Cargando…

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) for predicting disease severity or mortality outcomes in cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) is a member of the interleukin-1 receptor family. It is raised in various cardiovascular diseases, but its value in predicting disease severity or mortality outcomes has been controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ip, Christina, Luk, King Sum, Yuen, Vincent Lok Cheung, Chiang, Lorraine, Chan, Ching Ki, Ho, Kevin, Gong, Mengqi, Lee, Teddy Tai Loy, Leung, Keith Sai Kit, Roever, Leonardo, Bazoukis, George, Lampropoulos, Konstantinos, Li, Ka Hou Christien, Tse, Gary, Liu, Tong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100887
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) is a member of the interleukin-1 receptor family. It is raised in various cardiovascular diseases, but its value in predicting disease severity or mortality outcomes has been controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether sST2 levels differed between survivors and non-survivors of patients with cardiovascular diseases, and whether elevated sST2 levels correlated with adverse outcomes. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched until 23rd June 2021 for studies that evaluated the relationship between sST2 levels and cardiovascular disease severity or mortality. RESULTS: A total of 707 entries were retrieved from both databases, of which 14 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. In acute heart failure, sST2 levels did not differ between survivors and non-survivors (mean difference [MD]: 24.2 ± 13.0 ng/ml; P = 0.06; I(2): 95%). Elevated sST2 levels tend to be associated with increased mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.12, 95 %CI: 0.99–1.27, P = 0.07; I(2): 88%). In chronic heart failure, sST2 levels were higher in non-survivors than in survivors (MD: 0.19 ± 0.04 ng/ml; P = 0.001; I(2): 0%) and elevated levels were associated with increased mortality risk (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.27–2.12, P < 0.001; I(2): 82%). sST2 levels were significantly higher in severe disease compared to less severe disease (MD: 1.56 ± 0.46 ng/ml; P = 0.001; I(2): 98%). Finally, in stable coronary artery disease, sST2 levels were higher in non-survivors than survivors (MD: 3.0 ± 1.1 ng/ml; P = 0.005; I(2): 80%) and elevated levels were significantly associated with increased mortality risk (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.04–1.68, P < 0.05; I(2): 57%). CONCLUSIONS: sST2 significantly predicts disease severity and mortality in cardiovascular disease and is a good predictor of mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease and chronic heart failure.