Cargando…
De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study
BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy prevalence is internationally reported to be around 10%. However, the majority of patients who report a penicillin allergy do not have a clinically significant hypersensitivity. Few patients undergo evaluation, which leads to overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06794-1 |
_version_ | 1784586119343505408 |
---|---|
author | Steenvoorden, Linde Bjoernestad, Erik Oeglaend Kvesetmoen, Thor-Agne Gulsvik, Anne Kristine |
author_facet | Steenvoorden, Linde Bjoernestad, Erik Oeglaend Kvesetmoen, Thor-Agne Gulsvik, Anne Kristine |
author_sort | Steenvoorden, Linde |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy prevalence is internationally reported to be around 10%. However, the majority of patients who report a penicillin allergy do not have a clinically significant hypersensitivity. Few patients undergo evaluation, which leads to overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The objective of this study was to monitor prevalence and implement screening and testing of hospitalized patients. METHODS: All patients admitted to the medical department in a local hospital in Oslo, Norway, with a self-reported penicillin allergy were screened using an interview algorithm to categorize the reported allergy as high-risk or low-risk. Patients with a history of low-risk allergy underwent a direct graded oral amoxicillin challenge to verify absence of a true IgE-type allergy. RESULTS: 257 of 5529 inpatients (4.6%) reported a penicillin allergy. 191 (74%) of these patients underwent screening, of which 86 (45%) had an allergy categorized as low-risk. 54 (63%) of the low-risk patients consented to an oral test. 98% of these did not have an immediate reaction to the amoxicillin challenge, and their penicillin allergy label could thus be removed. 42% of the patients under treatment with antibiotics during inclusion could switch to treatment with penicillins immediately after testing, in line with the national recommendations for antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of self-reported penicillin allergy was lower in this Norwegian population, than reported in other studies. Screening and testing of hospitalized patients with self-reported penicillin allergy is a feasible and easy measure to de-label a large proportion of patients, resulting in immediate clinical and environmental benefit. Our findings suggest that non-allergist physicians can safely undertake clinically impactful allergy evaluations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8527685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85276852021-10-25 De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study Steenvoorden, Linde Bjoernestad, Erik Oeglaend Kvesetmoen, Thor-Agne Gulsvik, Anne Kristine BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy prevalence is internationally reported to be around 10%. However, the majority of patients who report a penicillin allergy do not have a clinically significant hypersensitivity. Few patients undergo evaluation, which leads to overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The objective of this study was to monitor prevalence and implement screening and testing of hospitalized patients. METHODS: All patients admitted to the medical department in a local hospital in Oslo, Norway, with a self-reported penicillin allergy were screened using an interview algorithm to categorize the reported allergy as high-risk or low-risk. Patients with a history of low-risk allergy underwent a direct graded oral amoxicillin challenge to verify absence of a true IgE-type allergy. RESULTS: 257 of 5529 inpatients (4.6%) reported a penicillin allergy. 191 (74%) of these patients underwent screening, of which 86 (45%) had an allergy categorized as low-risk. 54 (63%) of the low-risk patients consented to an oral test. 98% of these did not have an immediate reaction to the amoxicillin challenge, and their penicillin allergy label could thus be removed. 42% of the patients under treatment with antibiotics during inclusion could switch to treatment with penicillins immediately after testing, in line with the national recommendations for antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of self-reported penicillin allergy was lower in this Norwegian population, than reported in other studies. Screening and testing of hospitalized patients with self-reported penicillin allergy is a feasible and easy measure to de-label a large proportion of patients, resulting in immediate clinical and environmental benefit. Our findings suggest that non-allergist physicians can safely undertake clinically impactful allergy evaluations. BioMed Central 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8527685/ /pubmed/34670500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06794-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Steenvoorden, Linde Bjoernestad, Erik Oeglaend Kvesetmoen, Thor-Agne Gulsvik, Anne Kristine De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study |
title | De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study |
title_full | De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study |
title_short | De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study |
title_sort | de-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06794-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steenvoordenlinde delabellingpenicillinallergyinacutelyhospitalizedpatientsapilotstudy AT bjoernestaderikoeglaend delabellingpenicillinallergyinacutelyhospitalizedpatientsapilotstudy AT kvesetmoenthoragne delabellingpenicillinallergyinacutelyhospitalizedpatientsapilotstudy AT gulsvikannekristine delabellingpenicillinallergyinacutelyhospitalizedpatientsapilotstudy |