Cargando…

Generation of False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Results with Testing Conditions outside Manufacturer Recommendations: A Scientific Approach to Pandemic Misinformation

Antigen-based rapid diagnostics tests (Ag-RDTs) are useful tools for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection. However, misleading demonstrations of the Abbott Panbio coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Ag-RDT on social media claimed that SARS-CoV-2 antigen could be det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patriquin, Glenn, Davidson, Ross J., Hatchette, Todd F., Head, Breanne M., Mejia, Edgard, Becker, Michael G., Meyers, Adrienne, Sandstrom, Paul, Hatchette, Jacob, Block, Ava, Smith, Nicole, Ross, John, LeBlanc, Jason J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34668722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00683-21
_version_ 1784586195737509888
author Patriquin, Glenn
Davidson, Ross J.
Hatchette, Todd F.
Head, Breanne M.
Mejia, Edgard
Becker, Michael G.
Meyers, Adrienne
Sandstrom, Paul
Hatchette, Jacob
Block, Ava
Smith, Nicole
Ross, John
LeBlanc, Jason J.
author_facet Patriquin, Glenn
Davidson, Ross J.
Hatchette, Todd F.
Head, Breanne M.
Mejia, Edgard
Becker, Michael G.
Meyers, Adrienne
Sandstrom, Paul
Hatchette, Jacob
Block, Ava
Smith, Nicole
Ross, John
LeBlanc, Jason J.
author_sort Patriquin, Glenn
collection PubMed
description Antigen-based rapid diagnostics tests (Ag-RDTs) are useful tools for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection. However, misleading demonstrations of the Abbott Panbio coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Ag-RDT on social media claimed that SARS-CoV-2 antigen could be detected in municipal water and food products. To offer a scientific rebuttal to pandemic misinformation and disinformation, this study explored the impact of using the Panbio SARS-CoV-2 assay with conditions falling outside manufacturer recommendations. Using Panbio, various water and food products, laboratory buffers, and SARS-CoV-2-negative clinical specimens were tested with and without manufacturer buffer. Additional experiments were conducted to assess the role of each Panbio buffer component (tricine, NaCl, pH, and Tween 20) as well as the impact of temperature (4°C, 20°C, and 45°C) and humidity (90%) on assay performance. Direct sample testing (without the kit buffer) resulted in false-positive signals resembling those obtained with SARS-CoV-2 positive controls tested under proper conditions. The likely explanation of these artifacts is nonspecific interactions between the SARS-CoV-2-specific conjugated and capture antibodies, as proteinase K treatment abrogated this phenomenon, and thermal shift assays showed pH-induced conformational changes under conditions promoting artifact formation. Omitting, altering, and reverse engineering the kit buffer all supported the importance of maintaining buffering capacity, ionic strength, and pH for accurate kit function. Interestingly, the Panbio assay could tolerate some extremes of temperature and humidity outside manufacturer claims. Our data support strict adherence to manufacturer instructions to avoid false-positive SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT reactions, otherwise resulting in anxiety, overuse of public health resources, and dissemination of misinformation. IMPORTANCE With the Panbio severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen test being deployed in over 120 countries worldwide, understanding conditions required for its ideal performance is critical. Recently on social media, this kit was shown to generate false positives when manufacturer recommendations were not followed. While erroneous results from improper use of a test may not be surprising to some health care professionals, understanding why false positives occur can help reduce the propagation of misinformation and provide a scientific rebuttal for these aberrant findings. This study demonstrated that the kit buffer’s pH, ionic strength, and buffering capacity were critical components to ensure proper kit function and avoid generation of false-positive results. Typically, false positives arise from cross-reacting or interfering substances; however, this study demonstrated a mechanism where false positives were generated under conditions favoring nonspecific interactions between the two antibodies designed for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection. Following the manufacturer instructions is critical for accurate test results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8528119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85281192021-11-08 Generation of False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Results with Testing Conditions outside Manufacturer Recommendations: A Scientific Approach to Pandemic Misinformation Patriquin, Glenn Davidson, Ross J. Hatchette, Todd F. Head, Breanne M. Mejia, Edgard Becker, Michael G. Meyers, Adrienne Sandstrom, Paul Hatchette, Jacob Block, Ava Smith, Nicole Ross, John LeBlanc, Jason J. Microbiol Spectr Research Article Antigen-based rapid diagnostics tests (Ag-RDTs) are useful tools for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection. However, misleading demonstrations of the Abbott Panbio coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Ag-RDT on social media claimed that SARS-CoV-2 antigen could be detected in municipal water and food products. To offer a scientific rebuttal to pandemic misinformation and disinformation, this study explored the impact of using the Panbio SARS-CoV-2 assay with conditions falling outside manufacturer recommendations. Using Panbio, various water and food products, laboratory buffers, and SARS-CoV-2-negative clinical specimens were tested with and without manufacturer buffer. Additional experiments were conducted to assess the role of each Panbio buffer component (tricine, NaCl, pH, and Tween 20) as well as the impact of temperature (4°C, 20°C, and 45°C) and humidity (90%) on assay performance. Direct sample testing (without the kit buffer) resulted in false-positive signals resembling those obtained with SARS-CoV-2 positive controls tested under proper conditions. The likely explanation of these artifacts is nonspecific interactions between the SARS-CoV-2-specific conjugated and capture antibodies, as proteinase K treatment abrogated this phenomenon, and thermal shift assays showed pH-induced conformational changes under conditions promoting artifact formation. Omitting, altering, and reverse engineering the kit buffer all supported the importance of maintaining buffering capacity, ionic strength, and pH for accurate kit function. Interestingly, the Panbio assay could tolerate some extremes of temperature and humidity outside manufacturer claims. Our data support strict adherence to manufacturer instructions to avoid false-positive SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT reactions, otherwise resulting in anxiety, overuse of public health resources, and dissemination of misinformation. IMPORTANCE With the Panbio severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen test being deployed in over 120 countries worldwide, understanding conditions required for its ideal performance is critical. Recently on social media, this kit was shown to generate false positives when manufacturer recommendations were not followed. While erroneous results from improper use of a test may not be surprising to some health care professionals, understanding why false positives occur can help reduce the propagation of misinformation and provide a scientific rebuttal for these aberrant findings. This study demonstrated that the kit buffer’s pH, ionic strength, and buffering capacity were critical components to ensure proper kit function and avoid generation of false-positive results. Typically, false positives arise from cross-reacting or interfering substances; however, this study demonstrated a mechanism where false positives were generated under conditions favoring nonspecific interactions between the two antibodies designed for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection. Following the manufacturer instructions is critical for accurate test results. American Society for Microbiology 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8528119/ /pubmed/34668722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00683-21 Text en © Crown copyright 2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Patriquin, Glenn
Davidson, Ross J.
Hatchette, Todd F.
Head, Breanne M.
Mejia, Edgard
Becker, Michael G.
Meyers, Adrienne
Sandstrom, Paul
Hatchette, Jacob
Block, Ava
Smith, Nicole
Ross, John
LeBlanc, Jason J.
Generation of False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Results with Testing Conditions outside Manufacturer Recommendations: A Scientific Approach to Pandemic Misinformation
title Generation of False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Results with Testing Conditions outside Manufacturer Recommendations: A Scientific Approach to Pandemic Misinformation
title_full Generation of False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Results with Testing Conditions outside Manufacturer Recommendations: A Scientific Approach to Pandemic Misinformation
title_fullStr Generation of False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Results with Testing Conditions outside Manufacturer Recommendations: A Scientific Approach to Pandemic Misinformation
title_full_unstemmed Generation of False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Results with Testing Conditions outside Manufacturer Recommendations: A Scientific Approach to Pandemic Misinformation
title_short Generation of False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Results with Testing Conditions outside Manufacturer Recommendations: A Scientific Approach to Pandemic Misinformation
title_sort generation of false-positive sars-cov-2 antigen results with testing conditions outside manufacturer recommendations: a scientific approach to pandemic misinformation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34668722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00683-21
work_keys_str_mv AT patriquinglenn generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT davidsonrossj generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT hatchettetoddf generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT headbreannem generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT mejiaedgard generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT beckermichaelg generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT meyersadrienne generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT sandstrompaul generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT hatchettejacob generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT blockava generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT smithnicole generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT rossjohn generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation
AT leblancjasonj generationoffalsepositivesarscov2antigenresultswithtestingconditionsoutsidemanufacturerrecommendationsascientificapproachtopandemicmisinformation