Cargando…

Top-down resolution of visual ambiguity – knowledge from the future or footprints from the past?

Current theories about visual perception assume that our perceptual system weights the a priori incomplete, noisy and ambiguous sensory information with previous, memorized perceptual experiences in order to construct stable and reliable percepts. These theories are supported by numerous experimenta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kornmeier, Jürgen, Bhatia, Kriti, Joos, Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34673791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258667
_version_ 1784586654314397696
author Kornmeier, Jürgen
Bhatia, Kriti
Joos, Ellen
author_facet Kornmeier, Jürgen
Bhatia, Kriti
Joos, Ellen
author_sort Kornmeier, Jürgen
collection PubMed
description Current theories about visual perception assume that our perceptual system weights the a priori incomplete, noisy and ambiguous sensory information with previous, memorized perceptual experiences in order to construct stable and reliable percepts. These theories are supported by numerous experimental findings. Theories about precognition have an opposite point of view. They assume that information from the future can have influence on perception, thoughts, and behavior. Several experimental studies provide evidence for precognition effects, other studies found no such effects. One problem may be that the vast majority of precognition paradigms did not systematically control for potential effects from the perceptual history. In the present study, we presented ambiguous Necker cube stimuli and disambiguated cube variants and systematically tested in two separate experiments whether perception of a currently observed ambiguous Necker cube stimulus can be influenced by a disambiguated cube variant, presented in the immediate perceptual past (perceptual history effects) and/or in the immediate perceptual future (precognition effects). We found perceptual history effects, which partly depended on the length of the perceptual history trace but were independent of the perceptual future. Results from some individual participants suggest on the first glance a precognition pattern, but results from our second experiment make a perceptual history explanation more probable. On the group level, no precognition effects were statistically indicated. The perceptual history effects found in the present study are in confirmation with related studies from the literature. The precognition analysis revealed some interesting individual patterns, which however did not allow for general conclusions. Overall, the present study demonstrates that any future experiment about sensory or extrasensory perception urgently needs to control for potential perceptual history effects and that temporal aspects of stimulus presentation are of high relevance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8530352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85303522021-10-22 Top-down resolution of visual ambiguity – knowledge from the future or footprints from the past? Kornmeier, Jürgen Bhatia, Kriti Joos, Ellen PLoS One Research Article Current theories about visual perception assume that our perceptual system weights the a priori incomplete, noisy and ambiguous sensory information with previous, memorized perceptual experiences in order to construct stable and reliable percepts. These theories are supported by numerous experimental findings. Theories about precognition have an opposite point of view. They assume that information from the future can have influence on perception, thoughts, and behavior. Several experimental studies provide evidence for precognition effects, other studies found no such effects. One problem may be that the vast majority of precognition paradigms did not systematically control for potential effects from the perceptual history. In the present study, we presented ambiguous Necker cube stimuli and disambiguated cube variants and systematically tested in two separate experiments whether perception of a currently observed ambiguous Necker cube stimulus can be influenced by a disambiguated cube variant, presented in the immediate perceptual past (perceptual history effects) and/or in the immediate perceptual future (precognition effects). We found perceptual history effects, which partly depended on the length of the perceptual history trace but were independent of the perceptual future. Results from some individual participants suggest on the first glance a precognition pattern, but results from our second experiment make a perceptual history explanation more probable. On the group level, no precognition effects were statistically indicated. The perceptual history effects found in the present study are in confirmation with related studies from the literature. The precognition analysis revealed some interesting individual patterns, which however did not allow for general conclusions. Overall, the present study demonstrates that any future experiment about sensory or extrasensory perception urgently needs to control for potential perceptual history effects and that temporal aspects of stimulus presentation are of high relevance. Public Library of Science 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8530352/ /pubmed/34673791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258667 Text en © 2021 Kornmeier et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kornmeier, Jürgen
Bhatia, Kriti
Joos, Ellen
Top-down resolution of visual ambiguity – knowledge from the future or footprints from the past?
title Top-down resolution of visual ambiguity – knowledge from the future or footprints from the past?
title_full Top-down resolution of visual ambiguity – knowledge from the future or footprints from the past?
title_fullStr Top-down resolution of visual ambiguity – knowledge from the future or footprints from the past?
title_full_unstemmed Top-down resolution of visual ambiguity – knowledge from the future or footprints from the past?
title_short Top-down resolution of visual ambiguity – knowledge from the future or footprints from the past?
title_sort top-down resolution of visual ambiguity – knowledge from the future or footprints from the past?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34673791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258667
work_keys_str_mv AT kornmeierjurgen topdownresolutionofvisualambiguityknowledgefromthefutureorfootprintsfromthepast
AT bhatiakriti topdownresolutionofvisualambiguityknowledgefromthefutureorfootprintsfromthepast
AT joosellen topdownresolutionofvisualambiguityknowledgefromthefutureorfootprintsfromthepast