Cargando…
Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017
We build on recent examinations questioning the quality of online information about probiotic products by studying the themes of content, detecting virtual communities and identifying key influencers in social media using data science techniques. We conducted topic modelling (n = 36,715 tweets) and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34673767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258098 |
_version_ | 1784586646463709184 |
---|---|
author | Vijaykumar, Santosh Raamkumar, Aravind Sesagiri McCarty, Kristofor Mutumbwa, Cuthbert Mustafa, Jawwad Au, Cyndy |
author_facet | Vijaykumar, Santosh Raamkumar, Aravind Sesagiri McCarty, Kristofor Mutumbwa, Cuthbert Mustafa, Jawwad Au, Cyndy |
author_sort | Vijaykumar, Santosh |
collection | PubMed |
description | We build on recent examinations questioning the quality of online information about probiotic products by studying the themes of content, detecting virtual communities and identifying key influencers in social media using data science techniques. We conducted topic modelling (n = 36,715 tweets) and longitudinal social network analysis (n = 17,834 tweets) of probiotic chatter on Twitter from 2009–17. We used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to build the topic models and network analysis tool Gephi for building yearly graphs. We identified the top 10 topics of probiotics-related communication on Twitter and a constant rise in communication activity. However the number of communities grew consistently to peak in 2014 before dipping and levelling off by 2017. While several probiotics industry actors appeared and disappeared during this period, the influence of one specific actor rose from a hub initially to an authority in the latter years. With multi-brand advertising and probiotics promotions mostly occupying the Twitter chatter, scientists, journalists, or policymakers exerted minimal influence in these communities. Consistent with previous research, we find that probiotics-related content on social media veers towards promotions and benefits. Probiotic industry actors maintain consistent presence on Twitter while transitioning from hubs to authorities over time; scientific entities assume an authoritative role without much engagement. The involvement of scientific, journalistic or regulatory stakeholders will help create a balanced informational environment surrounding probiotic products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8530318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85303182021-10-22 Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017 Vijaykumar, Santosh Raamkumar, Aravind Sesagiri McCarty, Kristofor Mutumbwa, Cuthbert Mustafa, Jawwad Au, Cyndy PLoS One Research Article We build on recent examinations questioning the quality of online information about probiotic products by studying the themes of content, detecting virtual communities and identifying key influencers in social media using data science techniques. We conducted topic modelling (n = 36,715 tweets) and longitudinal social network analysis (n = 17,834 tweets) of probiotic chatter on Twitter from 2009–17. We used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to build the topic models and network analysis tool Gephi for building yearly graphs. We identified the top 10 topics of probiotics-related communication on Twitter and a constant rise in communication activity. However the number of communities grew consistently to peak in 2014 before dipping and levelling off by 2017. While several probiotics industry actors appeared and disappeared during this period, the influence of one specific actor rose from a hub initially to an authority in the latter years. With multi-brand advertising and probiotics promotions mostly occupying the Twitter chatter, scientists, journalists, or policymakers exerted minimal influence in these communities. Consistent with previous research, we find that probiotics-related content on social media veers towards promotions and benefits. Probiotic industry actors maintain consistent presence on Twitter while transitioning from hubs to authorities over time; scientific entities assume an authoritative role without much engagement. The involvement of scientific, journalistic or regulatory stakeholders will help create a balanced informational environment surrounding probiotic products. Public Library of Science 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8530318/ /pubmed/34673767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258098 Text en © 2021 Vijaykumar et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vijaykumar, Santosh Raamkumar, Aravind Sesagiri McCarty, Kristofor Mutumbwa, Cuthbert Mustafa, Jawwad Au, Cyndy Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017 |
title | Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017 |
title_full | Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017 |
title_fullStr | Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017 |
title_full_unstemmed | Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017 |
title_short | Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017 |
title_sort | themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: a retrospective analysis from 2009-2017 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34673767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258098 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vijaykumarsantosh themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017 AT raamkumararavindsesagiri themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017 AT mccartykristofor themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017 AT mutumbwacuthbert themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017 AT mustafajawwad themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017 AT aucyndy themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017 |