Cargando…
Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer
BACKGROUND: To aid clinicians strategizing treatment for upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), this retrospective study investigated associations between primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) and prognosis in patients given surgical resection, radiotherapy, or both resection and radiotherapy....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08838-w |
_version_ | 1784586536303460352 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yuanmei Huang, Qiuyuan Chen, Junqiang Lin, Yu Huang, Xinyi Wang, Qifeng Yang, Yong Chen, Bijuan Ye, Yuling Zheng, Binglin Qi, Rong Chen, Yushan Xu, Yuanji |
author_facet | Chen, Yuanmei Huang, Qiuyuan Chen, Junqiang Lin, Yu Huang, Xinyi Wang, Qifeng Yang, Yong Chen, Bijuan Ye, Yuling Zheng, Binglin Qi, Rong Chen, Yushan Xu, Yuanji |
author_sort | Chen, Yuanmei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To aid clinicians strategizing treatment for upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), this retrospective study investigated associations between primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) and prognosis in patients given surgical resection, radiotherapy, or both resection and radiotherapy. METHODS: The population comprised 568 patients with upper ESCC given definitive treatment, including 238, 216, and 114 who underwent surgery, radiotherapy, or combined radiotherapy and surgery. GTVp as a continuous variable was entered into the multivariate Cox model using penalized splines (P-splines) to determine the optimal cutoff value. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust imbalanced characteristics among the treatment groups. RESULTS: P-spline regression revealed a dependence of patient outcomes on GTVp, with 30 cm(3) being an optimal cut-off for differences in overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS). GTVp ≥30 cm(3) was a negative independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. PSM analyses confirmed the prognostic value of GTVp. For GTVp < 30 cm(3), no significant survival differences were observed among the 3 treatments. For GTVp ≥30 cm(3), the worst 5-year OS rate was experienced by those given surgery. The 5-year PFS rate of patients given combined radiotherapy and surgery was significantly better than that of patients given radiotherapy. The surgical complications of patients given the combined treatment were comparable to those who received surgery, but radiation side effects were significantly lower. CONCLUSION: GTVp is prognostic for OS and PFS in upper ESCC. For patients with GTVp ≥30 cm(3), radiotherapy plus surgery was more effective than either treatment alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08838-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8529770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85297702021-10-25 Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer Chen, Yuanmei Huang, Qiuyuan Chen, Junqiang Lin, Yu Huang, Xinyi Wang, Qifeng Yang, Yong Chen, Bijuan Ye, Yuling Zheng, Binglin Qi, Rong Chen, Yushan Xu, Yuanji BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: To aid clinicians strategizing treatment for upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), this retrospective study investigated associations between primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) and prognosis in patients given surgical resection, radiotherapy, or both resection and radiotherapy. METHODS: The population comprised 568 patients with upper ESCC given definitive treatment, including 238, 216, and 114 who underwent surgery, radiotherapy, or combined radiotherapy and surgery. GTVp as a continuous variable was entered into the multivariate Cox model using penalized splines (P-splines) to determine the optimal cutoff value. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust imbalanced characteristics among the treatment groups. RESULTS: P-spline regression revealed a dependence of patient outcomes on GTVp, with 30 cm(3) being an optimal cut-off for differences in overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS). GTVp ≥30 cm(3) was a negative independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. PSM analyses confirmed the prognostic value of GTVp. For GTVp < 30 cm(3), no significant survival differences were observed among the 3 treatments. For GTVp ≥30 cm(3), the worst 5-year OS rate was experienced by those given surgery. The 5-year PFS rate of patients given combined radiotherapy and surgery was significantly better than that of patients given radiotherapy. The surgical complications of patients given the combined treatment were comparable to those who received surgery, but radiation side effects were significantly lower. CONCLUSION: GTVp is prognostic for OS and PFS in upper ESCC. For patients with GTVp ≥30 cm(3), radiotherapy plus surgery was more effective than either treatment alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08838-w. BioMed Central 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8529770/ /pubmed/34670513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08838-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chen, Yuanmei Huang, Qiuyuan Chen, Junqiang Lin, Yu Huang, Xinyi Wang, Qifeng Yang, Yong Chen, Bijuan Ye, Yuling Zheng, Binglin Qi, Rong Chen, Yushan Xu, Yuanji Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer |
title | Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer |
title_full | Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer |
title_fullStr | Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer |
title_short | Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer |
title_sort | primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08838-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyuanmei primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT huangqiuyuan primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT chenjunqiang primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT linyu primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT huangxinyi primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT wangqifeng primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT yangyong primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT chenbijuan primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT yeyuling primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT zhengbinglin primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT qirong primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT chenyushan primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer AT xuyuanji primarygrosstumorvolumeisprognosticandsuggeststreatmentinupperesophagealcancer |