Cargando…

Does the use of telephone reminders to increase survey response rates affect outcome estimates? An ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients with low back pain

BACKGROUND: Research is often undertaken using patient-reported outcomes from questionnaires. Achieving a high response rate demands expensive and time-consuming methods like telephone reminders. However, it is unknown whether telephone reminders change outcome estimates or only affect the response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Udby, Christina Lyngsø, Riis, Allan, Thomsen, Janus Laust, Rolving, Nanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04787-4
_version_ 1784586531771514880
author Udby, Christina Lyngsø
Riis, Allan
Thomsen, Janus Laust
Rolving, Nanna
author_facet Udby, Christina Lyngsø
Riis, Allan
Thomsen, Janus Laust
Rolving, Nanna
author_sort Udby, Christina Lyngsø
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research is often undertaken using patient-reported outcomes from questionnaires. Achieving a high response rate demands expensive and time-consuming methods like telephone reminders. However, it is unknown whether telephone reminders change outcome estimates or only affect the response rate in research of populations with low back pain (LBP). The aim is to compare baseline characteristics and the change in outcome between patients responding before and after receiving a telephone reminder. METHODS: This is an ancillary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study employing questionnaires from 812 adults with LBP lasting more than 3 months. Patients not responding to the 52-week questionnaire were sent reminder emails after two and 3 weeks and delivered postal reminders after 4 weeks. Patients still not responding were contacted by telephone, with a maximum of two attempts. Patients were categorised into three groups: 1) patients responding before a telephone reminder was performed; 2) patients responding after the telephone reminder and 3) patients not responding at all. A positive outcome was defined as a 30% improvement on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire after 52 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 695 patients (85.2%) responded. Of these, 643 patients were classified in Group 1 and 52 patients were classified in Group 2. One hundred seventeen were classified in Group 3. No differences in outcome or baseline characteristics was found. In Group 1, 41.3% had a positive outcome, and in Group 2 48.9% had a positive outcome (P = 0.297). In group 3, non-respondents were younger, more often unemployed, more often smokers, more often reported co-morbidity, and reported higher depression scores than respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Using a telephone reminder had no consequence on outcome estimates nor were there any differences in baseline characteristics between patients who responded before or after the telephone reminder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The initial trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03058315).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8529745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85297452021-10-25 Does the use of telephone reminders to increase survey response rates affect outcome estimates? An ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients with low back pain Udby, Christina Lyngsø Riis, Allan Thomsen, Janus Laust Rolving, Nanna BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Research is often undertaken using patient-reported outcomes from questionnaires. Achieving a high response rate demands expensive and time-consuming methods like telephone reminders. However, it is unknown whether telephone reminders change outcome estimates or only affect the response rate in research of populations with low back pain (LBP). The aim is to compare baseline characteristics and the change in outcome between patients responding before and after receiving a telephone reminder. METHODS: This is an ancillary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study employing questionnaires from 812 adults with LBP lasting more than 3 months. Patients not responding to the 52-week questionnaire were sent reminder emails after two and 3 weeks and delivered postal reminders after 4 weeks. Patients still not responding were contacted by telephone, with a maximum of two attempts. Patients were categorised into three groups: 1) patients responding before a telephone reminder was performed; 2) patients responding after the telephone reminder and 3) patients not responding at all. A positive outcome was defined as a 30% improvement on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire after 52 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 695 patients (85.2%) responded. Of these, 643 patients were classified in Group 1 and 52 patients were classified in Group 2. One hundred seventeen were classified in Group 3. No differences in outcome or baseline characteristics was found. In Group 1, 41.3% had a positive outcome, and in Group 2 48.9% had a positive outcome (P = 0.297). In group 3, non-respondents were younger, more often unemployed, more often smokers, more often reported co-morbidity, and reported higher depression scores than respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Using a telephone reminder had no consequence on outcome estimates nor were there any differences in baseline characteristics between patients who responded before or after the telephone reminder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The initial trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03058315). BioMed Central 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8529745/ /pubmed/34670521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04787-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Udby, Christina Lyngsø
Riis, Allan
Thomsen, Janus Laust
Rolving, Nanna
Does the use of telephone reminders to increase survey response rates affect outcome estimates? An ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients with low back pain
title Does the use of telephone reminders to increase survey response rates affect outcome estimates? An ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients with low back pain
title_full Does the use of telephone reminders to increase survey response rates affect outcome estimates? An ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients with low back pain
title_fullStr Does the use of telephone reminders to increase survey response rates affect outcome estimates? An ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients with low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Does the use of telephone reminders to increase survey response rates affect outcome estimates? An ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients with low back pain
title_short Does the use of telephone reminders to increase survey response rates affect outcome estimates? An ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients with low back pain
title_sort does the use of telephone reminders to increase survey response rates affect outcome estimates? an ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients with low back pain
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04787-4
work_keys_str_mv AT udbychristinalyngsø doestheuseoftelephonereminderstoincreasesurveyresponseratesaffectoutcomeestimatesanancillaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudyofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT riisallan doestheuseoftelephonereminderstoincreasesurveyresponseratesaffectoutcomeestimatesanancillaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudyofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT thomsenjanuslaust doestheuseoftelephonereminderstoincreasesurveyresponseratesaffectoutcomeestimatesanancillaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudyofpatientswithlowbackpain
AT rolvingnanna doestheuseoftelephonereminderstoincreasesurveyresponseratesaffectoutcomeestimatesanancillaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudyofpatientswithlowbackpain