Cargando…
Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay
The bioassay based on the bioluminescence inhibition of the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri has been the most widely used test for the assessment of airborne particulate matter ecotoxicity. Most studies available use an extract of the solid sample, either made with water or organic solvents. As an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-00927-w |
_version_ | 1784586326056632320 |
---|---|
author | Kováts, Nora Hubai, Katalin Sainnokhoi, Tsend-Ayush Hoffer, András Teke, Gábor |
author_facet | Kováts, Nora Hubai, Katalin Sainnokhoi, Tsend-Ayush Hoffer, András Teke, Gábor |
author_sort | Kováts, Nora |
collection | PubMed |
description | The bioassay based on the bioluminescence inhibition of the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri has been the most widely used test for the assessment of airborne particulate matter ecotoxicity. Most studies available use an extract of the solid sample, either made with water or organic solvents. As an alternative, a whole-aerosol test is also available where test bacteria are in actual contact with contaminated particles. In our study, different extraction procedures were compared to this direct contact test based on the V. fischeri assay and analytical measurements. The lowest PAH content and the highest EC(50) were determined in water extract, while the highest PAH amount and lowest EC(50) were measured in dichloromethane, hexane, and dimethyl-sulphoxide extracts. EC(50) of the direct contact test was comparable to that of the methanol extract. Our results suggest that the sensitivity of the direct contact test equals to that of extraction procedures using organic solvents, moreover, it is mimicking an environmentally realistic exposure route. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8528798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85287982021-11-04 Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay Kováts, Nora Hubai, Katalin Sainnokhoi, Tsend-Ayush Hoffer, András Teke, Gábor Environ Geochem Health Original Paper The bioassay based on the bioluminescence inhibition of the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri has been the most widely used test for the assessment of airborne particulate matter ecotoxicity. Most studies available use an extract of the solid sample, either made with water or organic solvents. As an alternative, a whole-aerosol test is also available where test bacteria are in actual contact with contaminated particles. In our study, different extraction procedures were compared to this direct contact test based on the V. fischeri assay and analytical measurements. The lowest PAH content and the highest EC(50) were determined in water extract, while the highest PAH amount and lowest EC(50) were measured in dichloromethane, hexane, and dimethyl-sulphoxide extracts. EC(50) of the direct contact test was comparable to that of the methanol extract. Our results suggest that the sensitivity of the direct contact test equals to that of extraction procedures using organic solvents, moreover, it is mimicking an environmentally realistic exposure route. Springer Netherlands 2021-04-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8528798/ /pubmed/33864174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-00927-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kováts, Nora Hubai, Katalin Sainnokhoi, Tsend-Ayush Hoffer, András Teke, Gábor Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay |
title | Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay |
title_full | Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay |
title_fullStr | Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay |
title_full_unstemmed | Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay |
title_short | Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay |
title_sort | ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the vibrio fischeri assay |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-00927-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kovatsnora ecotoxicitytestingofairborneparticulatemattercomparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesforthevibriofischeriassay AT hubaikatalin ecotoxicitytestingofairborneparticulatemattercomparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesforthevibriofischeriassay AT sainnokhoitsendayush ecotoxicitytestingofairborneparticulatemattercomparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesforthevibriofischeriassay AT hofferandras ecotoxicitytestingofairborneparticulatemattercomparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesforthevibriofischeriassay AT tekegabor ecotoxicitytestingofairborneparticulatemattercomparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesforthevibriofischeriassay |