Cargando…
A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study
BACKGROUND: User-friendly information at the point of care for health care professionals should be well structured, rapidly accessible, comprehensive, and trustworthy. The reliability of information and the associated methodological process must be clear. There is no standard tool to evaluate the tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34609314 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27174 |
_version_ | 1784586064335208448 |
---|---|
author | Lenaerts, Gerlinde Bekkering, Geertruida E Goossens, Martine De Coninck, Leen Delvaux, Nicolas Cordyn, Sam Adriaenssens, Jef Aertgeerts, Bert Vankrunkelsven, Patrik |
author_facet | Lenaerts, Gerlinde Bekkering, Geertruida E Goossens, Martine De Coninck, Leen Delvaux, Nicolas Cordyn, Sam Adriaenssens, Jef Aertgeerts, Bert Vankrunkelsven, Patrik |
author_sort | Lenaerts, Gerlinde |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: User-friendly information at the point of care for health care professionals should be well structured, rapidly accessible, comprehensive, and trustworthy. The reliability of information and the associated methodological process must be clear. There is no standard tool to evaluate the trustworthiness of such point-of-care (POC) information. OBJECTIVE: We aim to develop and validate a new tool for assessment of trustworthiness of evidence-based POC resources to enhance the quality of POC resources and facilitate evidence-based practice. METHODS: We designed the Critical Appraisal of Point-of-Care Information (CAPOCI) tool based on the criteria important for assessment of trustworthiness of POC information, reported in a previously published review. A group of health care professionals and methodologists (the authors of this paper) defined criteria for the CAPOCI tool in an iterative process of discussion and pilot testing until consensus was reached. In the next step, all criteria were subject to content validation with a Delphi study. We invited an international panel of 10 experts to rate their agreement with the relevance and wording of the criteria and to give feedback. Consensus was reached when 70% of the experts agreed. When no consensus was reached, we reformulated the criteria based on the experts’ comments for a next round of the Delphi study. This process was repeated until consensus was reached for each criterion. In a last step, the interrater reliability of the CAPOCI tool was calculated with a 2-tailed Kendall tau correlation coefficient to quantify the agreement between 2 users who piloted the CAPOCI tool on 5 POC resources. Two scoring systems were tested: a 3-point ordinal scale and a 7-point Likert scale. RESULTS: After validation, the CAPOCI tool was designed with 11 criteria that focused on methodological quality and author-related information. The criteria assess authorship, literature search, use of preappraised evidence, critical appraisal of evidence, expert opinions, peer review, timeliness and updating, conflict of interest, and commercial support. Interrater agreement showed substantial agreement between 2 users for scoring with the 3-point ordinal scale (τ=.621, P<.01) and scoring with the 7-point Likert scale (τ=.677, P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: The CAPOCI tool may support validation teams in the assessment of trustworthiness of POC resources. It may also provide guidance for producers of POC resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8527381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85273812021-11-09 A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study Lenaerts, Gerlinde Bekkering, Geertruida E Goossens, Martine De Coninck, Leen Delvaux, Nicolas Cordyn, Sam Adriaenssens, Jef Aertgeerts, Bert Vankrunkelsven, Patrik J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: User-friendly information at the point of care for health care professionals should be well structured, rapidly accessible, comprehensive, and trustworthy. The reliability of information and the associated methodological process must be clear. There is no standard tool to evaluate the trustworthiness of such point-of-care (POC) information. OBJECTIVE: We aim to develop and validate a new tool for assessment of trustworthiness of evidence-based POC resources to enhance the quality of POC resources and facilitate evidence-based practice. METHODS: We designed the Critical Appraisal of Point-of-Care Information (CAPOCI) tool based on the criteria important for assessment of trustworthiness of POC information, reported in a previously published review. A group of health care professionals and methodologists (the authors of this paper) defined criteria for the CAPOCI tool in an iterative process of discussion and pilot testing until consensus was reached. In the next step, all criteria were subject to content validation with a Delphi study. We invited an international panel of 10 experts to rate their agreement with the relevance and wording of the criteria and to give feedback. Consensus was reached when 70% of the experts agreed. When no consensus was reached, we reformulated the criteria based on the experts’ comments for a next round of the Delphi study. This process was repeated until consensus was reached for each criterion. In a last step, the interrater reliability of the CAPOCI tool was calculated with a 2-tailed Kendall tau correlation coefficient to quantify the agreement between 2 users who piloted the CAPOCI tool on 5 POC resources. Two scoring systems were tested: a 3-point ordinal scale and a 7-point Likert scale. RESULTS: After validation, the CAPOCI tool was designed with 11 criteria that focused on methodological quality and author-related information. The criteria assess authorship, literature search, use of preappraised evidence, critical appraisal of evidence, expert opinions, peer review, timeliness and updating, conflict of interest, and commercial support. Interrater agreement showed substantial agreement between 2 users for scoring with the 3-point ordinal scale (τ=.621, P<.01) and scoring with the 7-point Likert scale (τ=.677, P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: The CAPOCI tool may support validation teams in the assessment of trustworthiness of POC resources. It may also provide guidance for producers of POC resources. JMIR Publications 2021-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8527381/ /pubmed/34609314 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27174 Text en ©Gerlinde Lenaerts, Geertruida E Bekkering, Martine Goossens, Leen De Coninck, Nicolas Delvaux, Sam Cordyn, Jef Adriaenssens, Bert Aertgeerts, Patrik Vankrunkelsven. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 05.10.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lenaerts, Gerlinde Bekkering, Geertruida E Goossens, Martine De Coninck, Leen Delvaux, Nicolas Cordyn, Sam Adriaenssens, Jef Aertgeerts, Bert Vankrunkelsven, Patrik A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study |
title | A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study |
title_full | A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study |
title_fullStr | A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study |
title_short | A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study |
title_sort | tool to assess the trustworthiness of evidence-based point-of-care information for health care professionals (capoci): design and validation study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34609314 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lenaertsgerlinde atooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT bekkeringgeertruidae atooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT goossensmartine atooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT deconinckleen atooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT delvauxnicolas atooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT cordynsam atooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT adriaenssensjef atooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT aertgeertsbert atooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT vankrunkelsvenpatrik atooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT lenaertsgerlinde tooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT bekkeringgeertruidae tooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT goossensmartine tooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT deconinckleen tooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT delvauxnicolas tooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT cordynsam tooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT adriaenssensjef tooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT aertgeertsbert tooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy AT vankrunkelsvenpatrik tooltoassessthetrustworthinessofevidencebasedpointofcareinformationforhealthcareprofessionalscapocidesignandvalidationstudy |