potential Solutions
por: ter Riet, Gerben, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The rise and fall of supervised machine learning techniques
por: Jensen, Lars Juhl, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II ‐ binary and time‐to‐event outcomes
por: Riley, Richard D, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies
por: Naaktgeboren, Christiana A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review
por: de Hond, Anne A. H., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Treatment use in prognostic model research: a systematic review of cardiovascular prognostic studies
por: Pajouheshnia, Romin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ml2qt1r7ab2cq1e8jb43ugujl7