Cargando…
A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
PURPOSE: The KLIK Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) portal is an evidence-based intervention implemented in clinical practice in > 25 Dutch hospitals for patients (children and adults) who regularly visit the outpatient clinic. Implementation science frameworks can be used to understand why...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02586-3 |
_version_ | 1784586315483840512 |
---|---|
author | van Oers, Hedy A. Teela, Lorynn Schepers, Sasja A. Grootenhuis, Martha A. Haverman, Lotte |
author_facet | van Oers, Hedy A. Teela, Lorynn Schepers, Sasja A. Grootenhuis, Martha A. Haverman, Lotte |
author_sort | van Oers, Hedy A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The KLIK Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) portal is an evidence-based intervention implemented in clinical practice in > 25 Dutch hospitals for patients (children and adults) who regularly visit the outpatient clinic. Implementation science frameworks can be used to understand why implementation succeeded or failed, to structure barriers and enablers, and to develop implementation strategies to overcome barriers. This paper aimed to (A) retrospectively describe determinants of successful KLIK PROM implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and (B) identify current barriers and match implementation strategies. METHODS: (A) The KLIK implementation process was described retrospectively based on literature and experience, using the 39 CFIR constructs organized in five general domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and implementation process. (B) The CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Implementation Strategy Matching tool identified current barriers in the KLIK implementation and matched implementation strategies that addressed the identified barriers. RESULTS: (A) The most prominent determinants of successful KLIK PROM implementation lie in the following CFIR domains: intervention characteristics (e.g., easy to use), characteristics of individuals (e.g., motivation), and process of implementation (e.g., support). (B) 13 CFIR constructs were identified as current barriers for implementing the KLIK PROM portal. The highest overall advised ERIC strategy for the specific KLIK barriers was to identify and prepare champions. CONCLUSION: Using an implementation science framework, e.g., CFIR, is recommended for groups starting to use PROMs in clinical care as it offers a structured approach and provides insight into possible enablers and barriers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02586-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8528752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85287522021-11-04 A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) van Oers, Hedy A. Teela, Lorynn Schepers, Sasja A. Grootenhuis, Martha A. Haverman, Lotte Qual Life Res Special Section: Feedback Tools PURPOSE: The KLIK Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) portal is an evidence-based intervention implemented in clinical practice in > 25 Dutch hospitals for patients (children and adults) who regularly visit the outpatient clinic. Implementation science frameworks can be used to understand why implementation succeeded or failed, to structure barriers and enablers, and to develop implementation strategies to overcome barriers. This paper aimed to (A) retrospectively describe determinants of successful KLIK PROM implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and (B) identify current barriers and match implementation strategies. METHODS: (A) The KLIK implementation process was described retrospectively based on literature and experience, using the 39 CFIR constructs organized in five general domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and implementation process. (B) The CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Implementation Strategy Matching tool identified current barriers in the KLIK implementation and matched implementation strategies that addressed the identified barriers. RESULTS: (A) The most prominent determinants of successful KLIK PROM implementation lie in the following CFIR domains: intervention characteristics (e.g., easy to use), characteristics of individuals (e.g., motivation), and process of implementation (e.g., support). (B) 13 CFIR constructs were identified as current barriers for implementing the KLIK PROM portal. The highest overall advised ERIC strategy for the specific KLIK barriers was to identify and prepare champions. CONCLUSION: Using an implementation science framework, e.g., CFIR, is recommended for groups starting to use PROMs in clinical care as it offers a structured approach and provides insight into possible enablers and barriers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02586-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-08-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8528752/ /pubmed/32803626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02586-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Special Section: Feedback Tools van Oers, Hedy A. Teela, Lorynn Schepers, Sasja A. Grootenhuis, Martha A. Haverman, Lotte A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) |
title | A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) |
title_full | A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) |
title_fullStr | A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) |
title_short | A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) |
title_sort | retrospective assessment of the klik prom portal implementation using the consolidated framework for implementation research (cfir) |
topic | Special Section: Feedback Tools |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02586-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanoershedya aretrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir AT teelalorynn aretrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir AT scheperssasjaa aretrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir AT grootenhuismarthaa aretrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir AT havermanlotte aretrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir AT aretrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir AT vanoershedya retrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir AT teelalorynn retrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir AT scheperssasjaa retrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir AT grootenhuismarthaa retrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir AT havermanlotte retrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir AT retrospectiveassessmentoftheklikpromportalimplementationusingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchcfir |