Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations
A variety of tDCS approaches has been used to investigate the potential of tDCS to improve language outcomes, or slow down the decay of language competences caused by Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The employed stimulation protocols and study designs in PPA are generally speaking similar to thos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34690737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.710818 |
_version_ | 1784586621202464768 |
---|---|
author | Coemans, Silke Struys, Esli Vandenborre, Dorien Wilssens, Ineke Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Paquier, Philippe Tsapkini, Kyrana Keulen, Stefanie |
author_facet | Coemans, Silke Struys, Esli Vandenborre, Dorien Wilssens, Ineke Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Paquier, Philippe Tsapkini, Kyrana Keulen, Stefanie |
author_sort | Coemans, Silke |
collection | PubMed |
description | A variety of tDCS approaches has been used to investigate the potential of tDCS to improve language outcomes, or slow down the decay of language competences caused by Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The employed stimulation protocols and study designs in PPA are generally speaking similar to those deployed in post-stroke aphasic populations. These two etiologies of aphasia however differ substantially in their pathophysiology, and for both conditions the optimal stimulation paradigm still needs to be established. A systematic review was done and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were analyzed focusing on differences and similarities across studies especially focusing on PPA patient characteristics (age, PPA variant, language background), tDCS stimulation protocols (intensity, frequency, combined therapy, electrode configuration) and study design as recent reviews and group outcomes for individual studies suggest tDCS is an effective tool to improve language outcomes, while methodological approach and patient characteristics are mentioned as moderators that may influence treatment effects. We found that studies of tDCS in PPA have clinical and methodological and heterogeneity regarding patient populations, stimulation protocols and study design. While positive group results are usually found irrespective of these differences, the magnitude, duration and generalization of these outcomes differ when comparing stimulation locations, and when results are stratified according to the clinical variant of PPA. We interpret the results of included studies in light of patient characteristics and methodological decisions. Further, we highlight the role neuroimaging can play in study protocols and interpreting results and make recommendations for future work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8530184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85301842021-10-22 A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations Coemans, Silke Struys, Esli Vandenborre, Dorien Wilssens, Ineke Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Paquier, Philippe Tsapkini, Kyrana Keulen, Stefanie Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience A variety of tDCS approaches has been used to investigate the potential of tDCS to improve language outcomes, or slow down the decay of language competences caused by Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The employed stimulation protocols and study designs in PPA are generally speaking similar to those deployed in post-stroke aphasic populations. These two etiologies of aphasia however differ substantially in their pathophysiology, and for both conditions the optimal stimulation paradigm still needs to be established. A systematic review was done and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were analyzed focusing on differences and similarities across studies especially focusing on PPA patient characteristics (age, PPA variant, language background), tDCS stimulation protocols (intensity, frequency, combined therapy, electrode configuration) and study design as recent reviews and group outcomes for individual studies suggest tDCS is an effective tool to improve language outcomes, while methodological approach and patient characteristics are mentioned as moderators that may influence treatment effects. We found that studies of tDCS in PPA have clinical and methodological and heterogeneity regarding patient populations, stimulation protocols and study design. While positive group results are usually found irrespective of these differences, the magnitude, duration and generalization of these outcomes differ when comparing stimulation locations, and when results are stratified according to the clinical variant of PPA. We interpret the results of included studies in light of patient characteristics and methodological decisions. Further, we highlight the role neuroimaging can play in study protocols and interpreting results and make recommendations for future work. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8530184/ /pubmed/34690737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.710818 Text en Copyright © 2021 Coemans, Struys, Vandenborre, Wilssens, Engelborghs, Paquier, Tsapkini and Keulen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Coemans, Silke Struys, Esli Vandenborre, Dorien Wilssens, Ineke Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Paquier, Philippe Tsapkini, Kyrana Keulen, Stefanie A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations |
title | A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations |
title_sort | systematic review of transcranial direct current stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: methodological considerations |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34690737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.710818 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coemanssilke asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT struysesli asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT vandenborredorien asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT wilssensineke asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT engelborghssebastiaan asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT paquierphilippe asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT tsapkinikyrana asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT keulenstefanie asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT coemanssilke systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT struysesli systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT vandenborredorien systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT wilssensineke systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT engelborghssebastiaan systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT paquierphilippe systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT tsapkinikyrana systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations AT keulenstefanie systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations |