Cargando…
Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin
BACKGROUND: In breast cancer, painful bone metastases are common. Local radiotherapy is the standard treatment of painful bone metastases. Pain control and overall response rateswere low in radiotherapy alone. The objectives of this study were to compare the safety and efficacy of external beam radi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100395 |
_version_ | 1784586393952976896 |
---|---|
author | Ahmed, Shimaa M.Kamal, Shereen Salah, Tareq Fawzy Sedik, Mayada Youssief, Ayatallah A. |
author_facet | Ahmed, Shimaa M.Kamal, Shereen Salah, Tareq Fawzy Sedik, Mayada Youssief, Ayatallah A. |
author_sort | Ahmed, Shimaa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In breast cancer, painful bone metastases are common. Local radiotherapy is the standard treatment of painful bone metastases. Pain control and overall response rateswere low in radiotherapy alone. The objectives of this study were to compare the safety and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine vs. external beam radiotherapy alone in pain control of painful bone metastases in breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients with painful bone metastases from breast cancer participated in this prospective study. We randomized the patients into two groups: group A treated with radiotherapy 30 Gy in 10 fractions and group B treated with capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) every 12 hrs. concurrently with the same radiotherapy dose. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding early treatment toxicity. Most of the toxicity was gastrointestinal (diarrhea and nausea) and mild (grade I or II). The median pain score decreased from week one, and there was a marked response at week4. The difference in median pain score between both groups was statistically significant with p-value = 0.045. The median analgesic score in both groups was statistically significant with a p-value = 0.032 at week 12. A complete response to pain at week 4 was 19% and 42.9% in groups A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiation in painful bone metastases from breast cancer origin was tolerable and safe; it had a higher overall response rate and pain palliation than radiotherapy alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8529095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85290952021-10-27 Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin Ahmed, Shimaa M.Kamal, Shereen Salah, Tareq Fawzy Sedik, Mayada Youssief, Ayatallah A. J Bone Oncol Research Paper BACKGROUND: In breast cancer, painful bone metastases are common. Local radiotherapy is the standard treatment of painful bone metastases. Pain control and overall response rateswere low in radiotherapy alone. The objectives of this study were to compare the safety and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine vs. external beam radiotherapy alone in pain control of painful bone metastases in breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients with painful bone metastases from breast cancer participated in this prospective study. We randomized the patients into two groups: group A treated with radiotherapy 30 Gy in 10 fractions and group B treated with capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) every 12 hrs. concurrently with the same radiotherapy dose. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding early treatment toxicity. Most of the toxicity was gastrointestinal (diarrhea and nausea) and mild (grade I or II). The median pain score decreased from week one, and there was a marked response at week4. The difference in median pain score between both groups was statistically significant with p-value = 0.045. The median analgesic score in both groups was statistically significant with a p-value = 0.032 at week 12. A complete response to pain at week 4 was 19% and 42.9% in groups A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiation in painful bone metastases from breast cancer origin was tolerable and safe; it had a higher overall response rate and pain palliation than radiotherapy alone. Elsevier 2021-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8529095/ /pubmed/34712554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100395 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Ahmed, Shimaa M.Kamal, Shereen Salah, Tareq Fawzy Sedik, Mayada Youssief, Ayatallah A. Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin |
title | Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin |
title_full | Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin |
title_fullStr | Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin |
title_full_unstemmed | Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin |
title_short | Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin |
title_sort | concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmedshimaa concurrentcapecitabinewithexternalbeamradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneinpainfulbonemetastasisofbreastcancerorigin AT mkamalshereen concurrentcapecitabinewithexternalbeamradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneinpainfulbonemetastasisofbreastcancerorigin AT salahtareq concurrentcapecitabinewithexternalbeamradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneinpainfulbonemetastasisofbreastcancerorigin AT fawzysedikmayada concurrentcapecitabinewithexternalbeamradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneinpainfulbonemetastasisofbreastcancerorigin AT youssiefayatallaha concurrentcapecitabinewithexternalbeamradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneinpainfulbonemetastasisofbreastcancerorigin |