Cargando…

A Feasible Option before Cycle Cancellation for Poor Responders; STOP-START Protocol

Despite the advances in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), management of a subgroup of poor ovarian responder patients may still be challenging. We describe a feasible and simplified protocol, namely the STOP-START protocol, for poor responders defined as Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer, Şükür, Yavuz Emre, Özmen, Batuhan, Sönmezer, Murat, Berker, Bülent, Aytaç, Ruşen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royan Institute 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34913300
http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/IJFS.2021.134626
_version_ 1784586628223729664
author Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer
Şükür, Yavuz Emre
Özmen, Batuhan
Sönmezer, Murat
Berker, Bülent
Aytaç, Ruşen
author_facet Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer
Şükür, Yavuz Emre
Özmen, Batuhan
Sönmezer, Murat
Berker, Bülent
Aytaç, Ruşen
author_sort Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer
collection PubMed
description Despite the advances in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), management of a subgroup of poor ovarian responder patients may still be challenging. We describe a feasible and simplified protocol, namely the STOP-START protocol, for poor responders defined as Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualize D Oocyte Number (POSEI- DON) groups 3 and 4, who are unresponsive to COS with maximum dose gonadotrophins. Data of 11 women un- responsive to COS were reviewed. Mean age of the patients was 36.5 ± 6.0 years. Unresponsiveness was defined as no follicular growth >9 mm and/or estradiol level less than 40 pg/ml after a week of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH, 225-300 IU) administration. In that case, COS was stopped and each woman underwent weekly ul- trasound assessment to catch a secondary follicular growth. All women showed at least one follicular growth within five to 20 days. Six women (54.5%) had spontaneous follicular growth and the other five required ovarian stimulation. At least one oocyte was retrieved from each one of seven patients (63.6%). The mean number of oocytes retrieved was 1.6 ± 1.4 and five women (45.5%) had at least one grade A embryo. Among all, two women became pregnant successfully and both gave live births (18.2%). In conclusion, STOP-START protocol may potentially be an effective, feasible, and time-saving management option for POSEIDON group 3/4 poor responders who are unresponsive to standard COS treatment with maximum dose gonadotrophins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8530218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Royan Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85302182021-10-29 A Feasible Option before Cycle Cancellation for Poor Responders; STOP-START Protocol Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer Şükür, Yavuz Emre Özmen, Batuhan Sönmezer, Murat Berker, Bülent Aytaç, Ruşen Int J Fertil Steril Case Report Despite the advances in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), management of a subgroup of poor ovarian responder patients may still be challenging. We describe a feasible and simplified protocol, namely the STOP-START protocol, for poor responders defined as Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualize D Oocyte Number (POSEI- DON) groups 3 and 4, who are unresponsive to COS with maximum dose gonadotrophins. Data of 11 women un- responsive to COS were reviewed. Mean age of the patients was 36.5 ± 6.0 years. Unresponsiveness was defined as no follicular growth >9 mm and/or estradiol level less than 40 pg/ml after a week of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH, 225-300 IU) administration. In that case, COS was stopped and each woman underwent weekly ul- trasound assessment to catch a secondary follicular growth. All women showed at least one follicular growth within five to 20 days. Six women (54.5%) had spontaneous follicular growth and the other five required ovarian stimulation. At least one oocyte was retrieved from each one of seven patients (63.6%). The mean number of oocytes retrieved was 1.6 ± 1.4 and five women (45.5%) had at least one grade A embryo. Among all, two women became pregnant successfully and both gave live births (18.2%). In conclusion, STOP-START protocol may potentially be an effective, feasible, and time-saving management option for POSEIDON group 3/4 poor responders who are unresponsive to standard COS treatment with maximum dose gonadotrophins. Royan Institute 2021 2021-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8530218/ /pubmed/34913300 http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/IJFS.2021.134626 Text en The Cell Journal (Yakhteh) is an open access journal which means the articles are freely available online for any individual author to download and use the providing address. The journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported License which allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions that is permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer
Şükür, Yavuz Emre
Özmen, Batuhan
Sönmezer, Murat
Berker, Bülent
Aytaç, Ruşen
A Feasible Option before Cycle Cancellation for Poor Responders; STOP-START Protocol
title A Feasible Option before Cycle Cancellation for Poor Responders; STOP-START Protocol
title_full A Feasible Option before Cycle Cancellation for Poor Responders; STOP-START Protocol
title_fullStr A Feasible Option before Cycle Cancellation for Poor Responders; STOP-START Protocol
title_full_unstemmed A Feasible Option before Cycle Cancellation for Poor Responders; STOP-START Protocol
title_short A Feasible Option before Cycle Cancellation for Poor Responders; STOP-START Protocol
title_sort feasible option before cycle cancellation for poor responders; stop-start protocol
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34913300
http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/IJFS.2021.134626
work_keys_str_mv AT atabekoglucemsomer afeasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol
AT sukuryavuzemre afeasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol
AT ozmenbatuhan afeasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol
AT sonmezermurat afeasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol
AT berkerbulent afeasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol
AT aytacrusen afeasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol
AT atabekoglucemsomer feasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol
AT sukuryavuzemre feasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol
AT ozmenbatuhan feasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol
AT sonmezermurat feasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol
AT berkerbulent feasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol
AT aytacrusen feasibleoptionbeforecyclecancellationforpoorrespondersstopstartprotocol