Cargando…

De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy prevalence is internationally reported to be around 10%. However, the majority of patients who report a penicillin allergy do not have a clinically significant hypersensitivity. Few patients undergo evaluation, which leads to overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steenvoorden, Linde, Bjoernestad, Erik Oeglaend, Kvesetmoen, Thor-Agne, Gulsvik, Anne Kristine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06794-1
_version_ 1784586119343505408
author Steenvoorden, Linde
Bjoernestad, Erik Oeglaend
Kvesetmoen, Thor-Agne
Gulsvik, Anne Kristine
author_facet Steenvoorden, Linde
Bjoernestad, Erik Oeglaend
Kvesetmoen, Thor-Agne
Gulsvik, Anne Kristine
author_sort Steenvoorden, Linde
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy prevalence is internationally reported to be around 10%. However, the majority of patients who report a penicillin allergy do not have a clinically significant hypersensitivity. Few patients undergo evaluation, which leads to overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The objective of this study was to monitor prevalence and implement screening and testing of hospitalized patients. METHODS: All patients admitted to the medical department in a local hospital in Oslo, Norway, with a self-reported penicillin allergy were screened using an interview algorithm to categorize the reported allergy as high-risk or low-risk. Patients with a history of low-risk allergy underwent a direct graded oral amoxicillin challenge to verify absence of a true IgE-type allergy. RESULTS: 257 of 5529 inpatients (4.6%) reported a penicillin allergy. 191 (74%) of these patients underwent screening, of which 86 (45%) had an allergy categorized as low-risk. 54 (63%) of the low-risk patients consented to an oral test. 98% of these did not have an immediate reaction to the amoxicillin challenge, and their penicillin allergy label could thus be removed. 42% of the patients under treatment with antibiotics during inclusion could switch to treatment with penicillins immediately after testing, in line with the national recommendations for antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of self-reported penicillin allergy was lower in this Norwegian population, than reported in other studies. Screening and testing of hospitalized patients with self-reported penicillin allergy is a feasible and easy measure to de-label a large proportion of patients, resulting in immediate clinical and environmental benefit. Our findings suggest that non-allergist physicians can safely undertake clinically impactful allergy evaluations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8527685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85276852021-10-25 De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study Steenvoorden, Linde Bjoernestad, Erik Oeglaend Kvesetmoen, Thor-Agne Gulsvik, Anne Kristine BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy prevalence is internationally reported to be around 10%. However, the majority of patients who report a penicillin allergy do not have a clinically significant hypersensitivity. Few patients undergo evaluation, which leads to overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The objective of this study was to monitor prevalence and implement screening and testing of hospitalized patients. METHODS: All patients admitted to the medical department in a local hospital in Oslo, Norway, with a self-reported penicillin allergy were screened using an interview algorithm to categorize the reported allergy as high-risk or low-risk. Patients with a history of low-risk allergy underwent a direct graded oral amoxicillin challenge to verify absence of a true IgE-type allergy. RESULTS: 257 of 5529 inpatients (4.6%) reported a penicillin allergy. 191 (74%) of these patients underwent screening, of which 86 (45%) had an allergy categorized as low-risk. 54 (63%) of the low-risk patients consented to an oral test. 98% of these did not have an immediate reaction to the amoxicillin challenge, and their penicillin allergy label could thus be removed. 42% of the patients under treatment with antibiotics during inclusion could switch to treatment with penicillins immediately after testing, in line with the national recommendations for antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of self-reported penicillin allergy was lower in this Norwegian population, than reported in other studies. Screening and testing of hospitalized patients with self-reported penicillin allergy is a feasible and easy measure to de-label a large proportion of patients, resulting in immediate clinical and environmental benefit. Our findings suggest that non-allergist physicians can safely undertake clinically impactful allergy evaluations. BioMed Central 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8527685/ /pubmed/34670500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06794-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Steenvoorden, Linde
Bjoernestad, Erik Oeglaend
Kvesetmoen, Thor-Agne
Gulsvik, Anne Kristine
De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study
title De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study
title_full De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study
title_fullStr De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study
title_short De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study
title_sort de-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06794-1
work_keys_str_mv AT steenvoordenlinde delabellingpenicillinallergyinacutelyhospitalizedpatientsapilotstudy
AT bjoernestaderikoeglaend delabellingpenicillinallergyinacutelyhospitalizedpatientsapilotstudy
AT kvesetmoenthoragne delabellingpenicillinallergyinacutelyhospitalizedpatientsapilotstudy
AT gulsvikannekristine delabellingpenicillinallergyinacutelyhospitalizedpatientsapilotstudy