Cargando…

GPs’ views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback: a qualitative study

PURPOSE: The first aim of this qualitative study was to identify general practitioners’ (GPs’) views on depression screening combined with GP-targeted feedback in primary care. The second aim was to determine the needs and preferences of GPs with respect to GP-targeted feedback to enhance the effica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braunschneider, Lea-Elena, Lehmann, Marco, Magaard, Julia Luise, Seeralan, Tharanya, Marx, Gabriella, Eisele, Marion, Scherer, Martin, Löwe, Bernd, Kohlmann, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33249538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02703-2
_version_ 1784586311418511360
author Braunschneider, Lea-Elena
Lehmann, Marco
Magaard, Julia Luise
Seeralan, Tharanya
Marx, Gabriella
Eisele, Marion
Scherer, Martin
Löwe, Bernd
Kohlmann, Sebastian
author_facet Braunschneider, Lea-Elena
Lehmann, Marco
Magaard, Julia Luise
Seeralan, Tharanya
Marx, Gabriella
Eisele, Marion
Scherer, Martin
Löwe, Bernd
Kohlmann, Sebastian
author_sort Braunschneider, Lea-Elena
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The first aim of this qualitative study was to identify general practitioners’ (GPs’) views on depression screening combined with GP-targeted feedback in primary care. The second aim was to determine the needs and preferences of GPs with respect to GP-targeted feedback to enhance the efficacy of depression screening. METHODS: A semistructured qualitative interview was conducted with officially registered GPs in Hamburg (Germany). Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. An inductive approach was used to code the transcripts. RESULTS: Nine GPs (27 to 70 years; 5 male) from Hamburg, Germany, participated. Regarding depression screening combined with GP-targeted feedback, five thematic groups were identified: application of screening; screening and patient–physician relationships; GPs’ attitudes towards screening; benefits and concerns related to screening; and GPs’ needs and preferences regarding feedback. While the negative aspects of screening can be described in rather general terms (e.g., screening determines the mental health competence, screening threatens the doctor–patient relationship, revealing questions harm the patients), its advantages were very specific (e.g., promoting the identification of undetected cases, relief of the daily workload, wider communication channel to reach more patients). Standardized GP-targeted feedback of the screening results was perceived as helpful and purposeful. GPs preferred feedback materials that eased their clinical workload (e.g., short text with visuals, pictures, or images). CONCLUSION: Addressing GPs’ needs is essential when implementing depression screening tools in clinical practice. To overcome prejudices and enhance the efficacy of screening, further education for GPs on the purpose and application on depression screening may be needed. Standardized GP-targeted feedback in combination with depression screening could be the missing link to improve the detection of depression in primary care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02703-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8528735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85287352021-11-04 GPs’ views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback: a qualitative study Braunschneider, Lea-Elena Lehmann, Marco Magaard, Julia Luise Seeralan, Tharanya Marx, Gabriella Eisele, Marion Scherer, Martin Löwe, Bernd Kohlmann, Sebastian Qual Life Res Special Section: Feedback Tools PURPOSE: The first aim of this qualitative study was to identify general practitioners’ (GPs’) views on depression screening combined with GP-targeted feedback in primary care. The second aim was to determine the needs and preferences of GPs with respect to GP-targeted feedback to enhance the efficacy of depression screening. METHODS: A semistructured qualitative interview was conducted with officially registered GPs in Hamburg (Germany). Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. An inductive approach was used to code the transcripts. RESULTS: Nine GPs (27 to 70 years; 5 male) from Hamburg, Germany, participated. Regarding depression screening combined with GP-targeted feedback, five thematic groups were identified: application of screening; screening and patient–physician relationships; GPs’ attitudes towards screening; benefits and concerns related to screening; and GPs’ needs and preferences regarding feedback. While the negative aspects of screening can be described in rather general terms (e.g., screening determines the mental health competence, screening threatens the doctor–patient relationship, revealing questions harm the patients), its advantages were very specific (e.g., promoting the identification of undetected cases, relief of the daily workload, wider communication channel to reach more patients). Standardized GP-targeted feedback of the screening results was perceived as helpful and purposeful. GPs preferred feedback materials that eased their clinical workload (e.g., short text with visuals, pictures, or images). CONCLUSION: Addressing GPs’ needs is essential when implementing depression screening tools in clinical practice. To overcome prejudices and enhance the efficacy of screening, further education for GPs on the purpose and application on depression screening may be needed. Standardized GP-targeted feedback in combination with depression screening could be the missing link to improve the detection of depression in primary care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02703-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-11-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8528735/ /pubmed/33249538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02703-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Special Section: Feedback Tools
Braunschneider, Lea-Elena
Lehmann, Marco
Magaard, Julia Luise
Seeralan, Tharanya
Marx, Gabriella
Eisele, Marion
Scherer, Martin
Löwe, Bernd
Kohlmann, Sebastian
GPs’ views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback: a qualitative study
title GPs’ views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback: a qualitative study
title_full GPs’ views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback: a qualitative study
title_fullStr GPs’ views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed GPs’ views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback: a qualitative study
title_short GPs’ views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback: a qualitative study
title_sort gps’ views on the use of depression screening and gp-targeted feedback: a qualitative study
topic Special Section: Feedback Tools
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33249538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02703-2
work_keys_str_mv AT braunschneiderleaelena gpsviewsontheuseofdepressionscreeningandgptargetedfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT lehmannmarco gpsviewsontheuseofdepressionscreeningandgptargetedfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT magaardjulialuise gpsviewsontheuseofdepressionscreeningandgptargetedfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT seeralantharanya gpsviewsontheuseofdepressionscreeningandgptargetedfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT marxgabriella gpsviewsontheuseofdepressionscreeningandgptargetedfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT eiselemarion gpsviewsontheuseofdepressionscreeningandgptargetedfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT scherermartin gpsviewsontheuseofdepressionscreeningandgptargetedfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT lowebernd gpsviewsontheuseofdepressionscreeningandgptargetedfeedbackaqualitativestudy
AT kohlmannsebastian gpsviewsontheuseofdepressionscreeningandgptargetedfeedbackaqualitativestudy