Cargando…

Opinion on the impact of non‐monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments

This Opinion assesses the biological relevance of the non‐monotonic dose responses (NMDR) identified in a previous EFSA External Report (Beausoleil et al., 2016) produced under GP/EFSA/SCER/2014/01 and the follow‐up probabilistic assessment (Chevillotte et al., 2017a,b), focusing on the in vivo data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: More, Simon, Benford, Diane, Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne, Bampidis, Vasileios, Bragard, Claude, Halldorsson, Thorhallur, Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio, Koutsoumanis, Kostas, Lambré, Claude, Machera, Kyriaki, Mullins, Ewen, Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Schlatter, Josef, Schrenk, Dieter, Turck, Dominique, Tarazona, Jose, Younes, Maged
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712366
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6877
_version_ 1784586260806893568
author More, Simon
Benford, Diane
Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne
Bampidis, Vasileios
Bragard, Claude
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Lambré, Claude
Machera, Kyriaki
Mullins, Ewen
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Schlatter, Josef
Schrenk, Dieter
Turck, Dominique
Tarazona, Jose
Younes, Maged
author_facet More, Simon
Benford, Diane
Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne
Bampidis, Vasileios
Bragard, Claude
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Lambré, Claude
Machera, Kyriaki
Mullins, Ewen
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Schlatter, Josef
Schrenk, Dieter
Turck, Dominique
Tarazona, Jose
Younes, Maged
collection PubMed
description This Opinion assesses the biological relevance of the non‐monotonic dose responses (NMDR) identified in a previous EFSA External Report (Beausoleil et al., 2016) produced under GP/EFSA/SCER/2014/01 and the follow‐up probabilistic assessment (Chevillotte et al., 2017a,b), focusing on the in vivo data sets fulfilling most of the checkpoints of the visual/statistical‐based analysis identified in Beausoleil et al. (2016). The evaluation was completed with cases discussed in EFSA assessments and the update of the scientific literature. Observations of NMDR were confirmed in certain studies and are particularly relevant for receptor‐mediated effects. Based on the results of the evaluation, the Opinion proposes an approach to be applied during the risk assessment process when apparent non‐monotonicity is observed, also providing advice on specific elements to be considered to facilitate the assessment of NMDR in EFSA risk assessments. The proposed approach was applied to two case studies, Bisphenol A and bis(2‐ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and these evaluations are reported in dedicated annexes. Considering the potential impact of NMDRs in regulatory risk assessment, the Scientific Committee recommends a concerted international effort on developing internationally agreed guidance and harmonised frameworks for identifying and addressing NMDRs in the risk assessment process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8528485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85284852021-10-27 Opinion on the impact of non‐monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments More, Simon Benford, Diane Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne Bampidis, Vasileios Bragard, Claude Halldorsson, Thorhallur Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio Koutsoumanis, Kostas Lambré, Claude Machera, Kyriaki Mullins, Ewen Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Schlatter, Josef Schrenk, Dieter Turck, Dominique Tarazona, Jose Younes, Maged EFSA J Scientific Opinion This Opinion assesses the biological relevance of the non‐monotonic dose responses (NMDR) identified in a previous EFSA External Report (Beausoleil et al., 2016) produced under GP/EFSA/SCER/2014/01 and the follow‐up probabilistic assessment (Chevillotte et al., 2017a,b), focusing on the in vivo data sets fulfilling most of the checkpoints of the visual/statistical‐based analysis identified in Beausoleil et al. (2016). The evaluation was completed with cases discussed in EFSA assessments and the update of the scientific literature. Observations of NMDR were confirmed in certain studies and are particularly relevant for receptor‐mediated effects. Based on the results of the evaluation, the Opinion proposes an approach to be applied during the risk assessment process when apparent non‐monotonicity is observed, also providing advice on specific elements to be considered to facilitate the assessment of NMDR in EFSA risk assessments. The proposed approach was applied to two case studies, Bisphenol A and bis(2‐ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and these evaluations are reported in dedicated annexes. Considering the potential impact of NMDRs in regulatory risk assessment, the Scientific Committee recommends a concerted international effort on developing internationally agreed guidance and harmonised frameworks for identifying and addressing NMDRs in the risk assessment process. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8528485/ /pubmed/34712366 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6877 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
More, Simon
Benford, Diane
Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne
Bampidis, Vasileios
Bragard, Claude
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Lambré, Claude
Machera, Kyriaki
Mullins, Ewen
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Schlatter, Josef
Schrenk, Dieter
Turck, Dominique
Tarazona, Jose
Younes, Maged
Opinion on the impact of non‐monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments
title Opinion on the impact of non‐monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments
title_full Opinion on the impact of non‐monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments
title_fullStr Opinion on the impact of non‐monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments
title_full_unstemmed Opinion on the impact of non‐monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments
title_short Opinion on the impact of non‐monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments
title_sort opinion on the impact of non‐monotonic dose responses on efsa′s human health risk assessments
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712366
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6877
work_keys_str_mv AT opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT moresimon opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT benforddiane opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT hougaardbennekoususanne opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT bampidisvasileios opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT bragardclaude opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT halldorssonthorhallur opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT hernandezjerezantonio opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT koutsoumaniskostas opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT lambreclaude opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT macherakyriaki opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT mullinsewen opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT nielsensørensaxmose opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT schlatterjosef opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT schrenkdieter opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT turckdominique opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT tarazonajose opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments
AT younesmaged opinionontheimpactofnonmonotonicdoseresponsesonefsashumanhealthriskassessments