Cargando…

Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Two antifibrotic drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are licensed for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, there is neither evidence from prospective data nor a guideline recommendation, which drug should be preferred over the other. This study aime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marijic, Pavo, Schwarzkopf, Larissa, Schwettmann, Lars, Ruhnke, Thomas, Trudzinski, Franziska, Kreuter, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y
_version_ 1784586118336872448
author Marijic, Pavo
Schwarzkopf, Larissa
Schwettmann, Lars
Ruhnke, Thomas
Trudzinski, Franziska
Kreuter, Michael
author_facet Marijic, Pavo
Schwarzkopf, Larissa
Schwettmann, Lars
Ruhnke, Thomas
Trudzinski, Franziska
Kreuter, Michael
author_sort Marijic, Pavo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two antifibrotic drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are licensed for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, there is neither evidence from prospective data nor a guideline recommendation, which drug should be preferred over the other. This study aimed to compare pirfenidone and nintedanib-treated patients regarding all-cause mortality, all-cause and respiratory-related hospitalizations, and overall as well as respiratory-related health care costs borne by the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with SHI data was performed, including IPF patients treated either with pirfenidone or nintedanib. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores was applied to adjust for observed covariates. Weighted Cox models were estimated to analyze mortality and hospitalization. Weighted cost differences with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CI) were applied for cost analysis. RESULTS: We compared 840 patients treated with pirfenidone and 713 patients treated with nintedanib. Both groups were similar regarding two-year all-cause mortality (HR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.76; 1.07), one-year all cause (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95; 1.25) and respiratory-related hospitalization (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.72; 1.08). No significant differences were observed regarding total (€− 807, 95% CI: €− 2977; €1220) and respiratory-related (€− 1282, 95% CI: €− 3423; €534) costs. CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest that the patient-related outcomes mortality, hospitalization, and costs do not differ between the two currently available antifibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib. Hence, the decision on treatment with pirfenidone versus treatment with nintedanib ought to be made case-by-case taking clinical characteristics, comorbidities, comedications, individual risk of side effects, and patients’ preferences into account. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8527681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85276812021-10-25 Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study Marijic, Pavo Schwarzkopf, Larissa Schwettmann, Lars Ruhnke, Thomas Trudzinski, Franziska Kreuter, Michael Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Two antifibrotic drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are licensed for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, there is neither evidence from prospective data nor a guideline recommendation, which drug should be preferred over the other. This study aimed to compare pirfenidone and nintedanib-treated patients regarding all-cause mortality, all-cause and respiratory-related hospitalizations, and overall as well as respiratory-related health care costs borne by the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with SHI data was performed, including IPF patients treated either with pirfenidone or nintedanib. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores was applied to adjust for observed covariates. Weighted Cox models were estimated to analyze mortality and hospitalization. Weighted cost differences with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CI) were applied for cost analysis. RESULTS: We compared 840 patients treated with pirfenidone and 713 patients treated with nintedanib. Both groups were similar regarding two-year all-cause mortality (HR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.76; 1.07), one-year all cause (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95; 1.25) and respiratory-related hospitalization (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.72; 1.08). No significant differences were observed regarding total (€− 807, 95% CI: €− 2977; €1220) and respiratory-related (€− 1282, 95% CI: €− 3423; €534) costs. CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest that the patient-related outcomes mortality, hospitalization, and costs do not differ between the two currently available antifibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib. Hence, the decision on treatment with pirfenidone versus treatment with nintedanib ought to be made case-by-case taking clinical characteristics, comorbidities, comedications, individual risk of side effects, and patients’ preferences into account. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y. BioMed Central 2021-10-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8527681/ /pubmed/34666765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Marijic, Pavo
Schwarzkopf, Larissa
Schwettmann, Lars
Ruhnke, Thomas
Trudzinski, Franziska
Kreuter, Michael
Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study
title Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y
work_keys_str_mv AT marijicpavo pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT schwarzkopflarissa pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT schwettmannlars pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ruhnkethomas pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT trudzinskifranziska pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kreutermichael pirfenidonevsnintedanibinpatientswithidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisaretrospectivecohortstudy