Cargando…

Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin

BACKGROUND: In breast cancer, painful bone metastases are common. Local radiotherapy is the standard treatment of painful bone metastases. Pain control and overall response rateswere low in radiotherapy alone. The objectives of this study were to compare the safety and efficacy of external beam radi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Shimaa, M.Kamal, Shereen, Salah, Tareq, Fawzy Sedik, Mayada, Youssief, Ayatallah A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100395
_version_ 1784586393952976896
author Ahmed, Shimaa
M.Kamal, Shereen
Salah, Tareq
Fawzy Sedik, Mayada
Youssief, Ayatallah A.
author_facet Ahmed, Shimaa
M.Kamal, Shereen
Salah, Tareq
Fawzy Sedik, Mayada
Youssief, Ayatallah A.
author_sort Ahmed, Shimaa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In breast cancer, painful bone metastases are common. Local radiotherapy is the standard treatment of painful bone metastases. Pain control and overall response rateswere low in radiotherapy alone. The objectives of this study were to compare the safety and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine vs. external beam radiotherapy alone in pain control of painful bone metastases in breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients with painful bone metastases from breast cancer participated in this prospective study. We randomized the patients into two groups: group A treated with radiotherapy 30 Gy in 10 fractions and group B treated with capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) every 12 hrs. concurrently with the same radiotherapy dose. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding early treatment toxicity. Most of the toxicity was gastrointestinal (diarrhea and nausea) and mild (grade I or II). The median pain score decreased from week one, and there was a marked response at week4. The difference in median pain score between both groups was statistically significant with p-value = 0.045. The median analgesic score in both groups was statistically significant with a p-value = 0.032 at week 12. A complete response to pain at week 4 was 19% and 42.9% in groups A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiation in painful bone metastases from breast cancer origin was tolerable and safe; it had a higher overall response rate and pain palliation than radiotherapy alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8529095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85290952021-10-27 Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin Ahmed, Shimaa M.Kamal, Shereen Salah, Tareq Fawzy Sedik, Mayada Youssief, Ayatallah A. J Bone Oncol Research Paper BACKGROUND: In breast cancer, painful bone metastases are common. Local radiotherapy is the standard treatment of painful bone metastases. Pain control and overall response rateswere low in radiotherapy alone. The objectives of this study were to compare the safety and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine vs. external beam radiotherapy alone in pain control of painful bone metastases in breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients with painful bone metastases from breast cancer participated in this prospective study. We randomized the patients into two groups: group A treated with radiotherapy 30 Gy in 10 fractions and group B treated with capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) every 12 hrs. concurrently with the same radiotherapy dose. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding early treatment toxicity. Most of the toxicity was gastrointestinal (diarrhea and nausea) and mild (grade I or II). The median pain score decreased from week one, and there was a marked response at week4. The difference in median pain score between both groups was statistically significant with p-value = 0.045. The median analgesic score in both groups was statistically significant with a p-value = 0.032 at week 12. A complete response to pain at week 4 was 19% and 42.9% in groups A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiation in painful bone metastases from breast cancer origin was tolerable and safe; it had a higher overall response rate and pain palliation than radiotherapy alone. Elsevier 2021-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8529095/ /pubmed/34712554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100395 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Ahmed, Shimaa
M.Kamal, Shereen
Salah, Tareq
Fawzy Sedik, Mayada
Youssief, Ayatallah A.
Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin
title Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin
title_full Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin
title_fullStr Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin
title_short Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin
title_sort concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100395
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedshimaa concurrentcapecitabinewithexternalbeamradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneinpainfulbonemetastasisofbreastcancerorigin
AT mkamalshereen concurrentcapecitabinewithexternalbeamradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneinpainfulbonemetastasisofbreastcancerorigin
AT salahtareq concurrentcapecitabinewithexternalbeamradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneinpainfulbonemetastasisofbreastcancerorigin
AT fawzysedikmayada concurrentcapecitabinewithexternalbeamradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneinpainfulbonemetastasisofbreastcancerorigin
AT youssiefayatallaha concurrentcapecitabinewithexternalbeamradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneinpainfulbonemetastasisofbreastcancerorigin