Cargando…

Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes

Superionic solid electrolytes have widespread use in energy devices, but the fundamental motivations for fast ion conduction are often elusive. In this Perspective, we draw upon atomistic simulations of a wide range of superionic conductors to illustrate some ways frustration can lower diffusion cat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Brandon C., Varley, Joel B., Kweon, Kyoung E., Shea, Patrick, Hall, Alex T., Grieder, Andrew, Ward, Michael, Aguirre, Vincent P., Rigling, Dylan, Lopez Ventura, Eduardo, Stancill, Chimara, Adelstein, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34628943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0467
_version_ 1784586465884241920
author Wood, Brandon C.
Varley, Joel B.
Kweon, Kyoung E.
Shea, Patrick
Hall, Alex T.
Grieder, Andrew
Ward, Michael
Aguirre, Vincent P.
Rigling, Dylan
Lopez Ventura, Eduardo
Stancill, Chimara
Adelstein, Nicole
author_facet Wood, Brandon C.
Varley, Joel B.
Kweon, Kyoung E.
Shea, Patrick
Hall, Alex T.
Grieder, Andrew
Ward, Michael
Aguirre, Vincent P.
Rigling, Dylan
Lopez Ventura, Eduardo
Stancill, Chimara
Adelstein, Nicole
author_sort Wood, Brandon C.
collection PubMed
description Superionic solid electrolytes have widespread use in energy devices, but the fundamental motivations for fast ion conduction are often elusive. In this Perspective, we draw upon atomistic simulations of a wide range of superionic conductors to illustrate some ways frustration can lower diffusion cation barriers in solids. Based on our studies of halides, oxides, sulfides and hydroborates and a survey of published reports, we classify three types of frustration that create competition between different local atomic preferences, thereby flattening the diffusive energy landscape. These include chemical frustration, which derives from competing factors in the anion–cation interaction; structural frustration, which arises from lattice arrangements that induce site distortion or prevent cation ordering; and dynamical frustration, which is associated with temporary fluctuations in the energy landscape due to anion reorientation or cation reconfiguration. For each class of frustration, we provide detailed simulation analyses of various materials to show how ion mobility is facilitated, resulting in stabilizing factors that are both entropic and enthalpic in origin. We propose the use of these categories as a general construct for classifying frustration in superionic conductors and discuss implications for future development of suitable descriptors and improvement strategies. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Understanding fast-ion conduction in solid electrolytes’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8529417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85294172022-02-02 Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes Wood, Brandon C. Varley, Joel B. Kweon, Kyoung E. Shea, Patrick Hall, Alex T. Grieder, Andrew Ward, Michael Aguirre, Vincent P. Rigling, Dylan Lopez Ventura, Eduardo Stancill, Chimara Adelstein, Nicole Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Articles Superionic solid electrolytes have widespread use in energy devices, but the fundamental motivations for fast ion conduction are often elusive. In this Perspective, we draw upon atomistic simulations of a wide range of superionic conductors to illustrate some ways frustration can lower diffusion cation barriers in solids. Based on our studies of halides, oxides, sulfides and hydroborates and a survey of published reports, we classify three types of frustration that create competition between different local atomic preferences, thereby flattening the diffusive energy landscape. These include chemical frustration, which derives from competing factors in the anion–cation interaction; structural frustration, which arises from lattice arrangements that induce site distortion or prevent cation ordering; and dynamical frustration, which is associated with temporary fluctuations in the energy landscape due to anion reorientation or cation reconfiguration. For each class of frustration, we provide detailed simulation analyses of various materials to show how ion mobility is facilitated, resulting in stabilizing factors that are both entropic and enthalpic in origin. We propose the use of these categories as a general construct for classifying frustration in superionic conductors and discuss implications for future development of suitable descriptors and improvement strategies. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Understanding fast-ion conduction in solid electrolytes’. The Royal Society 2021-11-29 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8529417/ /pubmed/34628943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0467 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Wood, Brandon C.
Varley, Joel B.
Kweon, Kyoung E.
Shea, Patrick
Hall, Alex T.
Grieder, Andrew
Ward, Michael
Aguirre, Vincent P.
Rigling, Dylan
Lopez Ventura, Eduardo
Stancill, Chimara
Adelstein, Nicole
Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes
title Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes
title_full Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes
title_fullStr Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes
title_full_unstemmed Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes
title_short Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes
title_sort paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34628943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0467
work_keys_str_mv AT woodbrandonc paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes
AT varleyjoelb paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes
AT kweonkyounge paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes
AT sheapatrick paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes
AT hallalext paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes
AT griederandrew paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes
AT wardmichael paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes
AT aguirrevincentp paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes
AT riglingdylan paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes
AT lopezventuraeduardo paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes
AT stancillchimara paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes
AT adelsteinnicole paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes