Cargando…

Comparative proteomics of thylakoids from Arabidopsis grown in laboratory and field conditions

Compared to controlled laboratory conditions, plant growth in the field is rarely optimal since it is frequently challenged by large fluctuations in light and temperature which lower the efficiency of photosynthesis and lead to photo‐oxidative stress. Plants grown under natural conditions therefore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flannery, Sarah E., Pastorelli, Federica, Wood, William H. J., Hunter, C. Neil, Dickman, Mark J., Jackson, Philip J., Johnson, Matthew P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.355
_version_ 1784586190109802496
author Flannery, Sarah E.
Pastorelli, Federica
Wood, William H. J.
Hunter, C. Neil
Dickman, Mark J.
Jackson, Philip J.
Johnson, Matthew P.
author_facet Flannery, Sarah E.
Pastorelli, Federica
Wood, William H. J.
Hunter, C. Neil
Dickman, Mark J.
Jackson, Philip J.
Johnson, Matthew P.
author_sort Flannery, Sarah E.
collection PubMed
description Compared to controlled laboratory conditions, plant growth in the field is rarely optimal since it is frequently challenged by large fluctuations in light and temperature which lower the efficiency of photosynthesis and lead to photo‐oxidative stress. Plants grown under natural conditions therefore place an increased onus on the regulatory mechanisms that protect and repair the delicate photosynthetic machinery. Yet, the exact changes in thylakoid proteome composition which allow plants to acclimate to the natural environment remain largely unexplored. Here, we use quantitative label‐free proteomics to demonstrate that field‐grown Arabidopsis plants incorporate aspects of both the low and high light acclimation strategies previously observed in laboratory‐grown plants. Field plants showed increases in the relative abundance of ATP synthase, cytochrome b (6) f, ferredoxin‐NADP(+) reductases (FNR1 and FNR2) and their membrane tethers TIC62 and TROL, thylakoid architecture proteins CURT1A, CURT1B, RIQ1, and RIQ2, the minor monomeric antenna complex CP29.3, rapidly‐relaxing non‐photochemical quenching (qE)‐related proteins PSBS and VDE, the photosystem II (PSII) repair machinery and the cyclic electron transfer complexes NDH, PGRL1B, and PGR5, in addition to decreases in the amounts of LHCII trimers composed of LHCB1.1, LHCB1.2, LHCB1.4, and LHCB2 proteins and CP29.2, all features typical of a laboratory high light acclimation response. Conversely, field plants also showed increases in the abundance of light harvesting proteins LHCB1.3 and CP29.1, zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) and the slowly‐relaxing non‐photochemical quenching (qI)‐related protein LCNP, changes previously associated with a laboratory low light acclimation response. Field plants also showed distinct changes to the proteome including the appearance of stress‐related proteins ELIP1 and ELIP2 and changes to proteins that are largely invariant under laboratory conditions such as state transition related proteins STN7 and TAP38. We discuss the significance of these alterations in the thylakoid proteome considering the unique set of challenges faced by plants growing under natural conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8528093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85280932021-10-27 Comparative proteomics of thylakoids from Arabidopsis grown in laboratory and field conditions Flannery, Sarah E. Pastorelli, Federica Wood, William H. J. Hunter, C. Neil Dickman, Mark J. Jackson, Philip J. Johnson, Matthew P. Plant Direct Original Research Compared to controlled laboratory conditions, plant growth in the field is rarely optimal since it is frequently challenged by large fluctuations in light and temperature which lower the efficiency of photosynthesis and lead to photo‐oxidative stress. Plants grown under natural conditions therefore place an increased onus on the regulatory mechanisms that protect and repair the delicate photosynthetic machinery. Yet, the exact changes in thylakoid proteome composition which allow plants to acclimate to the natural environment remain largely unexplored. Here, we use quantitative label‐free proteomics to demonstrate that field‐grown Arabidopsis plants incorporate aspects of both the low and high light acclimation strategies previously observed in laboratory‐grown plants. Field plants showed increases in the relative abundance of ATP synthase, cytochrome b (6) f, ferredoxin‐NADP(+) reductases (FNR1 and FNR2) and their membrane tethers TIC62 and TROL, thylakoid architecture proteins CURT1A, CURT1B, RIQ1, and RIQ2, the minor monomeric antenna complex CP29.3, rapidly‐relaxing non‐photochemical quenching (qE)‐related proteins PSBS and VDE, the photosystem II (PSII) repair machinery and the cyclic electron transfer complexes NDH, PGRL1B, and PGR5, in addition to decreases in the amounts of LHCII trimers composed of LHCB1.1, LHCB1.2, LHCB1.4, and LHCB2 proteins and CP29.2, all features typical of a laboratory high light acclimation response. Conversely, field plants also showed increases in the abundance of light harvesting proteins LHCB1.3 and CP29.1, zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) and the slowly‐relaxing non‐photochemical quenching (qI)‐related protein LCNP, changes previously associated with a laboratory low light acclimation response. Field plants also showed distinct changes to the proteome including the appearance of stress‐related proteins ELIP1 and ELIP2 and changes to proteins that are largely invariant under laboratory conditions such as state transition related proteins STN7 and TAP38. We discuss the significance of these alterations in the thylakoid proteome considering the unique set of challenges faced by plants growing under natural conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8528093/ /pubmed/34712896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.355 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Plant Direct published by American Society of Plant Biologists and the Society for Experimental Biology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Flannery, Sarah E.
Pastorelli, Federica
Wood, William H. J.
Hunter, C. Neil
Dickman, Mark J.
Jackson, Philip J.
Johnson, Matthew P.
Comparative proteomics of thylakoids from Arabidopsis grown in laboratory and field conditions
title Comparative proteomics of thylakoids from Arabidopsis grown in laboratory and field conditions
title_full Comparative proteomics of thylakoids from Arabidopsis grown in laboratory and field conditions
title_fullStr Comparative proteomics of thylakoids from Arabidopsis grown in laboratory and field conditions
title_full_unstemmed Comparative proteomics of thylakoids from Arabidopsis grown in laboratory and field conditions
title_short Comparative proteomics of thylakoids from Arabidopsis grown in laboratory and field conditions
title_sort comparative proteomics of thylakoids from arabidopsis grown in laboratory and field conditions
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.355
work_keys_str_mv AT flannerysarahe comparativeproteomicsofthylakoidsfromarabidopsisgrowninlaboratoryandfieldconditions
AT pastorellifederica comparativeproteomicsofthylakoidsfromarabidopsisgrowninlaboratoryandfieldconditions
AT woodwilliamhj comparativeproteomicsofthylakoidsfromarabidopsisgrowninlaboratoryandfieldconditions
AT huntercneil comparativeproteomicsofthylakoidsfromarabidopsisgrowninlaboratoryandfieldconditions
AT dickmanmarkj comparativeproteomicsofthylakoidsfromarabidopsisgrowninlaboratoryandfieldconditions
AT jacksonphilipj comparativeproteomicsofthylakoidsfromarabidopsisgrowninlaboratoryandfieldconditions
AT johnsonmatthewp comparativeproteomicsofthylakoidsfromarabidopsisgrowninlaboratoryandfieldconditions