Cargando…
Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Two antifibrotic drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are licensed for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, there is neither evidence from prospective data nor a guideline recommendation, which drug should be preferred over the other. This study aime...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y |
_version_ | 1784586118336872448 |
---|---|
author | Marijic, Pavo Schwarzkopf, Larissa Schwettmann, Lars Ruhnke, Thomas Trudzinski, Franziska Kreuter, Michael |
author_facet | Marijic, Pavo Schwarzkopf, Larissa Schwettmann, Lars Ruhnke, Thomas Trudzinski, Franziska Kreuter, Michael |
author_sort | Marijic, Pavo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Two antifibrotic drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are licensed for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, there is neither evidence from prospective data nor a guideline recommendation, which drug should be preferred over the other. This study aimed to compare pirfenidone and nintedanib-treated patients regarding all-cause mortality, all-cause and respiratory-related hospitalizations, and overall as well as respiratory-related health care costs borne by the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with SHI data was performed, including IPF patients treated either with pirfenidone or nintedanib. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores was applied to adjust for observed covariates. Weighted Cox models were estimated to analyze mortality and hospitalization. Weighted cost differences with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CI) were applied for cost analysis. RESULTS: We compared 840 patients treated with pirfenidone and 713 patients treated with nintedanib. Both groups were similar regarding two-year all-cause mortality (HR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.76; 1.07), one-year all cause (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95; 1.25) and respiratory-related hospitalization (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.72; 1.08). No significant differences were observed regarding total (€− 807, 95% CI: €− 2977; €1220) and respiratory-related (€− 1282, 95% CI: €− 3423; €534) costs. CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest that the patient-related outcomes mortality, hospitalization, and costs do not differ between the two currently available antifibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib. Hence, the decision on treatment with pirfenidone versus treatment with nintedanib ought to be made case-by-case taking clinical characteristics, comorbidities, comedications, individual risk of side effects, and patients’ preferences into account. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8527681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85276812021-10-25 Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study Marijic, Pavo Schwarzkopf, Larissa Schwettmann, Lars Ruhnke, Thomas Trudzinski, Franziska Kreuter, Michael Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Two antifibrotic drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are licensed for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, there is neither evidence from prospective data nor a guideline recommendation, which drug should be preferred over the other. This study aimed to compare pirfenidone and nintedanib-treated patients regarding all-cause mortality, all-cause and respiratory-related hospitalizations, and overall as well as respiratory-related health care costs borne by the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with SHI data was performed, including IPF patients treated either with pirfenidone or nintedanib. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores was applied to adjust for observed covariates. Weighted Cox models were estimated to analyze mortality and hospitalization. Weighted cost differences with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CI) were applied for cost analysis. RESULTS: We compared 840 patients treated with pirfenidone and 713 patients treated with nintedanib. Both groups were similar regarding two-year all-cause mortality (HR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.76; 1.07), one-year all cause (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95; 1.25) and respiratory-related hospitalization (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.72; 1.08). No significant differences were observed regarding total (€− 807, 95% CI: €− 2977; €1220) and respiratory-related (€− 1282, 95% CI: €− 3423; €534) costs. CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest that the patient-related outcomes mortality, hospitalization, and costs do not differ between the two currently available antifibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib. Hence, the decision on treatment with pirfenidone versus treatment with nintedanib ought to be made case-by-case taking clinical characteristics, comorbidities, comedications, individual risk of side effects, and patients’ preferences into account. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y. BioMed Central 2021-10-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8527681/ /pubmed/34666765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Marijic, Pavo Schwarzkopf, Larissa Schwettmann, Lars Ruhnke, Thomas Trudzinski, Franziska Kreuter, Michael Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marijicpavo pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy AT schwarzkopflarissa pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy AT schwettmannlars pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy AT ruhnkethomas pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy AT trudzinskifranziska pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy AT kreutermichael pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy |