Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations

A variety of tDCS approaches has been used to investigate the potential of tDCS to improve language outcomes, or slow down the decay of language competences caused by Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The employed stimulation protocols and study designs in PPA are generally speaking similar to thos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coemans, Silke, Struys, Esli, Vandenborre, Dorien, Wilssens, Ineke, Engelborghs, Sebastiaan, Paquier, Philippe, Tsapkini, Kyrana, Keulen, Stefanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34690737
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.710818
_version_ 1784586621202464768
author Coemans, Silke
Struys, Esli
Vandenborre, Dorien
Wilssens, Ineke
Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
Paquier, Philippe
Tsapkini, Kyrana
Keulen, Stefanie
author_facet Coemans, Silke
Struys, Esli
Vandenborre, Dorien
Wilssens, Ineke
Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
Paquier, Philippe
Tsapkini, Kyrana
Keulen, Stefanie
author_sort Coemans, Silke
collection PubMed
description A variety of tDCS approaches has been used to investigate the potential of tDCS to improve language outcomes, or slow down the decay of language competences caused by Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The employed stimulation protocols and study designs in PPA are generally speaking similar to those deployed in post-stroke aphasic populations. These two etiologies of aphasia however differ substantially in their pathophysiology, and for both conditions the optimal stimulation paradigm still needs to be established. A systematic review was done and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were analyzed focusing on differences and similarities across studies especially focusing on PPA patient characteristics (age, PPA variant, language background), tDCS stimulation protocols (intensity, frequency, combined therapy, electrode configuration) and study design as recent reviews and group outcomes for individual studies suggest tDCS is an effective tool to improve language outcomes, while methodological approach and patient characteristics are mentioned as moderators that may influence treatment effects. We found that studies of tDCS in PPA have clinical and methodological and heterogeneity regarding patient populations, stimulation protocols and study design. While positive group results are usually found irrespective of these differences, the magnitude, duration and generalization of these outcomes differ when comparing stimulation locations, and when results are stratified according to the clinical variant of PPA. We interpret the results of included studies in light of patient characteristics and methodological decisions. Further, we highlight the role neuroimaging can play in study protocols and interpreting results and make recommendations for future work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8530184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85301842021-10-22 A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations Coemans, Silke Struys, Esli Vandenborre, Dorien Wilssens, Ineke Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Paquier, Philippe Tsapkini, Kyrana Keulen, Stefanie Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience A variety of tDCS approaches has been used to investigate the potential of tDCS to improve language outcomes, or slow down the decay of language competences caused by Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The employed stimulation protocols and study designs in PPA are generally speaking similar to those deployed in post-stroke aphasic populations. These two etiologies of aphasia however differ substantially in their pathophysiology, and for both conditions the optimal stimulation paradigm still needs to be established. A systematic review was done and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were analyzed focusing on differences and similarities across studies especially focusing on PPA patient characteristics (age, PPA variant, language background), tDCS stimulation protocols (intensity, frequency, combined therapy, electrode configuration) and study design as recent reviews and group outcomes for individual studies suggest tDCS is an effective tool to improve language outcomes, while methodological approach and patient characteristics are mentioned as moderators that may influence treatment effects. We found that studies of tDCS in PPA have clinical and methodological and heterogeneity regarding patient populations, stimulation protocols and study design. While positive group results are usually found irrespective of these differences, the magnitude, duration and generalization of these outcomes differ when comparing stimulation locations, and when results are stratified according to the clinical variant of PPA. We interpret the results of included studies in light of patient characteristics and methodological decisions. Further, we highlight the role neuroimaging can play in study protocols and interpreting results and make recommendations for future work. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8530184/ /pubmed/34690737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.710818 Text en Copyright © 2021 Coemans, Struys, Vandenborre, Wilssens, Engelborghs, Paquier, Tsapkini and Keulen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Coemans, Silke
Struys, Esli
Vandenborre, Dorien
Wilssens, Ineke
Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
Paquier, Philippe
Tsapkini, Kyrana
Keulen, Stefanie
A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations
title A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations
title_full A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations
title_short A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations
title_sort systematic review of transcranial direct current stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: methodological considerations
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34690737
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.710818
work_keys_str_mv AT coemanssilke asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT struysesli asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT vandenborredorien asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT wilssensineke asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT engelborghssebastiaan asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT paquierphilippe asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT tsapkinikyrana asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT keulenstefanie asystematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT coemanssilke systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT struysesli systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT vandenborredorien systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT wilssensineke systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT engelborghssebastiaan systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT paquierphilippe systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT tsapkinikyrana systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations
AT keulenstefanie systematicreviewoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinprimaryprogressiveaphasiamethodologicalconsiderations