Cargando…
Meta‐analysis of the diagnostic value of exosomal miR‐21 as a biomarker for the prediction of cancer
BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of cancer is still the most effective method to increase survival and therapeutically effective patient management. Accumulating studies had exploited exosomes as an indicator for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. In addition to exosomes, exosome‐derived miRs are wid...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34492742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23956 |
_version_ | 1784586404643209216 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Fanglan Mao, Haifei Chai, Shiquan Mao, Haifeng |
author_facet | Liu, Fanglan Mao, Haifei Chai, Shiquan Mao, Haifeng |
author_sort | Liu, Fanglan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of cancer is still the most effective method to increase survival and therapeutically effective patient management. Accumulating studies had exploited exosomes as an indicator for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. In addition to exosomes, exosome‐derived miRs are widely investigated as a novel biomarker for diagnosis in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to clarify the diagnostic value of ex‐miR‐21 in cancer. METHODS: Databases were searched for eligible studies up to June, 2021. Studies included in this meta‐analysis were reviewed and selected independently by two authors. The data of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) of exosomal miR‐21 as a diagnostic biomarker were extracted and calculated. Quality assessment was conducted by using the QUADAS‐2 tool. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were included in the systematic analysis and meta‐analysis. The pooled results of sensitivity, specificity, PLR/NLR, DOR, and area under the curve were 76% (95%CI, 0.70–0.81), 82% (0.77–0.87), 4.3 (3.1–6.0), 0.29 (0.22–0.38), 15 (8–26), and 0.86 (0.83–0.89), respectively. Sensitivity analysis and Deeks' funnel plot indicated that results remained unchanged and had no publication bias. For the subgroup analysis, it was showed that ex‐miR‐21 had a superior diagnostic accuracy on identifying PC. CONCLUSION: Exosomal microRNA‐21 can serve as an effective and widely used diagnostic biomarker for cancer, especially in PC. The using field of exosomes and exosome‐derived miR can further extend the prognosis and therapeutic management. Standardized isolation of exosomes and miRNA‐21 should be developed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8529139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85291392021-10-27 Meta‐analysis of the diagnostic value of exosomal miR‐21 as a biomarker for the prediction of cancer Liu, Fanglan Mao, Haifei Chai, Shiquan Mao, Haifeng J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of cancer is still the most effective method to increase survival and therapeutically effective patient management. Accumulating studies had exploited exosomes as an indicator for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. In addition to exosomes, exosome‐derived miRs are widely investigated as a novel biomarker for diagnosis in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to clarify the diagnostic value of ex‐miR‐21 in cancer. METHODS: Databases were searched for eligible studies up to June, 2021. Studies included in this meta‐analysis were reviewed and selected independently by two authors. The data of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) of exosomal miR‐21 as a diagnostic biomarker were extracted and calculated. Quality assessment was conducted by using the QUADAS‐2 tool. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were included in the systematic analysis and meta‐analysis. The pooled results of sensitivity, specificity, PLR/NLR, DOR, and area under the curve were 76% (95%CI, 0.70–0.81), 82% (0.77–0.87), 4.3 (3.1–6.0), 0.29 (0.22–0.38), 15 (8–26), and 0.86 (0.83–0.89), respectively. Sensitivity analysis and Deeks' funnel plot indicated that results remained unchanged and had no publication bias. For the subgroup analysis, it was showed that ex‐miR‐21 had a superior diagnostic accuracy on identifying PC. CONCLUSION: Exosomal microRNA‐21 can serve as an effective and widely used diagnostic biomarker for cancer, especially in PC. The using field of exosomes and exosome‐derived miR can further extend the prognosis and therapeutic management. Standardized isolation of exosomes and miRNA‐21 should be developed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8529139/ /pubmed/34492742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23956 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Liu, Fanglan Mao, Haifei Chai, Shiquan Mao, Haifeng Meta‐analysis of the diagnostic value of exosomal miR‐21 as a biomarker for the prediction of cancer |
title | Meta‐analysis of the diagnostic value of exosomal miR‐21 as a biomarker for the prediction of cancer |
title_full | Meta‐analysis of the diagnostic value of exosomal miR‐21 as a biomarker for the prediction of cancer |
title_fullStr | Meta‐analysis of the diagnostic value of exosomal miR‐21 as a biomarker for the prediction of cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta‐analysis of the diagnostic value of exosomal miR‐21 as a biomarker for the prediction of cancer |
title_short | Meta‐analysis of the diagnostic value of exosomal miR‐21 as a biomarker for the prediction of cancer |
title_sort | meta‐analysis of the diagnostic value of exosomal mir‐21 as a biomarker for the prediction of cancer |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34492742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23956 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liufanglan metaanalysisofthediagnosticvalueofexosomalmir21asabiomarkerforthepredictionofcancer AT maohaifei metaanalysisofthediagnosticvalueofexosomalmir21asabiomarkerforthepredictionofcancer AT chaishiquan metaanalysisofthediagnosticvalueofexosomalmir21asabiomarkerforthepredictionofcancer AT maohaifeng metaanalysisofthediagnosticvalueofexosomalmir21asabiomarkerforthepredictionofcancer |