Cargando…

Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay

The bioassay based on the bioluminescence inhibition of the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri has been the most widely used test for the assessment of airborne particulate matter ecotoxicity. Most studies available use an extract of the solid sample, either made with water or organic solvents. As an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kováts, Nora, Hubai, Katalin, Sainnokhoi, Tsend-Ayush, Hoffer, András, Teke, Gábor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-00927-w
_version_ 1784586326056632320
author Kováts, Nora
Hubai, Katalin
Sainnokhoi, Tsend-Ayush
Hoffer, András
Teke, Gábor
author_facet Kováts, Nora
Hubai, Katalin
Sainnokhoi, Tsend-Ayush
Hoffer, András
Teke, Gábor
author_sort Kováts, Nora
collection PubMed
description The bioassay based on the bioluminescence inhibition of the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri has been the most widely used test for the assessment of airborne particulate matter ecotoxicity. Most studies available use an extract of the solid sample, either made with water or organic solvents. As an alternative, a whole-aerosol test is also available where test bacteria are in actual contact with contaminated particles. In our study, different extraction procedures were compared to this direct contact test based on the V. fischeri assay and analytical measurements. The lowest PAH content and the highest EC(50) were determined in water extract, while the highest PAH amount and lowest EC(50) were measured in dichloromethane, hexane, and dimethyl-sulphoxide extracts. EC(50) of the direct contact test was comparable to that of the methanol extract. Our results suggest that the sensitivity of the direct contact test equals to that of extraction procedures using organic solvents, moreover, it is mimicking an environmentally realistic exposure route.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8528798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85287982021-11-04 Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay Kováts, Nora Hubai, Katalin Sainnokhoi, Tsend-Ayush Hoffer, András Teke, Gábor Environ Geochem Health Original Paper The bioassay based on the bioluminescence inhibition of the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri has been the most widely used test for the assessment of airborne particulate matter ecotoxicity. Most studies available use an extract of the solid sample, either made with water or organic solvents. As an alternative, a whole-aerosol test is also available where test bacteria are in actual contact with contaminated particles. In our study, different extraction procedures were compared to this direct contact test based on the V. fischeri assay and analytical measurements. The lowest PAH content and the highest EC(50) were determined in water extract, while the highest PAH amount and lowest EC(50) were measured in dichloromethane, hexane, and dimethyl-sulphoxide extracts. EC(50) of the direct contact test was comparable to that of the methanol extract. Our results suggest that the sensitivity of the direct contact test equals to that of extraction procedures using organic solvents, moreover, it is mimicking an environmentally realistic exposure route. Springer Netherlands 2021-04-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8528798/ /pubmed/33864174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-00927-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kováts, Nora
Hubai, Katalin
Sainnokhoi, Tsend-Ayush
Hoffer, András
Teke, Gábor
Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay
title Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay
title_full Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay
title_fullStr Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay
title_full_unstemmed Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay
title_short Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay
title_sort ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter—comparison of sample preparation techniques for the vibrio fischeri assay
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-00927-w
work_keys_str_mv AT kovatsnora ecotoxicitytestingofairborneparticulatemattercomparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesforthevibriofischeriassay
AT hubaikatalin ecotoxicitytestingofairborneparticulatemattercomparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesforthevibriofischeriassay
AT sainnokhoitsendayush ecotoxicitytestingofairborneparticulatemattercomparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesforthevibriofischeriassay
AT hofferandras ecotoxicitytestingofairborneparticulatemattercomparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesforthevibriofischeriassay
AT tekegabor ecotoxicitytestingofairborneparticulatemattercomparisonofsamplepreparationtechniquesforthevibriofischeriassay