Cargando…

Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the ability of deep learning algorithms to detect and grade prostate cancer (PCa) in radical prostatectomy specimens. METHODS: We selected 12 whole-slide images of radical prostatectomy specimens. These images were divided into patches, and then, analyzed and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melo, Petronio Augusto de Souza, Estivallet, Carmen Liane Neubarth, Srougi, Miguel, Nahas, William Carlos, Leite, Katia Ramos Moreira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34730614
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e3198
_version_ 1784586091152539648
author Melo, Petronio Augusto de Souza
Estivallet, Carmen Liane Neubarth
Srougi, Miguel
Nahas, William Carlos
Leite, Katia Ramos Moreira
author_facet Melo, Petronio Augusto de Souza
Estivallet, Carmen Liane Neubarth
Srougi, Miguel
Nahas, William Carlos
Leite, Katia Ramos Moreira
author_sort Melo, Petronio Augusto de Souza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the ability of deep learning algorithms to detect and grade prostate cancer (PCa) in radical prostatectomy specimens. METHODS: We selected 12 whole-slide images of radical prostatectomy specimens. These images were divided into patches, and then, analyzed and annotated. The annotated areas were categorized as follows: stroma, normal glands, and Gleason patterns 3, 4, and 5. Two analyses were performed: i) a categorical image classification method that labels each image as benign or as Gleason 3, Gleason 4, or Gleason 5, and ii) a scanning method in which distinct areas representative of benign and different Gleason patterns are delineated and labeled separately by a pathologist. The Inception v3 Convolutional Neural Network architecture was used in categorical model training, and a Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network was used to train the scanning method. After training, we selected three new whole-slide images that were not used during the training to evaluate the model as our test dataset. The analysis results of the images using deep learning algorithms were compared with those obtained by the pathologists. RESULTS: In the categorical classification method, the trained model obtained a validation accuracy of 94.1% during training; however, the concordance with our expert uropathologists in the test dataset was only 44%. With the image-scanning method, our model demonstrated a validation accuracy of 91.2%. When the test images were used, the concordance between the deep learning method and uropathologists was 89%. CONCLUSION: Deep learning algorithms have a high potential for use in the diagnosis and grading of PCa. Scanning methods are likely to be superior to simple classification methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8527555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85275552021-10-22 Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques Melo, Petronio Augusto de Souza Estivallet, Carmen Liane Neubarth Srougi, Miguel Nahas, William Carlos Leite, Katia Ramos Moreira Clinics (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the ability of deep learning algorithms to detect and grade prostate cancer (PCa) in radical prostatectomy specimens. METHODS: We selected 12 whole-slide images of radical prostatectomy specimens. These images were divided into patches, and then, analyzed and annotated. The annotated areas were categorized as follows: stroma, normal glands, and Gleason patterns 3, 4, and 5. Two analyses were performed: i) a categorical image classification method that labels each image as benign or as Gleason 3, Gleason 4, or Gleason 5, and ii) a scanning method in which distinct areas representative of benign and different Gleason patterns are delineated and labeled separately by a pathologist. The Inception v3 Convolutional Neural Network architecture was used in categorical model training, and a Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network was used to train the scanning method. After training, we selected three new whole-slide images that were not used during the training to evaluate the model as our test dataset. The analysis results of the images using deep learning algorithms were compared with those obtained by the pathologists. RESULTS: In the categorical classification method, the trained model obtained a validation accuracy of 94.1% during training; however, the concordance with our expert uropathologists in the test dataset was only 44%. With the image-scanning method, our model demonstrated a validation accuracy of 91.2%. When the test images were used, the concordance between the deep learning method and uropathologists was 89%. CONCLUSION: Deep learning algorithms have a high potential for use in the diagnosis and grading of PCa. Scanning methods are likely to be superior to simple classification methods. Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2021-10-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8527555/ /pubmed/34730614 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e3198 Text en Copyright © 2021 CLINICS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Melo, Petronio Augusto de Souza
Estivallet, Carmen Liane Neubarth
Srougi, Miguel
Nahas, William Carlos
Leite, Katia Ramos Moreira
Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques
title Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques
title_full Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques
title_fullStr Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques
title_full_unstemmed Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques
title_short Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques
title_sort detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34730614
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e3198
work_keys_str_mv AT melopetronioaugustodesouza detectingandgradingprostatecancerinradicalprostatectomyspecimensthroughdeeplearningtechniques
AT estivalletcarmenlianeneubarth detectingandgradingprostatecancerinradicalprostatectomyspecimensthroughdeeplearningtechniques
AT srougimiguel detectingandgradingprostatecancerinradicalprostatectomyspecimensthroughdeeplearningtechniques
AT nahaswilliamcarlos detectingandgradingprostatecancerinradicalprostatectomyspecimensthroughdeeplearningtechniques
AT leitekatiaramosmoreira detectingandgradingprostatecancerinradicalprostatectomyspecimensthroughdeeplearningtechniques