Cargando…

Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of different pre-treatments on the long-term bond strength of fiberglass posts luted either with dual-curing self-etch adhesives and core build-up composites or with a self-adhesive resin (SAR) cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 180 human root-filled teeth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kosan, Esra, Prates-Soares, Ana, Blunck, Uwe, Neumann, Konrad, Bitter, Kerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8531046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34125299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03945-1
_version_ 1784586771614400512
author Kosan, Esra
Prates-Soares, Ana
Blunck, Uwe
Neumann, Konrad
Bitter, Kerstin
author_facet Kosan, Esra
Prates-Soares, Ana
Blunck, Uwe
Neumann, Konrad
Bitter, Kerstin
author_sort Kosan, Esra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of different pre-treatments on the long-term bond strength of fiberglass posts luted either with dual-curing self-etch adhesives and core build-up composites or with a self-adhesive resin (SAR) cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 180 human root-filled teeth received post-space preparations and three different dentin pre-treatments (PTs): PT1, ethanol (99%); PT2, ethanol-tertiary-butanol-water-solution (AH Plus Cleaner, Dentsply Sirona; York, USA); and PT3, distilled water (control). Five luting systems were used: FU, Futurabond U (Voco; Cuxhaven, Germany); CL, Clearfil DC Bond (Kuraray Noritake; Okayama, Japan); GR, Gradia Core SE Bond (GC Europe NV; Leuven, Belgium); LU, LuxaBond Universal (DMG; Hamburg, Germany); and RX, RelyX Unicem 2 (3M; Minnesota, USA). Roots were cut into six slices (1 mm thick). From each root canal region, three slices were submitted to immediate and three to post-storage push-out testing. The latter were subjected to thermocycling (5–55°C, 6.000 cycles) and stored for six months in saline solution (0.9%, 37°C). Data were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA and chi-square tests (MV±SD). RESULTS: Bond strength was significantly affected by material (p<0.0005), pre-treatment (p=0.016), and storage (p<0.0005; repeated-measures ANOVA). LU (18.8±8.1MPa) revealed significantly higher bond strength than RX (16.08±6.4MPa), GR (15.1±4.6MPa), CL (13.95±5.2MPa), and FU (13.7±6.3MPa). PT1 (16.5±6.9MPa) revealed significantly higher bond strength than PT3 (14.5±5.7MPa). CONCLUSIONS: A universal adhesive in self-etch mode combined with a core build-up material revealed higher bond strength than a SAR cement, both interacted positively with Ethanol pre-treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Ethanol (99%) rinsing can be recommended as part of post and core pre-treatment for the investigated luting systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8531046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85310462021-11-04 Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo Kosan, Esra Prates-Soares, Ana Blunck, Uwe Neumann, Konrad Bitter, Kerstin Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of different pre-treatments on the long-term bond strength of fiberglass posts luted either with dual-curing self-etch adhesives and core build-up composites or with a self-adhesive resin (SAR) cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 180 human root-filled teeth received post-space preparations and three different dentin pre-treatments (PTs): PT1, ethanol (99%); PT2, ethanol-tertiary-butanol-water-solution (AH Plus Cleaner, Dentsply Sirona; York, USA); and PT3, distilled water (control). Five luting systems were used: FU, Futurabond U (Voco; Cuxhaven, Germany); CL, Clearfil DC Bond (Kuraray Noritake; Okayama, Japan); GR, Gradia Core SE Bond (GC Europe NV; Leuven, Belgium); LU, LuxaBond Universal (DMG; Hamburg, Germany); and RX, RelyX Unicem 2 (3M; Minnesota, USA). Roots were cut into six slices (1 mm thick). From each root canal region, three slices were submitted to immediate and three to post-storage push-out testing. The latter were subjected to thermocycling (5–55°C, 6.000 cycles) and stored for six months in saline solution (0.9%, 37°C). Data were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA and chi-square tests (MV±SD). RESULTS: Bond strength was significantly affected by material (p<0.0005), pre-treatment (p=0.016), and storage (p<0.0005; repeated-measures ANOVA). LU (18.8±8.1MPa) revealed significantly higher bond strength than RX (16.08±6.4MPa), GR (15.1±4.6MPa), CL (13.95±5.2MPa), and FU (13.7±6.3MPa). PT1 (16.5±6.9MPa) revealed significantly higher bond strength than PT3 (14.5±5.7MPa). CONCLUSIONS: A universal adhesive in self-etch mode combined with a core build-up material revealed higher bond strength than a SAR cement, both interacted positively with Ethanol pre-treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Ethanol (99%) rinsing can be recommended as part of post and core pre-treatment for the investigated luting systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8531046/ /pubmed/34125299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03945-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kosan, Esra
Prates-Soares, Ana
Blunck, Uwe
Neumann, Konrad
Bitter, Kerstin
Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo
title Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo
title_full Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo
title_fullStr Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo
title_full_unstemmed Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo
title_short Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo
title_sort root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8531046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34125299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03945-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kosanesra rootcanalpretreatmentandadhesivesystemaffectbondstrengthdurabilityoffiberpostsexvivo
AT pratessoaresana rootcanalpretreatmentandadhesivesystemaffectbondstrengthdurabilityoffiberpostsexvivo
AT blunckuwe rootcanalpretreatmentandadhesivesystemaffectbondstrengthdurabilityoffiberpostsexvivo
AT neumannkonrad rootcanalpretreatmentandadhesivesystemaffectbondstrengthdurabilityoffiberpostsexvivo
AT bitterkerstin rootcanalpretreatmentandadhesivesystemaffectbondstrengthdurabilityoffiberpostsexvivo