Cargando…

Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer, one of most common neoplasms, is characterized by an overall survival rate exceeding 60%. Nonetheless, local recurrence (LR) following surgery for rectal cancer remains a formidable clinical problem. The aim of this study was to assess the value of postoperative endoscopic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jankowski, Michal, Wysocki, Wojciech M., Las-Jankowska, Manuela, Tkaczyński, Karol, Wiśniewski, Dorian, Bała, Dariusz, Zegarski, Wojciech
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02413-0
_version_ 1784586541006323712
author Jankowski, Michal
Wysocki, Wojciech M.
Las-Jankowska, Manuela
Tkaczyński, Karol
Wiśniewski, Dorian
Bała, Dariusz
Zegarski, Wojciech
author_facet Jankowski, Michal
Wysocki, Wojciech M.
Las-Jankowska, Manuela
Tkaczyński, Karol
Wiśniewski, Dorian
Bała, Dariusz
Zegarski, Wojciech
author_sort Jankowski, Michal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer, one of most common neoplasms, is characterized by an overall survival rate exceeding 60%. Nonetheless, local recurrence (LR) following surgery for rectal cancer remains a formidable clinical problem. The aim of this study was to assess the value of postoperative endoscopic surveillance (PES) for the early detection of LR in rectal cancer after radical anterior resection with sigmoid-rectal anastomosis. METHODS: We performed an anterior resection in 228 patients with stages I‑III rectal cancer who had undergone surgery from 2001 to 2008 in the Oncology Center in Bydgoszcz, Poland. Of these patients, 169 had perioperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. All patients underwent PES with abdominal and pelvic imaging (abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance) and clinical examination. Sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios, negative likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to compare the value of colonoscopy versus imaging techniques for the diagnosis of LR. RESULTS: During the 5-year follow-up, recurrences occurred in 49 (21%) patients; of these, 15 (6%) had LR, which was most often located outside the intestinal lumen (n = 10, 4%). Anastomotic LR occurred in 5 (2%) patients. The mean time to anastomotic LR was 30 months after initial surgery, similar to that of other locations (29 months). Both imaging and endoscopy were shown to be efficient techniques for the diagnosis of LR in anastomotic sites. In the study group, endoscopy did not provide any additional benefit in patients who were receiving radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of PES for the detection of LR after curative treatment of rectal cancer is limited and not superior to imaging techniques. It remains a useful method, however, for the histopathological confirmation of suspected or confirmed recurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02413-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8529797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85297972021-10-25 Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study Jankowski, Michal Wysocki, Wojciech M. Las-Jankowska, Manuela Tkaczyński, Karol Wiśniewski, Dorian Bała, Dariusz Zegarski, Wojciech World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer, one of most common neoplasms, is characterized by an overall survival rate exceeding 60%. Nonetheless, local recurrence (LR) following surgery for rectal cancer remains a formidable clinical problem. The aim of this study was to assess the value of postoperative endoscopic surveillance (PES) for the early detection of LR in rectal cancer after radical anterior resection with sigmoid-rectal anastomosis. METHODS: We performed an anterior resection in 228 patients with stages I‑III rectal cancer who had undergone surgery from 2001 to 2008 in the Oncology Center in Bydgoszcz, Poland. Of these patients, 169 had perioperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. All patients underwent PES with abdominal and pelvic imaging (abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance) and clinical examination. Sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios, negative likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to compare the value of colonoscopy versus imaging techniques for the diagnosis of LR. RESULTS: During the 5-year follow-up, recurrences occurred in 49 (21%) patients; of these, 15 (6%) had LR, which was most often located outside the intestinal lumen (n = 10, 4%). Anastomotic LR occurred in 5 (2%) patients. The mean time to anastomotic LR was 30 months after initial surgery, similar to that of other locations (29 months). Both imaging and endoscopy were shown to be efficient techniques for the diagnosis of LR in anastomotic sites. In the study group, endoscopy did not provide any additional benefit in patients who were receiving radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of PES for the detection of LR after curative treatment of rectal cancer is limited and not superior to imaging techniques. It remains a useful method, however, for the histopathological confirmation of suspected or confirmed recurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02413-0. BioMed Central 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8529797/ /pubmed/34670554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02413-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jankowski, Michal
Wysocki, Wojciech M.
Las-Jankowska, Manuela
Tkaczyński, Karol
Wiśniewski, Dorian
Bała, Dariusz
Zegarski, Wojciech
Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study
title Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study
title_full Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study
title_fullStr Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study
title_short Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study
title_sort efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? a retrospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8529797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02413-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jankowskimichal efficacyofendoscopicsurveillanceinthedetectionoflocalrecurrenceafterradicalrectalcancersurgeryislimitedaretrospectivestudy
AT wysockiwojciechm efficacyofendoscopicsurveillanceinthedetectionoflocalrecurrenceafterradicalrectalcancersurgeryislimitedaretrospectivestudy
AT lasjankowskamanuela efficacyofendoscopicsurveillanceinthedetectionoflocalrecurrenceafterradicalrectalcancersurgeryislimitedaretrospectivestudy
AT tkaczynskikarol efficacyofendoscopicsurveillanceinthedetectionoflocalrecurrenceafterradicalrectalcancersurgeryislimitedaretrospectivestudy
AT wisniewskidorian efficacyofendoscopicsurveillanceinthedetectionoflocalrecurrenceafterradicalrectalcancersurgeryislimitedaretrospectivestudy
AT baładariusz efficacyofendoscopicsurveillanceinthedetectionoflocalrecurrenceafterradicalrectalcancersurgeryislimitedaretrospectivestudy
AT zegarskiwojciech efficacyofendoscopicsurveillanceinthedetectionoflocalrecurrenceafterradicalrectalcancersurgeryislimitedaretrospectivestudy