Cargando…
Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes
Superionic solid electrolytes have widespread use in energy devices, but the fundamental motivations for fast ion conduction are often elusive. In this Perspective, we draw upon atomistic simulations of a wide range of superionic conductors to illustrate some ways frustration can lower diffusion cat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34628943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0467 |
_version_ | 1784586465884241920 |
---|---|
author | Wood, Brandon C. Varley, Joel B. Kweon, Kyoung E. Shea, Patrick Hall, Alex T. Grieder, Andrew Ward, Michael Aguirre, Vincent P. Rigling, Dylan Lopez Ventura, Eduardo Stancill, Chimara Adelstein, Nicole |
author_facet | Wood, Brandon C. Varley, Joel B. Kweon, Kyoung E. Shea, Patrick Hall, Alex T. Grieder, Andrew Ward, Michael Aguirre, Vincent P. Rigling, Dylan Lopez Ventura, Eduardo Stancill, Chimara Adelstein, Nicole |
author_sort | Wood, Brandon C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Superionic solid electrolytes have widespread use in energy devices, but the fundamental motivations for fast ion conduction are often elusive. In this Perspective, we draw upon atomistic simulations of a wide range of superionic conductors to illustrate some ways frustration can lower diffusion cation barriers in solids. Based on our studies of halides, oxides, sulfides and hydroborates and a survey of published reports, we classify three types of frustration that create competition between different local atomic preferences, thereby flattening the diffusive energy landscape. These include chemical frustration, which derives from competing factors in the anion–cation interaction; structural frustration, which arises from lattice arrangements that induce site distortion or prevent cation ordering; and dynamical frustration, which is associated with temporary fluctuations in the energy landscape due to anion reorientation or cation reconfiguration. For each class of frustration, we provide detailed simulation analyses of various materials to show how ion mobility is facilitated, resulting in stabilizing factors that are both entropic and enthalpic in origin. We propose the use of these categories as a general construct for classifying frustration in superionic conductors and discuss implications for future development of suitable descriptors and improvement strategies. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Understanding fast-ion conduction in solid electrolytes’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8529417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85294172022-02-02 Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes Wood, Brandon C. Varley, Joel B. Kweon, Kyoung E. Shea, Patrick Hall, Alex T. Grieder, Andrew Ward, Michael Aguirre, Vincent P. Rigling, Dylan Lopez Ventura, Eduardo Stancill, Chimara Adelstein, Nicole Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Articles Superionic solid electrolytes have widespread use in energy devices, but the fundamental motivations for fast ion conduction are often elusive. In this Perspective, we draw upon atomistic simulations of a wide range of superionic conductors to illustrate some ways frustration can lower diffusion cation barriers in solids. Based on our studies of halides, oxides, sulfides and hydroborates and a survey of published reports, we classify three types of frustration that create competition between different local atomic preferences, thereby flattening the diffusive energy landscape. These include chemical frustration, which derives from competing factors in the anion–cation interaction; structural frustration, which arises from lattice arrangements that induce site distortion or prevent cation ordering; and dynamical frustration, which is associated with temporary fluctuations in the energy landscape due to anion reorientation or cation reconfiguration. For each class of frustration, we provide detailed simulation analyses of various materials to show how ion mobility is facilitated, resulting in stabilizing factors that are both entropic and enthalpic in origin. We propose the use of these categories as a general construct for classifying frustration in superionic conductors and discuss implications for future development of suitable descriptors and improvement strategies. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Understanding fast-ion conduction in solid electrolytes’. The Royal Society 2021-11-29 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8529417/ /pubmed/34628943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0467 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Wood, Brandon C. Varley, Joel B. Kweon, Kyoung E. Shea, Patrick Hall, Alex T. Grieder, Andrew Ward, Michael Aguirre, Vincent P. Rigling, Dylan Lopez Ventura, Eduardo Stancill, Chimara Adelstein, Nicole Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes |
title | Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes |
title_full | Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes |
title_fullStr | Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes |
title_full_unstemmed | Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes |
title_short | Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes |
title_sort | paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34628943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0467 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodbrandonc paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes AT varleyjoelb paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes AT kweonkyounge paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes AT sheapatrick paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes AT hallalext paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes AT griederandrew paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes AT wardmichael paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes AT aguirrevincentp paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes AT riglingdylan paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes AT lopezventuraeduardo paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes AT stancillchimara paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes AT adelsteinnicole paradigmsoffrustrationinsuperionicsolidelectrolytes |