Cargando…

Optical properties of CAD-CAM monolithic systems compared: three multi-layered zirconia and one lithium disilicate system

OBJECTIVE: this in vitro investigation aims to evaluate and compare optical properties of three types of esthetic CAD-CAM monolithic multi-layered zirconia materials with a control (conventional lithium disilicate, IPS e. max CAD). METHODS: Four monolithic CAD-CAM ceramic materials were investigated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ziyad, Tareq A., Abu-Naba'a, Layla A., Almohammed, Saleh N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08151
_version_ 1784586485020753920
author Ziyad, Tareq A.
Abu-Naba'a, Layla A.
Almohammed, Saleh N.
author_facet Ziyad, Tareq A.
Abu-Naba'a, Layla A.
Almohammed, Saleh N.
author_sort Ziyad, Tareq A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: this in vitro investigation aims to evaluate and compare optical properties of three types of esthetic CAD-CAM monolithic multi-layered zirconia materials with a control (conventional lithium disilicate, IPS e. max CAD). METHODS: Four monolithic CAD-CAM ceramic materials were investigated: Ceramill Zolid® FX Multilayer (ZF), IPS e. max® ZirCAD MT Multi (ZM), Katana® STML (KS) and one lithium disilicate glass-ceramics as a control (IPS e. max® CAD LT; LC). A total of 72 (15 × 15 × 1 mm) samples were CAD CAM fabricated and sintered based on sample-size power calculations, and each material comprised 18 samples. The translucency and opalescence parameters with the contrast ratio were evaluated with a dental spectrophotometer over the backgrounds of black and white. The data were analyzed by ANOVA, then Bonferroni post hoc comparison test was made between groups. The statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Zirconia materials revealed lower optical properties than the lithium disilicate control LC (P < 0.05). TP values ranged from 14.174 to 20.439. No differences were detected between the zirconia products in terms of TP and CR (P = 1.000). OP values ranged from 5.068 to 10.097. The lowest OP values were found statistically significant for ZF followed by KS and ZM (P = 1.000). LC had the highest TP and OP values, as well as the lowest CR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The optical properties of monolithic zirconia systems tested here are still lower than those of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. The only difference observed between the monolithic CAD CAM zirconia materials, was for the low opalescence parameter for the ZF. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Multi-layered monolithic zirconia systems have better esthetics by shade layers resembling natural tooth color gradients. CAD-CAM technology allowed for in-office milling and shaping of restorations using these systems. This study reports on their optical properties affecting human vision/perception of natural tooth shade to conclude about their use in the esthetic zones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8529506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85295062021-10-27 Optical properties of CAD-CAM monolithic systems compared: three multi-layered zirconia and one lithium disilicate system Ziyad, Tareq A. Abu-Naba'a, Layla A. Almohammed, Saleh N. Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVE: this in vitro investigation aims to evaluate and compare optical properties of three types of esthetic CAD-CAM monolithic multi-layered zirconia materials with a control (conventional lithium disilicate, IPS e. max CAD). METHODS: Four monolithic CAD-CAM ceramic materials were investigated: Ceramill Zolid® FX Multilayer (ZF), IPS e. max® ZirCAD MT Multi (ZM), Katana® STML (KS) and one lithium disilicate glass-ceramics as a control (IPS e. max® CAD LT; LC). A total of 72 (15 × 15 × 1 mm) samples were CAD CAM fabricated and sintered based on sample-size power calculations, and each material comprised 18 samples. The translucency and opalescence parameters with the contrast ratio were evaluated with a dental spectrophotometer over the backgrounds of black and white. The data were analyzed by ANOVA, then Bonferroni post hoc comparison test was made between groups. The statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Zirconia materials revealed lower optical properties than the lithium disilicate control LC (P < 0.05). TP values ranged from 14.174 to 20.439. No differences were detected between the zirconia products in terms of TP and CR (P = 1.000). OP values ranged from 5.068 to 10.097. The lowest OP values were found statistically significant for ZF followed by KS and ZM (P = 1.000). LC had the highest TP and OP values, as well as the lowest CR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The optical properties of monolithic zirconia systems tested here are still lower than those of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. The only difference observed between the monolithic CAD CAM zirconia materials, was for the low opalescence parameter for the ZF. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Multi-layered monolithic zirconia systems have better esthetics by shade layers resembling natural tooth color gradients. CAD-CAM technology allowed for in-office milling and shaping of restorations using these systems. This study reports on their optical properties affecting human vision/perception of natural tooth shade to conclude about their use in the esthetic zones. Elsevier 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8529506/ /pubmed/34712853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08151 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Ziyad, Tareq A.
Abu-Naba'a, Layla A.
Almohammed, Saleh N.
Optical properties of CAD-CAM monolithic systems compared: three multi-layered zirconia and one lithium disilicate system
title Optical properties of CAD-CAM monolithic systems compared: three multi-layered zirconia and one lithium disilicate system
title_full Optical properties of CAD-CAM monolithic systems compared: three multi-layered zirconia and one lithium disilicate system
title_fullStr Optical properties of CAD-CAM monolithic systems compared: three multi-layered zirconia and one lithium disilicate system
title_full_unstemmed Optical properties of CAD-CAM monolithic systems compared: three multi-layered zirconia and one lithium disilicate system
title_short Optical properties of CAD-CAM monolithic systems compared: three multi-layered zirconia and one lithium disilicate system
title_sort optical properties of cad-cam monolithic systems compared: three multi-layered zirconia and one lithium disilicate system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08151
work_keys_str_mv AT ziyadtareqa opticalpropertiesofcadcammonolithicsystemscomparedthreemultilayeredzirconiaandonelithiumdisilicatesystem
AT abunabaalaylaa opticalpropertiesofcadcammonolithicsystemscomparedthreemultilayeredzirconiaandonelithiumdisilicatesystem
AT almohammedsalehn opticalpropertiesofcadcammonolithicsystemscomparedthreemultilayeredzirconiaandonelithiumdisilicatesystem