Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules to Predict Hospitalisation in Children with Lower Respiratory Infection in Primary Care and their Validation in a New Cohort

Background: Our goal was to identify existing clinical prediction rules for predicting hospitalisation due to lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in children in primary care, guiding antibiotic therapy. A validation of these rules was then performed in a novel cohort of children presenting to p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wildes, Dermot M, Chisale, Master, Drew, Richard J, Harrington, Peter, Watson, Chris J, Ledwidge, Mark T, Gallagher, Joe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101164
_version_ 1784586419233095680
author Wildes, Dermot M
Chisale, Master
Drew, Richard J
Harrington, Peter
Watson, Chris J
Ledwidge, Mark T
Gallagher, Joe
author_facet Wildes, Dermot M
Chisale, Master
Drew, Richard J
Harrington, Peter
Watson, Chris J
Ledwidge, Mark T
Gallagher, Joe
author_sort Wildes, Dermot M
collection PubMed
description Background: Our goal was to identify existing clinical prediction rules for predicting hospitalisation due to lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in children in primary care, guiding antibiotic therapy. A validation of these rules was then performed in a novel cohort of children presenting to primary care in Malawi with World Health Organisation clinically defined pneumonia. Methods: MEDLINE & EMBASE databases were searched for studies on the development, validation and clinical impact of clinical prediction models for hospitalisation in children with lower respiratory tract infection between January 1(st)1946-June 30(th) 2021. Two reviewers screened all abstracts and titles independently. The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses guidelines. The BIOTOPE cohort (BIOmarkers TO diagnose PnEumonia) recruited children aged 2-59 months with WHO-defined pneumonia from two primary care facilities in Mzuzu, Malawi. Validation of identified rules was undertaken in this cohort. Findings: 1023 abstracts were identified. Following the removal of duplicates, a review of 989 abstracts was conducted leading to the identification of one eligible model. The CHARMS checklist for prediction modelling studies was utilized for evaluation. The area under the curve (AUC) of the STARWAVe rule for hospitalisation in BIOTOPE was found to be 0.80 (95% C.I of 0.75-0.85). The AUC of STARWAVe for a confirmed diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia was 0.39 (95% C.I 0.25-0.54). Interpretation: This review highlights the lack of clinical prediction rules in this area. The STARWAVe rule identified was useful in predicting hospitalisation from bacterial infection as defined. However, in the absence of a gold standard indicator for bacterial LRTI, this is a reasonable surrogate and could lead to reductions in antibiotic prescription rates, should clinical impact studies prove its utility. Further work to determine the clinical impact of STARWAVe and to identify diagnostic tests for bacterial LRTI in primary care is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8529204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85292042021-10-27 A Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules to Predict Hospitalisation in Children with Lower Respiratory Infection in Primary Care and their Validation in a New Cohort Wildes, Dermot M Chisale, Master Drew, Richard J Harrington, Peter Watson, Chris J Ledwidge, Mark T Gallagher, Joe EClinicalMedicine Original Research Background: Our goal was to identify existing clinical prediction rules for predicting hospitalisation due to lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in children in primary care, guiding antibiotic therapy. A validation of these rules was then performed in a novel cohort of children presenting to primary care in Malawi with World Health Organisation clinically defined pneumonia. Methods: MEDLINE & EMBASE databases were searched for studies on the development, validation and clinical impact of clinical prediction models for hospitalisation in children with lower respiratory tract infection between January 1(st)1946-June 30(th) 2021. Two reviewers screened all abstracts and titles independently. The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses guidelines. The BIOTOPE cohort (BIOmarkers TO diagnose PnEumonia) recruited children aged 2-59 months with WHO-defined pneumonia from two primary care facilities in Mzuzu, Malawi. Validation of identified rules was undertaken in this cohort. Findings: 1023 abstracts were identified. Following the removal of duplicates, a review of 989 abstracts was conducted leading to the identification of one eligible model. The CHARMS checklist for prediction modelling studies was utilized for evaluation. The area under the curve (AUC) of the STARWAVe rule for hospitalisation in BIOTOPE was found to be 0.80 (95% C.I of 0.75-0.85). The AUC of STARWAVe for a confirmed diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia was 0.39 (95% C.I 0.25-0.54). Interpretation: This review highlights the lack of clinical prediction rules in this area. The STARWAVe rule identified was useful in predicting hospitalisation from bacterial infection as defined. However, in the absence of a gold standard indicator for bacterial LRTI, this is a reasonable surrogate and could lead to reductions in antibiotic prescription rates, should clinical impact studies prove its utility. Further work to determine the clinical impact of STARWAVe and to identify diagnostic tests for bacterial LRTI in primary care is required. Elsevier 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8529204/ /pubmed/34712930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101164 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Wildes, Dermot M
Chisale, Master
Drew, Richard J
Harrington, Peter
Watson, Chris J
Ledwidge, Mark T
Gallagher, Joe
A Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules to Predict Hospitalisation in Children with Lower Respiratory Infection in Primary Care and their Validation in a New Cohort
title A Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules to Predict Hospitalisation in Children with Lower Respiratory Infection in Primary Care and their Validation in a New Cohort
title_full A Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules to Predict Hospitalisation in Children with Lower Respiratory Infection in Primary Care and their Validation in a New Cohort
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules to Predict Hospitalisation in Children with Lower Respiratory Infection in Primary Care and their Validation in a New Cohort
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules to Predict Hospitalisation in Children with Lower Respiratory Infection in Primary Care and their Validation in a New Cohort
title_short A Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules to Predict Hospitalisation in Children with Lower Respiratory Infection in Primary Care and their Validation in a New Cohort
title_sort systematic review of clinical prediction rules to predict hospitalisation in children with lower respiratory infection in primary care and their validation in a new cohort
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101164
work_keys_str_mv AT wildesdermotm asystematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT chisalemaster asystematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT drewrichardj asystematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT harringtonpeter asystematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT watsonchrisj asystematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT ledwidgemarkt asystematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT gallagherjoe asystematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT wildesdermotm systematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT chisalemaster systematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT drewrichardj systematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT harringtonpeter systematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT watsonchrisj systematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT ledwidgemarkt systematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort
AT gallagherjoe systematicreviewofclinicalpredictionrulestopredicthospitalisationinchildrenwithlowerrespiratoryinfectioninprimarycareandtheirvalidationinanewcohort